We performed a comparison between ReadyAPI and SmartBear TestLeft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The great thing about ReadyAPI is that it has a wide variety of functions. You can test any API that you come across. You are not limited to one type of API. It supports many APIs."
"ReadyAPI's best features are that it's user-friendly and its behavior-driven development is flexible."
"The most valuable feature has been the assertion as a test step as this has allowed us to increase the scope of testing and validation."
"The two most valuable features we use are the functional test and the security test."
"When we are doing API testing we have found it to be very efficient to receive results. Additionally, you are able to do tests directly from the API."
"ReadyAPI's best features are user-friendliness, smooth integration with Postman, the speed of creating test cases, and integration with customer data."
"It's easy to implement."
"The most valuable feature is being able to run each version for test suites."
"The most valuable features are test executor and development."
"The initial setup could be less complex."
"The reporting in ReadyAPI could be better. It can become sloppy, sometimes it works and other times it does not."
"Performance and memory management both need to be improved because other solutions use less memory for the same amount of data."
"In terms of features, I have already raised different change requests on the ReadyAPI side. One of the largest functions I've requested is the validation of the payload for the REST APIs."
"The reporting is not very robust and needs to be improved."
"Can be improved by including an inherent feature for UI automation."
"ReadyAPI can improve because it is limited to only SOAP and REST services. They should update the solution to include more protocols so that other people are not limited to SOAP and REST services. Other than would be able to utilize it."
"Better compatibility or more support for the older versions would be helpful."
"TestLeft captures a lot of space in terms of memory, which is one issue that can be improved."
Earn 20 points
ReadyAPI is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 34 reviews while SmartBear TestLeft is ranked 33rd in Functional Testing Tools. ReadyAPI is rated 7.8, while SmartBear TestLeft is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes "Allows you to parameterize in one place for the changes to reflect everywhere and lets you customize the environment, but its load testing feature needs improvement, and costs need to be cheaper". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestLeft writes "Simple to set up and the test execute feature is helpful, but the cost could be reduced". ReadyAPI is most compared with Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, ReadyAPI Test and SmartBear TestComplete, whereas SmartBear TestLeft is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.