Windward Core vs XLCubed comparison

Windward Studios and Fluence Technologies are both solutions in the Reporting category. Windward Studios is ranked #19, while Fluence Technologies is ranked #30. Windward Studios holds a 1.3% mindshare in RT, compared to Fluence Technologies’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Windward Studios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Fluence Technologies users who would recommend it.

Windward Core

Read 36 Windward Core reviews

3,117 Views
2,151 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

XLCubed

Read 2 XLCubed reviews

1,062 Views
828 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Windward Core

XLCubed

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Windward Core and XLCubed compete in the business intelligence and reporting solutions market. Windward Core holds an advantage in integration and flexibility, while XLCubed has superior data visualization and analytics capabilities.

Features: Windward Core offers flexible document generation, seamless systems integration, and extensive template design. XLCubed provides advanced analytics, interactive data visualization features, and detailed data exploration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Windward Core provides straightforward deployment and comprehensive support, enabling quicker adoption and issue resolution. XLCubed offers flexible deployment options but may require more technical expertise initially, better suited for environments prioritizing analytics.

Pricing and ROI: Windward Core has competitive setup costs and strong ROI for document-focused processes. XLCubed has higher initial costs but justifies this with robust analytics and high data visualization capabilities, appealing to businesses with complex analytical needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Windward Core vs. XLCubed Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Windward Core vs. XLCubed

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Windward Core

Ranking in Reporting

19th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Document Generation Tools (2nd)

XLCubed

Ranking in Reporting

30th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Reporting category, the mindshare of Windward Core is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of XLCubed is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Reporting Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Windward Core	1.3%
XLCubed	1.1%
Other	97.6%

Reporting

Featured Reviews

Christopher Heinz

Sr. Systems Analyst at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Strong layout and design capabilities; leverages every aspect available in Word-native formatting

The licensing key is a little bit twitchy. I'd like to see more HTML formatting support in templates. It has a basic stock of HTML formatting capability, but it doesn't have a rich vocabulary. I have to work around that sometimes. The help documentation and blog posts are extensive, but not always up to date. The error reports also need improvement. If you don't key it in right, it's a little hard to find the root cause. It gives you information as much as it can, but it doesn't really hone in and tell you explicitly what you should do to correct the problem.

Read full review

it_user1391316

Head of Finance Systems at NHS

Cost effective with great capability, performance, flexibility and visuals

In general, we're happy with the solution but we're always looking to see what else is out there. The thing we've struggled with is our partnership with Tagetik UK, the consultants, and the issue we had gaining access to consultants to develop the solution on our behalf. Thankfully we connected directly with XLCubed and now have a pretty close and good relationship with them so the earlier problem we had of actually getting resources to help us develop has now been solved. One of the things that we've been asking for and would like as an additional feature is a sort of benchmarking functionality. The ability to be able to benchmark, directly against the company digital corporate numbers. That said, there seems to be improved functionality within the latest release that could help us develop that further.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the things they added in the last two or three years is PODs, Portable Object Doclets. One of our clients said they wanted to use PODs. They're a good way to make some constructs modular and keep things in one place."

"Some of our clients are looking at the nested filtering which is coming out. That's going to be a huge benefit for them because they're going to be able to nest and loop while they're also looking at filtering out certain data elements."

"Customer Service: As good as the product is, the customer service is even better."

"It's very feature-rich. You can create tables, you can create graphs, you can import pictures, and those features are also easy to use."

"The integration with MS Office is an advantage, creating a better user experience."

"Now clients are quite happy as they get pretty much what they wanted."

"We currently have over 5000 files active in our system, so this saves the user a lot of time."

"The usually the response is within one hour. The technical support will WebEx with you. I rate them as a 10 out of 10."

More Windward Core pros

"I am looking forward to testing their full graphics that are available, as they looked very interesting in the demo."

"The solution has great capability, performance, flexibility, visuals, everything, and we also have a very good relationship with the consultants and the solution is also very cost effective."

