ReadyAPI Test vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

SmartBear and Progress Software are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3, while Progress Software is ranked #24. SmartBear holds a 0.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Progress Software’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

1,619 Views
324 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,210 Views
895 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ReadyAPI Test and Telerik Test Studio are well-established competitors in the test automation sector for software development. ReadyAPI Test excels in API testing, while Telerik Test Studio is preferred for its versatility across multiple testing domains.

Features: ReadyAPI Test facilitates user-friendly API testing, advanced reporting, and supports numerous protocols, making it an ideal choice for API-centric tasks. On the other hand, Telerik Test Studio offers a broad spectrum of testing, including web, desktop, and load testing, appealing to developers who require a variety of testing options. Its multifaceted features give it an edge over ReadyAPI Test in environments requiring expansive testing across different platforms.

Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test could enhance its capabilities by expanding beyond API testing to cover more test environments. Its feature set could also be optimized for better integration with diverse system architectures. Lastly, improving user interface navigation can further enhance usability. Telerik Test Studio would benefit from more competitive pricing to appeal to smaller businesses. Enhanced reporting output to provide more actionable insights can improve decision-making. Additionally, streamlining the learning curve for first-time users can facilitate faster onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test is favored for its seamless deployment with strong CI support and detailed documentation; however, its customer service focuses more on self-service options. Conversely, Telerik Test Studio provides a user-friendly installation process alongside dedicated customer service, offering personalized assistance and gaining a reputation for tailored involvement in client deployment processes.

Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test is praised for its cost-effective pricing structure, widely viewed as delivering excellent value, particularly for API testing. Although higher priced, Telerik Test Studio is perceived to offer substantial ROI for projects needing extensive testing across various platforms, with its pricing justified by comprehensive testing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed ReadyAPI Test vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test vs. Telerik Test Studio

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

21st

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (9th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

24th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (15th), Test Automation Tools (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Luis Sanchez

Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba

Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others."

"It clearly makes it easy to test APIs based on the SOAP protocol. We are a logistics company, and we have lots of tracking calls coming in. We provide APIs for tracking services, and it makes sense for us to use SoapUI to test them thoroughly."

"SoapUI is uncomplicated and user-friendly."

"API mockups, functional testing, and load testing are valuable features."

"The tool’s scalability is very good."

"SoapUI Pro is a good tool when it comes to API design and orchestration. Additionally, it is beneficial for functional and for performance testing."

"The utmost importance lies in the performance of the application."

"The solution scales well."

Cons

"There are no bugs or glitches, but a few features available only in the Pro version could be made available in the open-source version. Some of the features do not necessarily need to be only available to Pro users. The data generator would be really useful for the open-source version users."

"Automation features are not user-friendly."

"There aren't any plugins for UI automation. You need to make a custom code and download a job to put into the libraries. If it were panelized, then it would be straightforward. It should be in a panel of the tools, so you can add those tools as your test step in your test cases."

"Could integrate the graphing module for load testing."

"The UI could be a bit more flexible."

"SoapUI would benefit from some more customization abilities. It's a good interface, but it would be nice if they added the ability to build custom dashboards where the user can do their own bar graphs and pie charts."

"Grouping of the cases is not possible in SoapUI, to my knowledge. When working with critical cases or the, we were not able to group them properly. We can definitely create a suite and add them there, but within a whole suite, we have to identify them, which was not easy."

"ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"The cost is not that bad."

"It is free of charge."

"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Insurance Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SoapUI Pro?

The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SoapUI Pro?

ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI Pro?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 57% of the time

ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 7% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Studio vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 6% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

August 2025

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

August 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

SoapUI NG Pro

No data available

Overview

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

SmartBear

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test vs. Telerik Test Studio

August 2025

Free Report: ReadyAPI Test vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about ReadyAPI Test vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ReadyAPI Test vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.