We performed a comparison between SAP SuccessFactors and ZingHR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud HCM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."SAP SuccessFactors is stable, we have not found any bugs or glitches."
"What I like most about SAP SuccessFactors are its recruiting and compensation features."
"They have succeeded in sustaining a powerful system supporting their philosophy."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten...It is a stable solution."
"It is a scalable solution."
"This solution provides up with an easy way to on/off-board staff, as well as actioning internal transfers."
"The most valuable features of SAP SuccessFactors are onboarding, recruiting, marketing, and performance."
"The performance of the solution is very good."
"The most valuable feature of ZingHR is the data bulk uploading and downloading."
"The solution is a cloud HRMS, which makes it a self-sufficient model. You can do a lot of things without taking anybody's help."
"SuccessFactors feels rigid. It should be more streamlined. Also, the interface design is outdated and needs an upgrade."
"There is not much scope for enhancements, personalization, or customization with the cloud-based variant of this solution, which could be improved."
"The GUI needs to be enhanced to be in line with the latest and complete version of the solution."
"There are some limiting aspects to this product."
"The stability could be a bit better."
"SuccessFactors' experience management is not so user-friendly."
"Its overall integration and user experience can be improved. SuccessFactors is a system that is built out of three different systems. The elements part was bought from Plateau, and the original performance dialogue was built by SuccessFactors itself. After that, SAP bought it, and it hasn't improved in the last few years. SuccessFactors is a perfect tool if you use it the way it is meant to be, but if you start building custom sessions and try to use it differently, then it is a total mess. It is not agile. It is like an old Mastodon truck or whatever. We don't have the Employee Central and Competence Management modules. Our company made the choice to not implement the Employee Central module. We also didn't implement the Competence Management module. We use the learning module to do some competence management, but I am not that fond of it. It would have been best to have the whole suite. SAP should never sell this without selling the whole suite because it just doesn't work. The biggest gain for me would be having the possibility of doing strategic personnel planning and managing internal mobility. If it could be used for social purposes, such as creating communities and connecting with media channels, that would be perfect. It should also have the possibilities for local admin and agile product development."
"SAP SuccessFactors can improve the recruitment module and artificial intelligence features. More powerful analytics are needed."
"ZingHR could improve by giving administration users from the front end the ability to make corrections. I am having to do the bulk corrections from an Excel upload from the system."
"ZingHR is not flexible and needs to improve offline support."
SAP SuccessFactors is ranked 1st in Cloud HCM with 90 reviews while ZingHR is ranked 18th in Cloud HCM with 2 reviews. SAP SuccessFactors is rated 7.8, while ZingHR is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors writes "Offers many useful modules and integrations, and helps companies adhere to best practices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ZingHR writes "A cloud-oriented HRMS that needs to be more flexible and improve offline support ". SAP SuccessFactors is most compared with SAP HCM, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and UKG, whereas ZingHR is most compared with DarwinBox, PeopleStrong , SAP HCM and greytHR. See our SAP SuccessFactors vs. ZingHR report.
See our list of best Cloud HCM vendors.
We monitor all Cloud HCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.