

Control-M and Auth0 are leading solutions in workflow automation and identity management. Control-M holds the upper hand in extensive integration capabilities and comprehensive workflow management, while Auth0 excels in authentication flexibility and security.
Features: Control-M impresses with cross-platform scheduling, seamless integration with systems like SAP and cloud services, and advanced forecasting tools. Its GUI is notably user-friendly, supporting extensive job monitoring and automation. Auth0 stands out for its robust authentication protocols, offering smooth integration with various identity providers and enhanced customization options in login experiences. Its API key management adds an extra layer of security.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could benefit from enhanced output analysis and more flexible licensing options. Its custom report generation needs bolstering to meet user demands. Auth0 would do well to refine machine-to-machine authentication documentation and expand its login customization capabilities. Offering stronger support for multi-tenancy would also be a significant improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M is noted for its deployment in hybrid cloud environments and responsive customer support, despite some deployment complexity. It benefits from an active user community for additional support. Auth0 is praised for its easy cloud deployment, though complexities in advanced use cases arise. Customer service is noted to be effective, but users call for more support in handling intricate integrations.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M’s pricing typically reflects its expansive functionality, often impacting cost based on job numbers and complexity. This pricing model may benefit from careful consideration of licensing. Its capability to streamline complex IT environments delivers substantial ROI. Auth0 is lower priced comparatively, offering tiered plans that suit large-scale deployments with extensive authentication needs, achieving cost efficiency and securing investment returns.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
The support staff are engineers, not just frontline personnel, ensuring expert assistance.
Their support is excellent.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
The tool is very scalable and meets our customers' needs.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
By default, the user profile does not contain the name, first name, or address, which I would expect.
Auth0 could be made more accessible to beginners.
A reduction of 20-25% would be great.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
The cost of the solution itself was cost-effective enough that I didn't even need to compare it with EntraID.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
The most important feature for me was the ease of use, as it needed to be easy to integrate into my platform.
The most valuable feature of Auth0 is its customizability.
The best features Auth0 offers are its scalability and it is a better way of authenticating a user compared to just a tokenized version of authentication where the token is static and does not offer dynamic authentication compared to how Auth0 offers it.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 4.5% |
| Auth0 Platform | 6.3% |
| Other | 89.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 140 |
Auth0 Platform utilizes JWT-based authentication and supports over 30 social logins, enabling integration with various codebases. Known for robust security, compliance, and scalability, it's tailored for enterprises needing customizable, efficient authentication solutions.
Auth0 Platform is a comprehensive identity management system used for customer, business-to-business, and API authentication across cloud infrastructures like AWS, Azure, and GCP. It simplifies user logins and identity management with features like Single Sign-On, identity federation, and multi-tenancy. Enterprises rely on it for its dynamic authentication capabilities and efficient management of user roles. However, areas for enhancement include authorization features, flexible pricing for small developers, and enhanced documentation for machine-to-machine authentication. Improving multi-tenancy support and customizable login experiences could elevate its appeal.
What are the key features of Auth0 Platform?In industries deploying Auth0 Platform, such as cloud-based service providers and enterprises using API-driven architectures, its implementation focuses on secure and seamless user logins. Many leverage its readiness for scaling authentication processes and its extensibility, including support for Single Sign-On and identity federation, to create streamlined user experiences across businesses. Expanding multi-factor authentication beyond traditional methods and refining social login integrations are common approaches to address specific industry needs.
Control-M SaaS by BMC is tailored for growing teams, offering essential orchestration for managing hybrid cloud workflows starting at $29,000 annually.
Control-M integrates automation, orchestration, and a user-friendly interface to streamline workflows across banking, DevOps, and cloud environments. Key modules like Managed File Transfer and cross-platform support simplify job monitoring, while Batch Impact Manager enhances scheduling. Despite its capabilities, improvements in output analysis, reporting customization, offline access, and API integration are desired by users.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is implemented in industries such as finance and enterprise operations, aiding in automating batch processing across platforms like SAP and Teradata. It integrates with secure file transfers, ERP systems, and databases, whether deployed on-premises or cloud, ensuring seamless operation optimization.
We monitor all AI IT Support reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.