SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs Statseeker comparison

SolarWinds and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. SolarWinds is ranked #108, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. SolarWinds holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of SolarWinds users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Read 2 SolarWinds Network Automation Manager reviews

501 Views
175 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

538 Views
479 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and SolarWinds Network Automation Manager are competing products in the network management and automation category. Statseeker appears to have the upper hand for businesses focused on cost-effectiveness and customer support, while SolarWinds is favored for its extensive feature set and automation capabilities.

Features: Statseeker offers real-time network monitoring with rapid data retrieval, scalability for various network sizes, and efficient bandwidth utilization. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager provides advanced automation capabilities, comprehensive configuration management, and robust monitoring tools.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could enhance its automation capabilities and feature set to cater to more complex network management tasks. Its documentation and training resources could also be expanded. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager could streamline its setup process and decrease complexity for faster deployment. Enhancing user interface intuitiveness and reducing initial setup costs are other areas of potential improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker's straightforward deployment is complemented by user-friendly features and strong customer support. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager has a longer setup process but benefits from extensive documentation and training resources, providing structured onboarding support.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker presents a lower initial setup cost and delivers strong ROI for cost-efficient solutions. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, despite higher setup expenses, provides value through its comprehensive feature set, appealing to enterprises needing advanced automation with a longer-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

108th

Average Rating

5.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Automation (15th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Giulio Valeri

Owner at SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SRL

Threat detection failures, poor technical support, and expensive

We use the solution to manage all of our customer's systems. We monitor and decide if everything is okay and if not, we do changes when needed. For example, if there is a need to change the antivirus software we can automate the process and install the new one. There are scripts within the software…

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers so many great resources, it makes them a powerhouse in the market."

"The installation is easy."

"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."

"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick."

"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."

"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."

"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."

"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."

"This solution has helped us to proactively identify issues and push some of those fixes down to tier one."

"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"The price could be a bit lower."

"We did not like SolarWinds because it was not able to communicate between UPSA and our accounting system. They should have better integration."

"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."

"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."

"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."

"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."

"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."

"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."

"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."

"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is fair. However, it is more expensive than ConnectWise."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetBrain vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 85% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 15% of the time

More SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 48% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 28% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 24% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Automation

July 2025

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager report

Download SolarWinds Network Automation Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

July 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

SolarWinds NAM

No data available

Overview

Scale environments from 1,000 to tens of thousands of nodes with comprehensive performance, traffic, WAN, and switch port monitoring, automated change and configuration management, and IP address management in an integrated network automation software solution.

SolarWinds

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Maalem Financing Company, School City of Hammond

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Free Report: SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.