TIBCO Live Datamart vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

TIBCO and Broadcom are both solutions in the Data Warehouse category. TIBCO is ranked #22, while Broadcom is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6. TIBCO holds a 2.1% mindshare in Data Warehouse, compared to Broadcom’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of TIBCO users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

TIBCO Live Datamart

Read 2 TIBCO Live Datamart reviews

527 Views
390 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 85 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

4,732 Views
1,467 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

TIBCO Live Datamart

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

TIBCO Live Datamart and VMware Tanzu Data Solutions are analytics platforms competing in real-time data processing. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is superior due to its feature set and scalability, while TIBCO provides competitive pricing and ease of deployment.

Features: TIBCO Live Datamart offers real-time streaming analytics, instantaneous decision-making insights, and effective alerting mechanisms. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides comprehensive integration, scalable architecture, and supports a wide range of data environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions features flexible deployment models with virtualization and containerization options and extensive support. TIBCO Live Datamart supports rapid deployment and streamlined setup processes.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO Live Datamart has an attractive initial pricing model, leading to quick ROI through straightforward implementation. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions requires higher initial setup investment, promising greater long-term returns and value over extended use.

To learn more, read our detailed TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TIBCO Live Datamart

Ranking in Data Warehouse

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Data Warehouse

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (5th), Relational Databases Tools (12th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of TIBCO Live Datamart is 2.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 4.0%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	4.0%
TIBCO Live Datamart	2.1%
Other	93.9%

Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

Mohsin Pathan

Associate Vice President - Solutions, presales & services at Bahwan CyberTek

Standout features are real-time dashboards and powerful aggregation

This product has a powerful aggregating feature which is great. It also has its own APIs. Whenever the data comes in, it can be streamed out anywhere. It's the only solution that provides real-time dashboards. Tableau doesn't have this feature. The three variants of historical data, real-time data and predicted data from Spitfire, give more strength to LiveDatamart without any dependency on other products. The product is easy to set up with very low maintenance required.

Read full review

Karthik Shivaram

Sr. Manager at STI INFOTECH PVT LTD

Improved multi-cloud data management has simplified operations and supports seamless Kubernetes

From my perspective, the biggest challenge with VMware right now is the pricing. To be very honest, in many cases I find myself recommending alternative solutions instead of VMware. Even if those alternatives come with a bit more complexity, customers are often more willing to accept that than the current VMware pricing model. In the past, VMware used a socket-based licensing model, which was easier for customers to understand and budget for. Now the shift to a core-based licensing model has significantly increased costs for many environments, especially for organizations running modern high-core CPUs. One positive aspect of the new model is that VMware has bundled several components together. For example, earlier when deploying vSphere, customers also had to purchase vCenter separately for management. Now multiple components are packaged into a single SKU, which simplifies some aspects of procurement and deployment. While this consolidation has its benefits, the overall licensing and commercial costs remain very high. Pricing is not the only issue. I believe Broadcom also needs to reconsider its strategy in light of the current market conditions. The approach they are taking may be strategic from a business perspective, but from what I see in the field, it is leading to lost opportunities. Many customers who previously relied on VMware are now actively exploring alternative virtualization platforms. I’m not sure where this direction will ultimately lead, but based on my experience, it is already affecting adoption. Since you’ve been trying to reach me for some time—and we also had a discussion a couple of years ago—I hope this feedback helps Broadcom understand the current sentiment in the market and potentially make adjustments. Another important concern is the way features are bundled. In many cases, customers only need basic virtualization and high availability capabilities. However, the current packaging often includes additional features that they may not need. A good analogy is that if a customer only needs an entry-level car, we shouldn’t be forced to sell them a Rolls-Royce. VMware could benefit from adopting a more modular or à la carte licensing model, where customers can choose only the components they truly require. For example, if a customer only needs core virtualization functionality, they should be able to purchase just that. This would allow partners and solution providers to better align solutions with customer requirements and position VMware more competitively in the market. Another challenge I want to highlight is the pricing model based on U.S. dollars and the way multi-year licensing is handled. In many enterprise and government projects, customers prefer to commit to three-year or five-year licenses and pay the full amount upfront. However, in approximately 20% of the deals I work on, we lose opportunities because VMware only provides dollar-based pricing for the first year. When it comes to the following years, the contract requires renewals annually rather than allowing a fixed multi-year upfront payment. This approach is particularly problematic for government and public sector customers. Many of them are ready and willing to pay for three or five years in advance, but the current VMware model does not support that structure effectively. Because pricing is tied to the U.S. dollar and subject to yearly adjustments, VMware does not lock in pricing for the full term. From a customer’s perspective, this introduces uncertainty and makes procurement more complicated. Ideally, if a price is quoted—for example, $100 per year—it should remain consistent across a multi-year agreement. Customers would be comfortable committing to a five-year term if the price were fixed and predictable. Unfortunately, that flexibility is currently not available across VMware products, whether it is vSphere, VMware Tanzu solutions, or other offerings. For large enterprise environments, one-year commitments are usually not practical. Many enterprise customers prefer longer-term agreements for budgeting and procurement reasons. Even when they are willing to accept the higher cost associated with the core-based licensing model, the lack of a clear multi-year upfront option often becomes a deal-breaker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can create your own rules that include mathematic calculations."

