Control-M by BMC is engineered to manage hybrid cloud workflows, offering orchestration capabilities starting at $29,000 annually. Aimed at helping growing teams, it efficiently supports cross-environment scheduling and automation needs.



| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 4.1% |
| Camunda | 18.9% |
| Temporal | 6.5% |
| Other | 70.5% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camunda | 4.1 | 18.9% | 89% | 78 interviewsAdd to research |
| Appian | 4.2 | 5.0% | 95% | 64 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 99 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 866 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 376 |
| Large Enterprise | 2764 |
Control-M offers robust cross-platform scheduling, automation, and integration with applications such as SAP and Informatica. Users appreciate its ease of use with a graphical interface, centralized management, and monitoring capabilities. Advanced features, including Managed File Transfer, automated error handling, and real-time alerts, enhance productivity. The ability to unify workflows and support diverse environments makes Control-M a trusted tool in many sectors. While improvements in reporting flexibility and API integration with tools like ServiceNow are needed, addressing performance issues during upgrades could enhance its value. Offering improved support for new technologies and cloud environments is beneficial, with cost-effectiveness being a consideration.
What are the key features of Control-M?Control-M is leveraged in industries like finance for enterprise scheduling and data management, supporting mainframe, Linux, Unix, Windows, and cloud platforms. It contributes to workflow orchestration and workload automation, improving operational efficiency and enhancing IT infrastructure across those environments.
Control-M was previously known as Control M.
The Bank of East Asia, LINE Bank Taiwan, Coop, Air Europa, Carrefour, Itau Unibanco, Snam, Embraer, ANZ Bank, EDP, Dominio's, Tampa General Hospital, W&W Informatik GmbH, Veterans General, Up Sí Vale, Sky Italia, REWE digital GmbH, Raymond James, Railinc, Navistar, Management Science Associates, Colruyt, CARFAX, Banpara, Aspiag Service, Amadeus, AG Insurance, ING Bank Slaski
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Batch Admin at NBC Universal | 4.5 | I've found Control-M to be a reliable orchestration tool that effectively integrates diverse systems, simplifies operations, and supports DevOps and DataOps, though improvements in user interface and broader integrations would enhance usability moving forward. |
| Senior System Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I've used Control-M for 24 years and find it stable, scalable, and great for automation and file transfers, though reporting needs improvement. It's cost-effective long-term but licensing changes may impact affordability for some companies. |
| Controller Administrator at a government with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I've found Control-M to be a reliable, scalable solution that has automated our workflows, reduced errors, and significantly improved release speed, enabling us to support DevOps initiatives and handle complex data pipelines across multiple environments. |
| ETL Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I've used Control-M for 5–6 years in banking; it's stable, visually intuitive, and better suited for large companies, though setting dependencies is complex. An ETA portal for business users and drag-and-drop features would enhance usability. |
| Sr Manager at Vodafone | 4.5 | I've used Control-M extensively for various workflows, and its GUI and file transfer features stand out, though support for legacy systems needs improvement. It's stable, scalable with planning, costly, but among the top technically. |
| Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I focus on ensuring Control-M operates without disruption, prioritizing its reliability for our application teams. Its standout feature is seamless API integration. While support is excellent, cost improvements would enhance value. We've used Control-M for decades with success. |
| Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used Control-M extensively for workload automation, finding it highly stable and scalable, though MFT lacks high availability. Integration with other tools is strong, but pricing is high and support quality varies. Overall, it's a solid, evolving solution. |
| Director of Sales at a tech services company with self employed | 4.5 | I've used Control-M for 15 years to automate banking operations, drastically reducing processing time and errors. It's stable, scalable, easy to monitor, and integrates well, though AI features could improve. Implementation takes time but delivers solid ROI. |