Seqrite Endpoint Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise comparison

Seqrite and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Seqrite is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.3, while Broadcom is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Seqrite holds a 1.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of Seqrite users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Seqrite Endpoint Security and Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise are two prominent solutions for endpoint protection. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise appears to be the more robust product due to its advanced features, which users feel justify the higher price.

Features: Seqrite Endpoint Security is praised for its antivirus protection, firewall integration, and advanced threat response capabilities. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise stands out for its comprehensive threat intelligence, machine learning capabilities, and extensive reporting features.

Room for Improvement: Users indicate that Seqrite Endpoint Security could benefit from enhancements in its malware detection rates and occasional performance slowdowns. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise users suggest improvements in the complexity of its configurations and demands for high system resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Seqrite Endpoint Security is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise has a more complex setup process and mixed reviews on customer service effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Seqrite Endpoint Security is favorable for its competitive pricing and satisfactory return on investment. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise demands a higher initial cost but its extensive feature set yields substantial ROI for larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,719 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.6%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.6%
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise	0.6%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	1.1%
Other	94.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

reviewer2162541

IT Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Provides stable and resource-efficient protection but lacks clear modern security features

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is highly compatible and rarely causes disruptions in production. It operates transparently and is easy to maintain. The automated response feature helps to mitigate breaches effectively. When comparing with ThreatDown agent, I have noticed that ThreatDown detects behaviors more readily and flags suspicious user activities more clearly. While Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise remains effective, ThreatDown's user interface is more manageable and provides a clearer system overview. The management interface is crucial for maintaining Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise effectively. A significant advantage of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is its lightweight resource usage. It consumes less memory, CPU, and IO compared to alternatives such as ThreatDown and Bitdefender.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution allows control over the user and his machine through Cortex XDR security policies."

"The scalability of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very good."

"It's very stable. I've never experienced downtime for the ASM console or ASM core."

"Palo Alto is constantly adding new features."

"The product's most valuable features are massive user and feature intelligence exploit detection."

"I have found the solution to be very easy in respect of the integration and configurable."

"It'll not slow down your system when compared to others."

"I can highlight that we have not faced any security incidents with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, and even though our environment is quite dynamic, we have not faced any security incident with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks until now."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Seqrite Endpoint Security provides external protection in terms of hard drives."

"We were excited about the cloud-based management features of Seqrite and were looking to use the same."

"The two valuable features are anti-ransomware and data loss protection."

"The overall performance of the server and the dashboard are the most interesting aspects of the solution."

"Endpoint Security's best features are inventory, asset management, and quick scanning."

"The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use."

"Seqrite Endpoint Security is a good solution."

"There are many features available in this solution, such as asset management."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

"The features I like most about Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is its basic antivirus features and everything it offers, e.g. the scan engine is much better now compared to the previous versions because it became smarter."

"This solution's performance is good, and we've never had any issues with its stability."

"The most valuable feature of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is it runs in the backend and looks after the security for you."

"The best feature is the firewall that lets us allow or block ports. That's a great tool because we can limit specific types of traffic on user devices and apply granular security controls to IPs and ports."

"The most valuable feature of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is the application, and they are adding features frequently."

"The support from Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is good, they have a quick response time."

"Stable with good customer service."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is a hassle-free solution and people are looking for a quick, traditional AV this solution is a good option."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise pros

Cons

"Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth."

"The solution could improve by providing better integration with their own products and others."

"We have found that there are times Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks does not detect some of the viruses, we have to use another protection solution called Kaspersky."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks could improve its user interface, which is more complicated compared to competitors such as SentinelOne."

"Data privacy is a matter of concern. You have to be careful with data privacy, it can be sensitive and Cortex can have most of your access."

"It's not an ideal choice for smaller businesses, as you need a minimum of 200 endpoints to even use the solution at all."

"Although I would say this product is highly-rated, it could probably do more because nothing does everything that you want."

"The solution lacks real-time, on-demand antivirus."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The stability is zero, Seqrite doesn't work, and the company doesn't accept the problems."

"We would like the solution to have integration with other security solutions so that we can have a single base for monitoring all the security incidents and concerns."

"In the next version, they should improve the areas of utility and centralized control."

"The cost of the solution can be improved."

"It should be able to detect and report any ransomware attack but currently, it doesn't detect and it doesn't report any."

"Sometimes, small and medium businesses, or even startups with just five, ten, or fifteen systems, are also keen to secure their data. There is a reluctance on the part of the technical team to extend installation support when the opportunity sizes are smaller. Seqrite Endpoint Security has a lot of value. Still, its marketing could be done much better on a larger scale, especially in India, in light of the new DPDP 2023 Act, which the Indian Parliament passed. It would be even more valuable if Seqrite could incorporate features to help companies comply with this law, it would be even more helpful."

"The product or service could be improved by incorporating SIEM integrations to enable the collection of logs."

"The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

"In the past, I experienced companies that protected themselves with Symantec, suffering some attacks."

"The solution's management dashboard could be improved. An easier-to-use threat-hunting dashboard would make life easier for security analysts. Its support needs to improve for the African region."

