What is our primary use case?
We use it mainly in more corporate situations where we need to establish on-premise or more complex and complicated processes that are horizontal on the device, like onboarding processes or procure to pay, where we have to combine different departments on the same trust.
What is most valuable?
The good stuff about IBM is the fact that it's very easy to use, there are very nice and smart AI tools within the licensing that you don't have to pay any access. Moreover, it's more precise and more secure.
What needs improvement?
I would like to have more flexibility in connecting the platform with third-party systems. It is easy to connect IBM RPA with other IBM products, but it is complicated when connecting to non-IBM systems.
So, I would like IBM RPA to be even more flexible in connecting to third-party systems.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for the last six months. There are two versions of IBM RPA. There's a standalone RPA platform, and also, there's a cloud platform embedded with high capabilities and process mining and stuff like that. So I'm using both.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a very stable and clear platform. Also, there's a local representation of IBM, which is valuable for us as integrators and our customers in Greece.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable solution. You can scale up without limits, especially when it comes to cloud automation, where various solutions are available like including data capture, process mining, fast scripting, and decision-making software.
How are customer service and support?
In terms of tech support, it's the best, especially when compared to my previous experiences with other vendors. This is primarily due to the presence of a substantial technical staff from IBM in Greece. Their responsiveness is immediate. Additionally, their product comes with clear and comprehensive training and documentation. This empowers customers to handle the first level of support themselves. As an integrator, we take care of the second level of support in collaboration with IBM systems.
How was the initial setup?
The setup process for IBM RPA is very easy and clear. The documentation is clear and concise, and our customers can easily budget for the costs without any surprises.
What about the implementation team?
The installation involves the basics and the ability to install and set up the company rules about permissions and stuff like that, especially in more horizontal installations with multiple departments. It's a normal process, there are no surprising elements.
My preference is to use an integrator because I'm handling this job. On the customer side, you will need some IT staff to deploy and manage the RPA solution. However, the training level for the platform is designed to be accessible to business users as well. So, you can also involve business users in the deployment process.
What was our ROI?
For medium-size projects, the ROI can be realized within six to eight months.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is a license model. There is a free trial for one month, so you can use it to run your payloads or proof of concept. After that, you can pay for the license on a monthly or annual basis.
There are no additional costs unless you want to add more products. For example, if you want to set up a decision management platform as well, then you will need to pay for the license of that specific product.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. I would recommend that others give it a serious try because I believe that it's possible to start small and use the available technology to fulfill even complicated and hard-core processes.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator