TIBCO Live Datamart vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

TIBCO and Broadcom are both solutions in the Data Warehouse category. TIBCO is ranked #21, while Broadcom is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3. TIBCO holds a 2.3% mindshare in Data Warehouse, compared to Broadcom’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of TIBCO users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

TIBCO Live Datamart

Read 2 TIBCO Live Datamart reviews

939 Views
723 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 85 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

8,267 Views
2,811 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

TIBCO Live Datamart

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

TIBCO Live Datamart and VMware Tanzu Data Solutions are analytics platforms competing in real-time data processing. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is superior due to its feature set and scalability, while TIBCO provides competitive pricing and ease of deployment.

Features: TIBCO Live Datamart offers real-time streaming analytics, instantaneous decision-making insights, and effective alerting mechanisms. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides comprehensive integration, scalable architecture, and supports a wide range of data environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions features flexible deployment models with virtualization and containerization options and extensive support. TIBCO Live Datamart supports rapid deployment and streamlined setup processes.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO Live Datamart has an attractive initial pricing model, leading to quick ROI through straightforward implementation. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions requires higher initial setup investment, promising greater long-term returns and value over extended use.

To learn more, read our detailed TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TIBCO Live Datamart

Ranking in Data Warehouse

21st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Data Warehouse

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (8th), Relational Databases Tools (23rd), Message Queue (MQ) Software (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of TIBCO Live Datamart is 2.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 4.9%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	4.9%
TIBCO Live Datamart	2.3%
Other	92.8%

Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

Mohsin Pathan

Associate Vice President - Solutions, presales & services at Bahwan CyberTek

Standout features are real-time dashboards and powerful aggregation

This product has a powerful aggregating feature which is great. It also has its own APIs. Whenever the data comes in, it can be streamed out anywhere. It's the only solution that provides real-time dashboards. Tableau doesn't have this feature. The three variants of historical data, real-time data and predicted data from Spitfire, give more strength to LiveDatamart without any dependency on other products. The product is easy to set up with very low maintenance required.

Read full review

Karthik Shivaram

Sr. Manager at STI INFOTECH PVT LTD

Improved multi-cloud data management has simplified operations and supports seamless Kubernetes

From my perspective, the biggest challenge with VMware right now is the pricing. To be very honest, in many cases I find myself recommending alternative solutions instead of VMware. Even if those alternatives come with a bit more complexity, customers are often more willing to accept that than the current VMware pricing model. In the past, VMware used a socket-based licensing model, which was easier for customers to understand and budget for. Now the shift to a core-based licensing model has significantly increased costs for many environments, especially for organizations running modern high-core CPUs. One positive aspect of the new model is that VMware has bundled several components together. For example, earlier when deploying vSphere, customers also had to purchase vCenter separately for management. Now multiple components are packaged into a single SKU, which simplifies some aspects of procurement and deployment. While this consolidation has its benefits, the overall licensing and commercial costs remain very high. Pricing is not the only issue. I believe Broadcom also needs to reconsider its strategy in light of the current market conditions. The approach they are taking may be strategic from a business perspective, but from what I see in the field, it is leading to lost opportunities. Many customers who previously relied on VMware are now actively exploring alternative virtualization platforms. I’m not sure where this direction will ultimately lead, but based on my experience, it is already affecting adoption. Since you’ve been trying to reach me for some time—and we also had a discussion a couple of years ago—I hope this feedback helps Broadcom understand the current sentiment in the market and potentially make adjustments. Another important concern is the way features are bundled. In many cases, customers only need basic virtualization and high availability capabilities. However, the current packaging often includes additional features that they may not need. A good analogy is that if a customer only needs an entry-level car, we shouldn’t be forced to sell them a Rolls-Royce. VMware could benefit from adopting a more modular or à la carte licensing model, where customers can choose only the components they truly require. For example, if a customer only needs core virtualization functionality, they should be able to purchase just that. This would allow partners and solution providers to better align solutions with customer requirements and position VMware more competitively in the market. Another challenge I want to highlight is the pricing model based on U.S. dollars and the way multi-year licensing is handled. In many enterprise and government projects, customers prefer to commit to three-year or five-year licenses and pay the full amount upfront. However, in approximately 20% of the deals I work on, we lose opportunities because VMware only provides dollar-based pricing for the first year. When it comes to the following years, the contract requires renewals annually rather than allowing a fixed multi-year upfront payment. This approach is particularly problematic for government and public sector customers. Many of them are ready and willing to pay for three or five years in advance, but the current VMware model does not support that structure effectively. Because pricing is tied to the U.S. dollar and subject to yearly adjustments, VMware does not lock in pricing for the full term. From a customer’s perspective, this introduces uncertainty and makes procurement more complicated. Ideally, if a price is quoted—for example, $100 per year—it should remain consistent across a multi-year agreement. Customers would be comfortable committing to a five-year term if the price were fixed and predictable. Unfortunately, that flexibility is currently not available across VMware products, whether it is vSphere, VMware Tanzu solutions, or other offerings. For large enterprise environments, one-year commitments are usually not practical. Many enterprise customers prefer longer-term agreements for budgeting and procurement reasons. Even when they are willing to accept the higher cost associated with the core-based licensing model, the lack of a clear multi-year upfront option often becomes a deal-breaker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has a powerful aggregating feature"

"The three variants of historical data, real-time data and predicted data from Spitfire, give more strength to LiveDatamart without any dependency on other products."

"You can create your own rules that include mathematic calculations."

"The solution is mature and stable, even more so since it was acquired by TIBCO."

"It's a very good product for reducing the time and man power needed for database optimization for datawarehousing purposes."

"Before we had Oracle Exadata, some queries would take more than 20 hours of execution, and with Greenplum, it takes a few minutes."

"The security is great, and apart from needing to rely on the developer community for support, I think it's fairly secured, quite robust, and stable so far."

"We saved lots of money in terms of licensing."

"The most valuable feature is it’s robustness."

"Being MPP which is a bulk operator - we were able to do 1.5 million calculation in 15 minutes."

"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."

"It's super easy to deploy and it also supports different languages and analytics."

Cons

"The solution's setup could be quicker and easier."

"Live Datamart runs on JVM which only holds Java and only 60 GB of data. If you try to get more out of it than that, it crashes."

"Improvements need to be made on the load balancing side."

"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."

"The fact GreenPlum is using an older version of Postgres means developers coming from other products will find many missing features in PostgreSQL, features which you would assume are standard."

"I want it to reorder messages in a queue, if possible."

"We needed to configure additional plugins. While it was relatively easy to do this on-premises, it became more challenging in the cloud."

"The installation is difficult and should be made easier."

"I'd like to see more support for structured data and features related to queries on NoSQL keys, extra filters would be helpful."

"I’d like this dashboard to use web sockets, so it would actually be in real time. It would slightly increase debugging, etc."

"This solution struggled with multi-regional synchronization."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution might be considered a bit expensive because it competes with open-source products."

"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."

"This is an open source solution."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"It is an open-source product."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	50

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu GemFire?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is that it is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu GemFire?

See all answers

Comparisons

Snowflake vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 8% of the time

Kovair Data Lake vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 7% of the time

Teradata vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 6% of the time

More TIBCO Live Datamart Competitors

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Teradata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Snowflake vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Warehouse

June 2026

Download TIBCO Live Datamart product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

May 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

Streambase, TIBCO LiveView Data Mart

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

TIBCO Live Datamart is a dynamic data visualization platform that provides real-time insights by continuously analyzing streaming data, enabling businesses to make timely decisions.

This powerful platform allows for interactive, real-time data processing and monitoring, greatly enhancing decision-making capabilities by turning data into an actionable asset. It caters to industries requiring rapid responses by enabling a live view into streaming data, which can be customized to specific requirements and scales seamlessly with growing data needs.

What key features define TIBCO Live Datamart?

Real-time Data Streaming: Delivers instant updates and insights from continuous data streams.
Interactive Dashboards: Offers customizable dashboards for personalized data visualization.
Event-driven Architecture: Helps in identifying and responding to events as they occur.
Scalability: Supports expanding data workflows without losing performance.

What benefits should users look for in TIBCO Live Datamart reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines data processing to improve workflow efficiency.
Enhanced Decision-making: Provides immediate insights for quick strategic decisions.
Customization Flexibility: Allows for tailored data views catering to specific needs.
Cost-effective: Reduces operational costs by optimizing data management processes.

TIBCO Live Datamart is often implemented in industries like finance and telecommunications, where rapid decision-making is essential. For example, in finance, it tracks stock market data in real-time, enabling traders to react quickly to market changes. In telecommunications, it monitors network traffic, ensuring optimal performance and prompt issue resolution.

TIBCO

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Aerospace Corporation, Balfour Beatty Infrastructure Services, Banco Sabadell, Bolton Borough Council

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

June 2026

Free Report: TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.