SnapLogic vs Tungsten RPA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SnapLogic Logo
2,326 views|1,489 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Tungsten Automation Logo
3,147 views|2,345 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SnapLogic and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed SnapLogic vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a scalable solution.""SnapLogice is a low-code development tool.""The solutions ability to connect "snaps" or components to the graphic user interface is very intuitive, prevents errors, and makes implementations easy.""It is a stable solution.""Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently.""SnapLogic is an IPA tool that leverages a low code environment to connect to multiple sources, extract data, and store it in Azure data lake.""You can use other languages, such as Python, and easily connect to other systems.""The solution could improve its API management."

More SnapLogic Pros →

"The solution is scalable.""The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things.""The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated.""The most valuable feature is the robotic process.""The OCR was quite stable and flexible.""Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low.""The most valuable features are workflow and process automation.""Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."

More Tungsten RPA Pros →

Cons
"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky.""SnapLogic sits somewhere in the middle. It doesn’t offer enough easy canned integrations for its users like some of the easier to use integration apps.""Ultra Pipelines provides real-time ingestion but it needs some adjustment.""The dashboards regarding scheduled tasks need further improvement.""The solution isn't ideal for complex processing or logic. We use another solution for that.""They should expand in terms of features for SaaS-based market requirements in different sectors.""One area for improvement in SnapLogic is the transparency in the flow of data. It needs to have more transparency. Right now, users only have a preview option at the end of any job flow, so at the end of any Snap Pack, there is a data preview option that lets you review the data and see how it's moving. What would make the solution better is more debugging and more access to change data from the preview panel or more functionality in terms of the preview option.""We'd like there to be more ways for users to get more comfortable and have more experience with the solution to make it easier to use."

More SnapLogic Cons →

"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind.""Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular.""Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution.""This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release.""The product has some constraints and performance issues.""The technical support must be improved.""We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly.""I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."

More Tungsten RPA Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."
  • "They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."
  • "SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."
  • "The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."
  • "By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."
  • "The license model is based on consumption."
  • "I used the free trial."
  • "SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."
  • More SnapLogic Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."
  • "Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."
  • "I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."
  • "Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."
  • "Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."
  • "There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."
  • "Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."
  • "I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."
  • More Tungsten RPA Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:SnapLogic is more user-friendly than Boomi in terms of debugging. You can move the mouse to a place, and it will record and show the data easily.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in customer service and support. I don't think the support has better knowledge about technologies and tool support. There were lots of times when we had an issue, and it… more »
    Top Answer:It's similar to other tools like Boomi. But, it's a smaller player, not as widely adopted. SnapLogic may be easier to use, with less coding, but I think that more comprehensive solutions will handle a… more »
    Top Answer:You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.
    Top Answer:Previously, Tungsten RPA offered perpetual licenses, but now it has a subscription-based model for more flexibility, similar to the Microsoft developer platform.
    Top Answer:Tungsten RPA features enhanced desktop automation capabilities, improved Active Directory integration, and upgraded recorder functionality. These updates will be available in the upcoming release… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    Views
    2,326
    Comparisons
    1,489
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    715
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    3,147
    Comparisons
    2,345
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    429
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    DataFlow
    Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow
    Learn More
    Overview

    The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.

    Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.
    Sample Customers
    Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!
    Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Retailer22%
    Transportation Company22%
    Pharma/Biotech Company11%
    University11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Retailer5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Energy/Utilities Company15%
    Logistics Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    SnapLogic vs. Tungsten RPA
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SnapLogic vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SnapLogic is ranked 7th in Cloud Data Integration with 21 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. SnapLogic is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of SnapLogic writes "Easy to set up, easy to use, and is low-code". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". SnapLogic is most compared with AWS Glue, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Azure Data Factory, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and SSIS, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our SnapLogic vs. Tungsten RPA report.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.