Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo

Top 10 Exasol Data Warehouse Alternatives

Vendor: Exasol
4.0 out of 5
Start review

Top Exasol Data Warehouse Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Exasol Data Warehouse based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SQL Server, Teradata, and MySQL. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Exasol Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Exasol, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
SQL Server
4.2 out of 5
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
SQL Server
4.2 out of 5
SQL Server offers strong integration with Microsoft products and cost-efficient solutions. In comparison, Exasol Data Warehouse excels in performance and flexibility, providing advanced analytics. SQL Server suits Microsoft-centric environments, while Exasol attracts those needing high-speed analytics and deployment flexibility.
Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. SQL Server Report
SQL Server has a lower setup cost compared to the pricier setup of Exasol Data Warehouse, highlighting notable cost differences between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SQL Server has a lower setup cost compared to the pricier setup of Exasol Data Warehouse, highlighting notable cost differences between the two solutions.
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
Teradata
4.1 out of 5
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
Teradata
4.1 out of 5
Teradata stands out for its scalable integration capabilities and competitive pricing, making it an efficient choice for comprehensive data analytics needs. In comparison, Exasol Data Warehouse offers high-performance analytics and fast data processing, ideal for those prioritizing advanced features over initial costs.
Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. Teradata Report
Teradata's setup costs are generally higher, offering robust enterprise solutions, while Exasol Data Warehouse presents a more cost-effective setup, focusing on scalability and speed, highlighting significant differences in pricing strategy between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata's setup costs are generally higher, offering robust enterprise solutions, while Exasol Data Warehouse presents a more cost-effective setup, focusing on scalability and speed, highlighting significant differences in pricing strategy between the two.
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
MySQL
4.1 out of 5
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
MySQL
4.1 out of 5
MySQL provides reliability and ease of use with a cost-effective setup. In comparison, Exasol excels in high-speed analytics and scalability, offering advanced analytics capabilities. MySQL's affordability attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Exasol appeals to those prioritizing powerful performance and long-term value.
Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL Report
MySQL offers a simple setup with competitive costs, while Exasol Data Warehouse has a straightforward setup process but may involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
MySQL offers a simple setup with competitive costs, while Exasol Data Warehouse has a straightforward setup process but may involve higher initial expenses.
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
Oracle Database
4.3 out of 5
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
Oracle Database
4.3 out of 5
Oracle Database excels in comprehensive data integration and security, supporting various workloads with cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Exasol focuses on in-memory analytics and fast, scalable architecture, making it ideal for businesses requiring quick insights from large data sets.
Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. Oracle Database Report
Oracle Database has a higher setup cost compared to Exasol Data Warehouse, making Exasol a more affordable option for initial installation. These differences highlight cost as a significant factor in deciding between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Database has a higher setup cost compared to Exasol Data Warehouse, making Exasol a more affordable option for initial installation. These differences highlight cost as a significant factor in deciding between the two solutions.
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
SAP HANA
4.2 out of 5
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
SAP HANA
4.2 out of 5
SAP HANA excels in real-time analytics and SAP integration. In comparison, Exasol emphasizes speed and efficiency. SAP HANA suits SAP-centric enterprises, offering comprehensive support and features, while Exasol attracts those seeking quick deployments and rapid query execution with cost-effective pricing.
Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. SAP HANA Report
SAP HANA incurs higher setup costs, offering comprehensive features, while Exasol Data Warehouse provides a more cost-effective setup with scalable performance.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP HANA incurs higher setup costs, offering comprehensive features, while Exasol Data Warehouse provides a more cost-effective setup with scalable performance.
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
Exasol Data Warehouse Logo
Oracle Database In-Memory
4.4 out of 5
Oracle Database In-Memory excels in real-time analytics within the Oracle ecosystem, offering superior transactional speed. In comparison, Exasol Data Warehouse is ideal for advanced analytical processing with its scalability and cost-effective model, making it attractive for data-driven decision-making.
Download Exasol Data Warehouse vs. Oracle Database In-Memory Report
Oracle Database In-Memory's setup cost can be higher due to its infrastructure requirements, while Exasol Data Warehouse offers a more cost-effective setup with streamlined deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Database In-Memory's setup cost can be higher due to its infrastructure requirements, while Exasol Data Warehouse offers a more cost-effective setup with streamlined deployment.

Related categories

Relational Databases Tools
Customer Experience Management
Backup and Recovery