Exasol Data Warehouse vs MySQL comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Exasol and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Exasol is ranked #36, while Oracle is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. Exasol holds a 1.4% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Exasol users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Exasol Data Warehouse

Read 8 Exasol Data Warehouse reviews

1,803 Views
1,623 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MySQL

Read 152 MySQL reviews

17,944 Views
8,972 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Exasol Data Warehouse

MySQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and Exasol Data Warehouse are competing data storage solutions. Exasol appears to have the upper hand in analytics and speed for advanced data processing, whereas MySQL is favored for its cost-effectiveness and versatility in application support.

Features: MySQL supports a wide range of platforms, is known for its integration with LAMP/WAMP stacks, and provides easy setup with Memcached, enhancing performance and scalability. It is an open-source solution offering high flexibility and support for complex querying requirements. Exasol provides excellent scalability and high-performance analytics, especially for large data sets, making it suitable for heavy analytic workloads. Its real-time analytics capabilities ensure quick data processing and insight generation.

Room for Improvement: MySQL's performance can degrade with massive data volumes, and it lacks some advanced analytics features found in purpose-built data warehouses. Its storage engine architecture, while adaptable, might benefit from additional optimization for large data sets. Exasol could enhance its flexibility for various development environments and improve ease of integration with diverse application stacks. The complexity of setting up Exasol for smaller-scale environments may be reduced to appeal to a broader range of users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL benefits from a straightforward deployment process, supported by extensive community resources and documentation. Its widespread usage ensures a wealth of tutorials and support materials. Exasol deployment can be complex due to its focus on substantial analytic operations, but it offers dedicated customer support to assist users through the process.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL's open-source nature and no licensing cost result in low initial expenses and a positive ROI, especially in simpler environments. Exasol, though requiring a higher initial investment due to its premium analytic features, delivers improved ROI through efficient data processing for data-intensive operations, justifying the cost by providing valuable insights and advanced capabilities for users excited about data-driven decision-making.

To learn more, read our detailed Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Exasol Data Warehouse

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

36th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

152

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Exasol Data Warehouse is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MySQL is 6.1%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
MySQL	6.1%
Exasol Data Warehouse	1.4%
Other	92.5%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Shubham-Agarwal

Manager - Projects at Cognizant

Fast query processing and easy-to-store all the data

There are very few companies that are using Exasol, but the majority of companies are using SQL Server, Cloud or IBM Db2 Database, or any other databases. Therefore, the resources are limited, which is my only concern. So if I face any issues, limited resources are available to help me resolve the issue with Exasol. From that perspective, it can be a bit of a struggle for me to find a solution. In the next release, I would like to see better compatibility issues. Currently, Exasol has limited compatibility with other software like Python and R. For example, If I talk about SQL Server, we can connect it to big data or Python, which is also compatible with different servers.

Read full review

Amandeep Pawar

Senior Engineer at Airy Software Technologies Private Limited

Careful data design has delivered consistent transactions and supports reliable microservices

MySQL is a reliable and mature relational database, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. One area is horizontal scalability. While MySQL supports scaling for applications, handling write-heavy workloads often requires additional solutions such as sharding, which adds complexity. Another area where it could improve is in native support for advanced analytics and large-scale distributed processing, which may require specialized databases. Changing the database schema on large tables can also be challenging and may require careful planning to minimize downtime. Performance tuning is powerful, but identifying and optimizing slow queries often requires manual analysis and experience. Having more built-in performance insights and automated optimization recommendations would be helpful for administrators. In terms of documentation and security, I think MySQL could be improved in those areas. While the official documentation is comprehensive, it can sometimes be difficult for beginners to navigate, especially for advanced topics such as application partitioning and query optimization. More practical examples and architecture-focused guides would be beneficial. On the integration side, MySQL already works well with frameworks such as Spring Boot and Hibernate, but enhancing support for modern cloud-native deployments, Kubernetes, and automated observability would simplify operations. MySQL is a mature and dependable database, and I hope to see improvements primarily around administration, better operational tooling, and a smoother developer experience rather than fundamental database capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is hands-off; you set it up insert your data and it self tunes queries."

