


Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform compete in the endpoint security category. Based on the comparison of each section, ThreatLocker seems to have an advantage due to its deny-by-default approach and better control features.
Features: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security includes robust threat protection functionality, seamless integration with other Trend Micro solutions, and real-time updates for up-to-date threat intelligence. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides a deny-by-default approach, precise control over application behavior, and detailed audit logs, which offer strong protection against unauthorized access.
Room for Improvement: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security could improve in resource utilization and integration, as users report high demands during scanning and challenges with regional policies. Users also seek more streamlined management and cross-platform feature parity. ThreatLocker could enhance its user interface simplicity and training resources, as the learning curve is steep and better policy management could address network saturation issues during updates.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security supports various deployment models, including on-premises, hybrid, and cloud, which enhance flexibility but complicate setup. Its technical support experience varies, with some users desiring faster response and more consistent service. ThreatLocker offers multiple deployment options with a strong emphasis on responsive technical support, with users noting ease in contacting support and quality assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Trend Vision One Endpoint Security features competitive pricing, especially when considering its feature range, with flexible licensing accommodating different needs, though perceived expensive for smaller environments. Users report good ROI due to reduced costs in additional security tools. ThreatLocker is considered cost-effective with significant advantages in comprehensive security features, with fair and flexible pricing allowing for scalability and customization, contributing positively to ROI perceptions.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
I have seen a return on investment with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, as this product is offered at a minimal cost, and we can find a good ROI from it.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
The main return on investment is peace of mind, knowing that with ThreatLocker on any endpoint, it will almost always block all malicious code or exploits, even zero-day exploits.
It keeps malware, Trojans, and ransomware at bay.
We have certainly seen the return on investment with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security given that endpoints are largely focused in terms of cyber attacks.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
Their technical support deserves a rating of nine out of ten.
we reached out to our local vendor in the country for questions, and they resolved these issues with Trend Micro.
We have a really good sales team to manage that and they have been really helpful in giving the proposal as well as the setup and fine-tuning cost every year over year, so that is taken care.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
I think scalability for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is good.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is scalable and stable because we have been using it for more than five years.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
We need more training resources for my team and I, such as developing labs and sessions to implement it more easily.
20% to 30% of endpoints faced difficulty in cleaning or uninstalling the software.
It supports Mac and is fully functional with that.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
I had a really good deal at the time, and it continues to be cost-effective.
The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.
Regarding the price, there was a tender, and Trend Micro won; the price was good.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
The integration of ML and AI provides complete visibility, suggests responses, detects threats, and includes integration into XDR, which covers email security, endpoint security, cloud security, among other aspects.
They are very aggressive for our program, so whenever we have any issue, we just lodge a call, and within 15 minutes, we get the engineer on a call or Webex call to resolve the issue for the solution.
The vulnerability protection module helps to identify which threat group is active and is using which specific vulnerability and also it helps to detect if those vulnerabilities exist within our environment and shows which machine is affected.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 1.1% |
| Trend Vision One Endpoint Security | 1.7% |
| Other | 93.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 45 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 60 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform empowers organizations with application control, selective elevation, and ring-fencing to enhance security and prevent unauthorized access.
ThreatLocker provides comprehensive security management using application allowlisting to ensure only approved software operates across servers and workstations. The platform's centralized management simplifies security processes by consolidating multiple tools, and its robust capabilities align with zero-trust strategies by actively blocking unauthorized applications and ensuring compliance. Users note intuitive features such as mobile access, helpful training resources, and responsive support, which effectively reduce operational costs and help desk inquiries. The managed service providers prefer ThreatLocker to maintain network integrity by preventing malicious scripts and unauthorized access attempts. However, users identify room for growth in training and support flexibility, the interface, and certain technical challenges like network saturation from policy updates.
What are the most important features?Organizations utilize ThreatLocker for application allowlisting, ensuring only authorized software operates to prevent unauthorized access efficiently. Deployed across servers and workstations, its features support zero-trust principles and are favored by managed service providers for application management and network integrity.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security provides robust threat protection through features like a web console and real-time updates. It integrates seamlessly for comprehensive endpoint coverage.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers advanced threat detection and centralized management. It features machine learning and virtual patching to safeguard against both known and unknown threats. Users highlight its ability to secure multiple environments with ransomware protection and data loss prevention. Despite its strengths, improved Linux support and EDR features are needed. Connectivity issues with the firewall and a need for refined reporting are noted, alongside demands for better performance during updates.
What are the key features of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?Companies leverage Trend Vision One Endpoint Security in industries requiring strong data protection, such as healthcare and finance. It is deployed both on-premises and as a SaaS, integrating effortlessly with extensive networks for improved threat detection and device control. Its machine learning capabilities are particularly valued for handling diverse threat vectors efficiently.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.