FreeNAS Reviews

I'm just using it at home for my personal use, and I use it primarily for transferring large video files between temporarily storing large video files between computers. I also use it as a backup for my photographs and videos, and things like that, as well as some important documents.

There are some things where I tend to use Linux for some parts of the work and Windows for others. For example, in video editing, if I've recorded something on a DVD, I will normally use Linux to do the conversion of the DVD into a video file. I will then, normally, edit on Windows as I find that there's Pinnacle Studio, which is commercial and only available on Windows. 

What I tend to do is do the conversion on the Linux machine and I do it to the FreeNAS box. Then I will take it from the FreeNAS box onto the Windows machine and do the editing. And then put it back, probably, depending on what kind of video it is. I will either save it for archival purposes on FreeNAS, or I will move it over to one of my discs. For example, I've got a couple of other hard drives, network drives such as Western Digital. I'll put it on there so I can watch it on TV if I want to.

What I like about it is that I can work on it from any computer or any device.

The initial setup is very simple. The setup wizard is really helpful.

The stability is good.

The solution is open-source and free to use.

The one thing that I find difficult to do which is very time-consuming is that I like to have a backup of the important files. However, they're so big. I haven't really found documentation that explains how to back up quickly well enough. I want to know: how I can connect a hard drive directly to FreeNAS, and then basically copy one of the shares, either a Window share or Linux share, to that hard drive. To do it over the local area network is very slow and very often, due to the fact that it takes so long, things will get interrupted. Either the router will reset or something will happen, and then it gets confusing as to how to get it restarted and get it going again once the connections are re-established. Therefore, being able to do a direct backup of the shares to an external hard drive is something that I would like. Or, if it could be done easily and more quickly over the internet, I'd like to find the documentation that would tell me how to do that. So far, I haven't really found anything that has worked that well.

One of my hard drives has failed and the documentation that I've been able to find has not helped. I know I've replaced drives before, however, I haven't been able to find the right documentation to get it done this time, and now I'm sitting here with a degraded system. I can still lose one more drive and not lose any data, however, I don't like sitting like that. I've got a brand new drive in there, and yet I haven't been able to replace the faulty one that is now in the recycling bin somewhere. That's why I need some documentation for backing up to just an ordinary hard drive. Right now I just find the documentation that is available lacking or confusing.

Scaling the solution is expensive.

I've used the solution probably for about five years.

I did buy a new case with lots of fans as I was having a problem with a disc failing every couple of years. Until this last disc failure, it was probably up for over three years without a hitch. Stability, for the most part, is pretty good.

In terms of scalability, it's a little bit difficult as opposed to something like using similar types of systems. I've been trying to build one with Raspberry Pi and a bunch of hard drives, however, the scalability is a problem in the sense that, for example, I have five hard drives, and if I want to double the size, I would have to buy five new six-terabyte drives. You don't get any benefit by just replacing one of them due to the fact that it works on the basis of the smallest one only. I'd say the scalability is expensive if you really want to increase the size as you've got to replace all the hard drives.

My experience with technical support has been excellent.

They wouldn't have a clue what to do with my NAS box, however, they can certainly deal with Windows, Linux, and machines. They just found that there was too much dust in the cooling fans. One of the cooling fans was blocked. I was told by them everything was working fine now, however, I haven't tried it yet. 

I deal with a local company, not the company directly.

The only other solution that I used, wasn't for the same. I do have a Western Digital network hard drive. I basically just use it to put on videos that I want to watch on TV. This solution didn't really replace that, however, this I use more reliably. I find it's very stable.

The initial set setup was quite easy. One thing that I couldn't get set up properly or didn't work properly, was when I tried to use the cloud or something like that on it. I found that a little bit confusing. However, most of it was pretty straightforward to do the setup.

I just followed the wizard to start with and it probably only took me a few hours to fully deploy the product.

I did not use an integrator or consultant to assist me during deployment, however, there's a volunteer in our computer club who is very familiar with the solution. He's on the development team for FreeBSD. I have used his expertise. He's also going to try to do a Zoom or a similar meeting with me and we'll try to go through step-by-step to do a disc replacement. I've used him for other things in the past, strictly a volunteer, not in a commercial context.

The solution is free and open-source.

That said, if you have hardware failures, then there's the cost of replacing it. That's the only cost. In my case, when I was finding the discs were failing too fast, I determined that the drives were really running too hot and I bought a new really big case with lots of fans. Now the discs are really cool. Everything's really cool in it. Once I invested in the fans, that's when it became ultra-reliable.

I looked at a couple of other solutions at that time. This one, however, looked to me like the best one at the time. Today, maybe there might be more options. For example, there's an open-source file format that some of the Linux ones offer you as an alternative, the ext4, and that's what I was trying to do. I was trying to build a system like this. The advantage that it has is that it will take advantage of if, for example, you add a new, larger hard drive. You can get the benefit of all that storage. The big downside of it is that when, if a drive fails, it basically puts the system down until you do something about it. You're don't run it in a degraded mode as you can on FreeNAS. The other problem it has is that you don't get as much storage. For example, with five one-terabyte drives, on FreeNAS, you would get at least three terabytes, or maybe even four. Whereas you have effectively one drive less of storage with the other system. 

I'm just an end-user. I don't have a business relationship with the company.

I'd advise new users that if they can afford it and depending on their technical capability, that users go with TrueNAS, which is a box with all the stuff they need in it and all the full support. Technical support for Xsystems. That said, if they want to do it with the least possible cost, they should just make sure that their hardware is sized right and they have enough room for all the disc drives they need. They also need to make sure that you've got enough cooling to make sure everything runs cool, as the heat is the biggest killer of hardware. You need to clean it out frequently as dust is the second biggest issue, which really causes cooling problems.

I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.

We use it for our interim backup solution. We are using the latest version.

Its stability is the most valuable. It is reliable, and we don't have to worry too much about it.

They can improve the integration with PSA systems. This functionality could be better.

I have been using FreeNAS for probably two and a half years.

It is stable. We haven't been running into problems with it.

It scales pretty well. There are five engineers who use this solution.

Their technical support is good. There are no problems.

We used Synology. We switched to FreeNAS because we just liked it a little more because of its flexibility.

The initial setup was straightforward.

Its price is okay. It suits our needs.

I would advise others to do their homework. I would rate FreeNAS an eight out of ten.

We mainly use FreeNAS for network-attached storage together with other solutions. 

FreeNAS is much simpler and easier to use than other solutions, but we don't have the complete range of features that come with the full version.

FreeNAS should be better prepared for clustering.

I have been using FreeNAS for five years.

FreeNAS is highly stable, and the performance is okay. It continues to run year after year.

FreeNAS is scalable. We use it on standalone servers, not clusters. 

Setting up FreeNAS wasn't easy initially, but we have been working on the product for years, so we understand it better now. We have three people working with FreeNAS. 

FreeNAS is open-source, but we need to pay for the underlying hardware and Microsoft software.