"Its speed is great."

"The most valuable feature of Exasol is its speed."

"It is easy to scale."

"The speed is very good compared to other databases, like SQL Server or Oracle."

"We can quickly scale the solution as it works on an MPP system."

"This solution is extremely fast and very stable; you set it up and put your data on it and as long as it's structured, it self-tunes queries and doesn't require a database administrator."

"We mainly chose Exasol for its performance reasons."

More Exasol Data Warehouse pros

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its ubiquity, as MySQL is everywhere, so if I need to find a developer to do things to it that I don't know, it's very easy to find someone who has expertise in it."

"What I've been most pleased with is the cost point, performance, and ease of use."

"I would recommend the solution to those interested in using the free, stable version of the solution which incurs no licensing costs."

"We majorly use the application now, and using MySQL to read our select queries helps us to achieve stability."

"One of the most valuable features is MySQL's ability to run our email system. We use a system called Colab."

"The main advantage is the very large user base. This enables users to fix about any issue by answering any question."

"The most valuable feature is the fact that the product is cross-platform, because it reduces server TCO, for my small company."

"It has provided a low-cost, high-availability solution without complex active/standby management using Linux HA."

More MySQL pros

Cons

"Lacks a cloud-based platform."

"You have to install Exasol drivers, and it's not easy to find or implement a driver into different systems."

"There are limited resources available to help me resolve the issue with Exasol."

"It's not cloud-native so many maintenance operations require downtime."

"They don't talk very well to with other products when it comes to connectivity. Integration is lacking."

"The only area where we found it could improve was in custom role creation and security, and it was difficult to work with."

"The price is quite expensive relative to other similar solutions, it could be more accessible in that sense."

"It would be beneficial if the updates would occur more often."

More Exasol Data Warehouse cons

"In MySQL, you can only have one master. The master's scalability was always a problem."

"It has a lot of options to interact with. Sometimes it is hard to find the appropriate options quickly."

"The cluster is not the best when it comes to MySQL; that's why we switched to MariaDB, for that simple reason that the cluster there is better, more manageable, and easier to work with."

"On the database side, it should be really lightweight, and the data structure should be like MongoDB."

"From a user perspective, the initial setup could be simplified a bit."

"MySQL doesn't have the auto-clustering and database clustering features that other competitors provide. They can include these features."

"Integration is a key feature in need of improvement."

"The online backup needs to improve."

More MySQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's cost is mid-ranged."

"The pricing falls within the moderate range."

"I use the open-source free community version."

"I use a free version at present."

"MySQL is a cheap solution."

"MySQL is a free and open-source solution."

"We are using the free version of MySQL. We prefer paying for a yearly license."

"It is free. It is an open-source platform."

"The tool is open source."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

11%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	75
Midsize Enterprise	34
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs Exasol Data Warehouse

Compared 11% of the time

Teradata vs Exasol Data Warehouse

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Database vs Exasol Data Warehouse

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Exasol Data Warehouse

Compared 6% of the time

SAP HANA vs Exasol Data Warehouse

Compared 5% of the time

More Exasol Data Warehouse Competitors

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 21% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Database vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Exasol Data Warehouse

September 2026

Download Exasol Data Warehouse product report

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

September 2026

Download MySQL product report

Overview

Exasol Data Warehouse is renowned for its exceptional speed and automatic optimization, making it user-friendly. It enhances data processing on platforms such as Tableau, ensuring efficient dashboards for users across countries.