"When we asked the support team to relicense the original piece, the team ghosted us."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise could improve by giving notifications regarding identified threats."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise needs to improve its manageability. It is not easy to manage."

"It could be more responsive and have fewer delays."

"The solution could always be more stable and more user-friendly."

"In the future, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise should improve the firewall and documentation."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

"Very costly product."

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"This is an expensive solution."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"It is a cheaply priced product."

"The license isn't expensive."

"The solution's pricing is good for us, where it is neither cheap nor expensive."

"The licensing fee is 200 Bangladeshi Taka per client per year."

"I give the cost of the solution a seven out of ten."

"We get the tool for around 1200 rupees for a three-year subscription. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis. Compared to other solutions, this solution is cheaper."

"You need to pay for a yearly license for Seqrite Endpoint Security, which is expensive."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the solution is reasonable."

"I would rate it a seven, indicating a satisfactory and moderate level. Despite being somewhat on the expensive side, it aligns with our long-standing relationship with Symantec, and we find it acceptable."

"The solution's license is very expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten. For most organizations, the cost is between 70 and 100 dollars per user. The exact price depends on the selected features and the number of users. It's considered a premium cost for an enterprise Endpoint security solution."

"The tool fits within our budget. It is not expensive."

"The license for Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is paid, but there is a trial for 60 days."

"The product is not very expensive."

"The price of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is expensive. When compared to other solutions they should reduce the price."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

11%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's pricing is good for us, where it is neither cheap nor expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks.

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?

The tool is a secure and stable workstation for checking antivirus. The alerting feature helps us see alerts and is e...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?

I have not experienced integrated threat intelligence benefits with Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Many custo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?

The primary use case for Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise for my clients is basic antivirus protection.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 22% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

March 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

March 2026

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise report

Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Seqrite Endpoint Security is a comprehensive security platform used to protect enterprise networks and connected devices from advanced threats. To do so, it integrates with innovative technologies such as Anti Ransomware, Advanced DNA Scan, and Behavioral Detection System.

Seqrite Endpoint Security Features

Seqrite Endpoint Security has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application control: Seqrite Endpoint Security gives you control over the use of unauthorized applications within the network.

Advanced device control: Seqrite Endpoint Security configures device policies for different device types for Windows and Mac platforms to safeguard the network against unverified devices.

Data loss prevention (DLP): Seqrite Endpoint Security’s data loss prevention secures confidential data to avoid losses. Another advantage of this feature is that data that is at rest can also be scanned on endpoints and removable devices.

Ransomware protection: Seqrite Endpoint Security uses behavior-based detection technology to detect and block ransomware threats. In addition, it also backs up your data in a secured location to help you restore your files in case of a ransomware attack.

Vulnerability scan: By scanning known vulnerabilities of applications and operating systems, users can update necessary security patches.

Web filtering: With the web filtering featureת you can block websites individually or according to categories in order to limit web access for employees.

Asset management: This feature helps alert administrators of any alterations on company systems by monitoring hardware and software configurations.

File activity monitor: Seqrite Endpoint Security enables you to monitor confidential company files and notifies administrators when such files are copied, renamedת or deleted.

IDS/IPS protection: Seqrite Endpoint Security provides advanced protection that proactively detects malicious activity to prevent attacks that may exploit application vulnerabilities.

Group policy management: Based on the hierarchy within your organization, administrators can define user groups and can also set flexible policies depending on situational requirements.

Seqrite Endpoint Security Benefits

There are several benefits to implementing Seqrite Endpoint Security. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Advanced security: Seqrite Endpoint Security offers 360-degree data security. The solution provides comprehensive endpoint and data protection in one integrated solution and is suitable for businesses of all sizes.

Uninterrupted protection: With Seqrite Endpoint Security, your daily business operations go uninterrupted, with protection that works to prevent malicious websites, phishing attacks, and more.

Linux-based support: Seqrite Endpoint Security’s solution supports Linux-based systems and also provides higher scalability and enhanced security for Windows and Mac platforms.

Compliance: The solution has competitive security enhancements to meet enterprises’ compliance needs.

Patch management: With Seqrite Endpoint Security, you will have access to simplified and centralized patch management strategy, allowing for higher productivity and more robust security.

Vulnerability detection: By using proactive scanning of installed applications, Seqrite Endpoint Security is able to detect unforeseen vulnerabilities and also reduce unauthorized installations.

Reduced risk: Because the solution has enhanced device control features, it is easier to reduce business security risks.

Advanced endpoint protection: The solution provides advanced endpoint protection with antivirus, firewall, intrusion detection, and more.

Reviews from Real Users

A Manager IT at a healthcare company says, “We use the solution for managing our main product, antivirus, and device locking. There are many features available in this solution, such as asset management. It is easy to install and stable.”

Seqrite

Endpoint Security Enterprise focuses on advanced prevention for traditional endpoints and modern mobile devices. To include attack surface reduction capabilities and detection and response technologies, check out Endpoint Security Complete.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

April 2026

Free Report: Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.