Cons

"It needs better support for upgrades and more control over layout of elements. Upgrades tend to break existing output. Elements do not position where expected due to insertion of blank lines and page breaks. It takes time to fix these through trial and error."

"Was limited by XML path restrictions. There were a couple of times I wanted to do something in the formulas which was prohibited by XML path but okay to do in Excel and the product is sold as being able to do whatever Excel can do in terms of formulas."

"I have to deal with VERY long lists of properties contained in our XMLs and it would be nice if Windward offered a way to alphabetize this property list."

"The tool does not support macOS documents."

"They could make the document creation performance faster. I'm not saying it's slow but it takes time to create the PDFs. If they could make it faster, that would be one area for improvement."

"AutoTag improvements: does not support dynamically changing headers and footers on Microsoft Office Word templates."

"There are some Excel formatting things that you lose when you implement a template: some default Excel validation scripts, macros. You could create them in Excel if you were just using Excel, but in creating a template that generates a report, some of those validation things are lost."

"I would like to see examples included within the Wiki information to show how each function option could be used."

More Windward Core cons

"Would like the ability to be able to benchmark."

"At this time, I cannot recommend this solution to others because I cannot connect."

"It's quite a stable solution although we sometimes encounter issues internally within our IT department with regard to the structure."

"There should be a better or an easier way to establish that connection to external sources."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can't advise anybody about pricing and licensing, but it was competitive. A lot of things we did look at were all volume-based, so it was a case of you buy a license to generate this many reports a year, and that's not something that I'm particularly interested in because it doesn't give you any idea - if we have future growth, or if we have a lean year - for budgeting reasons it's more difficult. With Windward it's a straight out license fee, whether we generate one page or we generate a million, it makes no difference."

"From my experience in this field, the product is reasonably priced, at least with the RESTful engine implementation. It's definitely not a cheap option. People say, "That's a fair amount of money to pay for a document generation tool." At the same time, you do get good functionality and the support is good."

"I'm starting to hear clients squeal about the price of their software. The cost of the software has gone up."

"It is absolutely worth the value. They have flexibility, depending on what you're looking for from a buying standpoint. The current pricing models are quite flexible, with the ability to use it on an as-needed basis, or to get a perpetual license that covers a customer that might have extensive needs. I think it's pretty good."

"The pricing is fair. The way that they have it priced is the Windward Designer has a price that's associated with it. Then, depending on the number of cores that you're looking for, that is the price that you pay. The more cores that you want, the more expensive it is."

"Pricing is something I complain about. Production pricing is okay, but for a testing environment the pricing looks a bit high to me."

"We negotiated our prices many years ago, and while they go up a little bit here and there, they've been pretty steady."

"The only problem with the pricing of Windward is the limitation on the number of reports generated. It is costly in that sense. If you want to increase, you have to pay more, based on the number of reports generated per day. It is not the same with Crystal Reports. With the latter, you buy a license at one point in time and that's it."

More Windward Core pricing and cost advice

"14,000 Pounds per year for licensing."

"I am still using the two-week trial, but at first sight, the price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Windward Core

Compared 16% of the time

SAP Crystal Reports vs Windward Core

Compared 14% of the time

Docmosis vs Windward Core

Compared 7% of the time

TIBCO Jaspersoft vs Windward Core

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs Windward Core

Compared 5% of the time

More Windward Core Competitors

Tableau Enterprise vs XLCubed

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs XLCubed

Compared 21% of the time

QlikView vs XLCubed

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle OBIEE vs XLCubed

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Crystal Reports vs XLCubed

Compared 8% of the time

More XLCubed Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Windward Core

July 2026

Download Windward Core product report

Buyer's Guide

Reporting

August 2026

Download XLCubed product report

Also Known As

Windward, Windward Studios

No data available

Overview

Windward Core integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Office, enabling users to create and manage templates efficiently. Its intuitive design, combined with support for data sources like XML and SQL, makes it versatile for generating high-quality documents and reports in multiple formats.