Exasol Data Warehouse offers an impressive performance by outperforming competitors like SQL Server and Oracle. Its automatic optimization and hands-off setup simplify deployment, while robust SQL support and self-tuning capabilities improve workflows. Users benefit from its high processing speed, supporting efficient data queries and broader workflows, alongside an intuitive interface and comprehensive documentation. Despite its performance strengths, it struggles with global recognition, connectivity, and integration. Challenges include custom role creation and security, with limited row-level security support. Users seek more frequent updates and better compatibility with languages such as Python and R. It requires specific drivers, is not cloud-native, and has a high cost. With limited resources available, security features for MPP processing need enhancement.

What are the key features of Exasol?

Impressive Speed: Outperforms counterparts in data processing, enhancing efficiency.
Automatic Optimization: Boosts performance and ease of use.
Robust SQL Support: Facilitates seamless data handling and queries.
Self-Tuning Capabilities: Reduces manual intervention for users.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user engagement and accessibility.

What benefits should users look for in Exasol?

Enhanced Performance: Streamlines and accelerates BI functions.
Improved Dashboard Efficiency: Increases effectiveness on platforms like Tableau.
Ease of Use: Simplifies set-up with hands-off setup and self-tuning.
Broad Integration: Acts as backend for tools like MicroStrategy.
Central Data Repository: Supports critical data management across regions.

Exasol Data Warehouse is implemented to enhance performance in reporting systems and development processes, serving teams in Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil. It acts as a backend for reporting tools such as MicroStrategy while accelerating BI functions. It supports the resolutions of data issues from tools like Tableau, provides ad-hoc analysis, and manages critical data points efficiently.

Exasol

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

Sample Customers

1&1 Internet SE 11880 Internet Services AG AB Svenska Spel Accarda AG Aera Technology Inc. AGRAVIS Raiffeisen AG Apotheken-Rechen-Zentrum GmbH AQR Capital Management, LLC arvato distribution GmbH ARZ Allgemeines Rechenzentrum GmbH Badoo Limited Baur Versand (GmbH & Co. KG) BIScience Ltd Blocket Blue Yonder GmbH Codilink UK Ltd T/A Coniq crealytics GmbH dailyme TV GmbH Dailymotion S.A. Dataforce Verlagsgesellschaft für Business Information mbH Deutsche Postbank AG Digitales Rezept Zentrum GmbH DIKW Groep direct services Gütersloh GmbH DR Technologies Ltd. dress-for-less GmbH econda GmbH emetriq GmbH empiriecom GmbH & Co. KG Flaconi GmbH Fresenius Netcare GmbH Fyber GmbH GfK SE Grant Street Group, Inc. Gruner + Jahr GmbH Gymshark UK Hahn Air Lines GmbH Hermes Einrichtungs Service GmbH & Co. KG INNOVATIVE SCHEDULING, LLC internetstores GmbH INTERSPORT Deutschland eG IQVIA Commercial GmbH & Co. OHG IQVIA Commercial Sp. z o.o. IQVIA Incorporated iVantage Health Analytics K - Mail Order GmbH & Co. KG LIQ CORP SA Manor AG Basel Match2Lists Limited MEDION AG Midasplayer AB Monsoon Accessorize Limited m-pathy GmbH msales Ltd. MTG Modern Services AB MW Aviation GmbH & Co. KG Myntra Designs Pvt Ltd Netzeffekt GmbH New Company Services Ltd. NOVENTI HealthCare GmbH Olympus Europa SE & Co. KG Operation Fistula OpsDataStore OTTO (GmbH & Co KG) Panda Retail Co. PAPSTAR GmbH Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. Questback GmbH RatePAY GmbH Revolut Ltd. Saarland-Sporttoto GmbH Sagarmatha Ltd. SIA Damara Technologies Supermärkte Nord Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG The National Research Center for College & University Admissions, Inc. United Utilities Water Ltd. Verlag C.H. Beck oHG Vocal Planet Ltd. Vodafone Group Services GmbH Webtrekk GmbH wer liefert was? GmbH Windeln.de SE Wooga GmbH XING SE Zalando SE

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Buyer's Guide

Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL

September 2026

Free Report: Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.