"The solution has a powerful aggregating feature"

"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."

"Scalable (Massive) Parallel Processing (MPP) – The ability to bring to bear large amounts of compute against large data sets with Greenplum and the EMC DCA has proven itself to be very effective."

"RabbitMQ helped us develop a highly scalable system by decoupling the front end and back end, easily withstanding and passing stress and load testing with more than 10K API calls while providing message queuing and a distributed environment."

"Over time, the most useful feature became the ability to create durable queues, which increased reliability and also boosted performance."

"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."

"Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues."

"It's a very good product for reducing the time and man power needed for database optimization for datawarehousing purposes."

"The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views."

Cons

"The solution's setup could be quicker and easier."

"Improvements need to be made on the load balancing side."

"The installation is difficult and should be made easier."

"The implementation of an upgrade takes a long time."

"RabbitMQ needs 2 additional features: It is lacking a good dashboard on the web interface; maybe they can develop a dashboard for monitoring."

"Some integration with other platforms like design tools, and ETL development tools, that will enable some advanced functionality, like fully down processing, etc."

"Initial setup is a little complex. It took around two weeks to deploy."

"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."

"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."

"VMware RabbitMQ needs to create a new queue system."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution might be considered a bit expensive because it competes with open-source products."

"The product is available for free use since it is an open-source technology."

"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."

"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."

"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"Tanzu Greenplum's pricing is really competitive and gives excellent value for money."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware RabbitMQ?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

Kovair Data Lake vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Netezza Performance Server vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 8% of the time

Snowflake vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 8% of the time

Teradata vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Database Appliance vs TIBCO Live Datamart

Compared 6% of the time

More TIBCO Live Datamart Competitors

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

Snowflake vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Warehouse

February 2026

Download TIBCO Live Datamart product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

February 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

Streambase, TIBCO LiveView Data Mart

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

TIBCO Live Datamart is the industry’s first ultra fast continuous query processing engine made for live operational intelligence. It supports real-time data from anywhere, consumes live streaming data, and can connect to historical data in monolithic and edge systems by using either included data adapters or by leveraging the TIBCO integration platform. With its real-time computations against high-speed streaming data and continuous pushing of results to live queries, TIBCO Live Datamart offers users faster time to actionable insight and automated action.

TIBCO

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Aerospace Corporation, Balfour Beatty Infrastructure Services, Banco Sabadell, Bolton Borough Council

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

March 2026

Free Report: TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our TIBCO Live Datamart vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.