Windward Core provides a powerful document generation platform tailored for businesses aiming to streamline report creation. The AutoTag feature simplifies complex report designs, allowing non-technical users to craft reports with minimal learning effort. The system's versatility is reflected in its compatibility with multiple data sources and superior output formats, including PDF and HTML. Effective training enhances user proficiency, though improvements are sought in areas like PDF generation, Word format consistency, and a more intuitive interface. Users also seek expanded reporting features and better error handling to enhance troubleshooting processes.

What are the standout features of Windward Core?

Microsoft Office Integration: Enables seamless template management and creation.
AutoTag Feature: Simplifies complex report design, reducing development time.
Data Source Flexibility: Supports XML, SQL, and other sources for enhanced versatility.
Output Format Options: Produces documents in various formats, including PDF and HTML.
Intuitive Design: Minimizes the learning curve for non-technical users.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Windward Core?

Reduced Development Time: Accelerates report creation with intuitive features.
Enhanced Flexibility: Works well with diverse data sources.
Improved User Proficiency: Effective training resources aid skill acquisition.
Versatile Document Outputs: Multiple format options meet different needs.

In specialized industries like law and finance, organizations utilize Windward Core to produce extensive reports and manage document templates effectively. Law firms and banks leverage its technology to create templates for legal and financial documents. It also supports dynamic document creation for tax communications and targeted outputs in sectors like elevator manufacturing.

Windward Studios

XLCubed enhances data analytics by offering seamless integration with Microsoft Excel. Its flexibility provides users with advanced data visualization, facilitating efficient business intelligence.

XLCubed stands out in the data analytics landscape by empowering Excel users with sophisticated capabilities for data visualization and analysis. It enables users to create interactive dashboards directly in Excel, bridging the gap between data sources and actionable insights. With XLCubed, decision-makers can easily access critical data in real-time, improving the pace and quality of decision-making processes.

What are the most important features of XLCubed?

Interactive Dashboards: Craft dynamic and interactive dashboards that bring data to life seamlessly within Excel.
Direct Data Access: Connect directly to data sources like SQL and OLAP, ensuring real-time insights without redundant data transfers.
Advanced Charting: Utilize a wide array of chart types to represent data compellingly, allowing for nuanced data interpretation.
Slicer Support: Use Excel’s slicers for intuitive filtering and drill-down capabilities within reports.
Rapid Report Creation: Facilitate the swift creation of complex reports that are easy to share and refresh.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Increased Productivity: Save time by leveraging Excel’s familiar environment, reducing the learning curve for advanced analytics.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Seamless data integration enhances the speed and accuracy of business decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Minimize additional software costs by leveraging existing Excel infrastructure.
Scalable Insights: Support growing data needs without extensive overhauls to existing systems.

XLCubed is often implemented by industries that rely heavily on data-driven strategies, such as finance, retail, and healthcare. In finance, it enables real-time portfolio monitoring and risk assessment. Retail industries utilize it for sales analysis and demand forecasting, while healthcare benefits from the timely presentation of patient and clinical data insights.

Fluence Technologies

Sample Customers

HAL, Inc., Axe Group, White Clark Group, Blueprint Software, Aspect Security, Nucleus Software, LeBlanc’s Food Stores, South Sound 911, Aegon, Barclays, Fidelity Investments, ArisGlobal LLC, USDA, RepLink, AON Hewitt

Marshalls Ltd, BP Exploration and Production, Thorntons, Ted Baker, Bristol-Myers, Rank Group, ING Bank Genve, Cargill Value Investment, Chloride Power, Auchan, Erste, UEFA, Novartis, Porsche Informatik, Raiffeisen Bank International

Buyer's Guide

Windward Core vs. XLCubed

August 2026

Free Report: Windward Core vs. XLCubed

Find out what your peers are saying about Windward Core vs. XLCubed and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Windward Core vs. XLCubed report.

See our list of best Reporting vendors.

We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.