ScienceLogic vs StableNet comparison

ScienceLogic and Infosim are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ScienceLogic is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.7, while Infosim is ranked #86. ScienceLogic holds a 1.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Infosim’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Infosim users who would recommend it.

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

4,294 Views
2,104 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

StableNet

Read 3 StableNet reviews

654 Views
641 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

StableNet

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and StableNet compete in the IT management domain. ScienceLogic seems to have the upper hand in AI and ease of deployment, while StableNet excels in network management and scalability.

Features: ScienceLogic's features include dynamic monitoring, AI-driven insights for real-time analytics, and proactive issue resolution. StableNet offers end-to-end network management, extensive visibility across IT infrastructure, and superior scalability.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve in network management capabilities, scalability for larger networks, and customization options. StableNet may enhance its AI capabilities, integration with third-party tools, and user interface for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides a cloud-based deployment model that simplifies setup with efficient customer service. StableNet offers adaptable on-premise or hybrid deployment with extensive configuration options and reliable support.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic has a mid-range setup cost with quick ROI through automated analytics, making it cost-effective for operational scale. StableNet's pricing is on the premium side, with higher ROI over time through customized scalability and extensive network capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. StableNet Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. StableNet

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,443 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th), AIOps (9th)

StableNet

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

86th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StableNet is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ScienceLogic	1.1%
StableNet	0.3%
Other	98.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

ShahzadAziz

Director of Development/Project Manager at Enablers Private Limited

A highly scalable and stable solution that provides excellent features and can be integrated with any product

The support team is more into R&D. They're not focused on support. The vendor lets the partners provide support for the solution. Partners must have StableNet-certified engineers. Complex problems arise for complex installations. When a problem is deep, it takes a lot of time to resolve it. It goes to the R&D and development teams. They do solve it, but the time taken could be reduced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."

"A major benefit is eliminating visibility gaps, which motivates me to consolidate tools."

"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

More ScienceLogic pros

"The solution is stable."

"We can integrate any tool with StableNet."

"The best features are the reporting, utilization, and network graph."

Cons

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

More ScienceLogic cons

"The solution is expensive."

"The dashboard has a lot of room for improvement."

"The existing dashboard capability is there, but it is not user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

22%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my opinion Infosim, StableNet Enterprise is the best as it is a third-generation highly automated network management system. It enables IT departments to unify the management requirements of the...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs StableNet

Compared 58% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs StableNet

Compared 21% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs StableNet

Compared 21% of the time

More StableNet Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

December 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

November 2025

Download StableNet product report

Overview

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

StableNet provides Fault, Performance, Configuration, and Services Management on a single platform.
It is a vendor agnostic solution, built upon a single, consistent code base. The solution is easy to integrate and provides high performance while keeping low hardware requirements.

The unified network & services management approach has been proven with a large number of installations in key industry sectors like energy, finance, manufacturing, retail, telecommunications, and many more.

With this all-in-one NMS approach, Infosim revolutionizes the management of large heterogeneous network infrastructures.

Infosim

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Athenahealth, Barratt, Nocsult, Nucleus Connect, SCC

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. StableNet

December 2025

Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. StableNet

Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. StableNet and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScienceLogic vs. StableNet report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.