OpenText Functional Testing and Telerik Test Studio compete in automated software testing. Telerik Test Studio has an advantage due to its user-friendly interface and robust integration capabilities, appealing to those seeking advanced testing options.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing is known for script maintenance, seamless IT integration, and robust test management. Telerik Test Studio stands out with visual test recording, mobile testing, and CI/CD pipeline integration, offering broad testing functionalities.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing could enhance its user interface design, offer more flexible integration options, and improve mobile test capabilities. Telerik Test Studio may benefit from reducing its learning curve for beginners, streamlining pricing, and extending reporting features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing uses traditional deployment models with strong support. In contrast, Telerik Test Studio offers cloud-based deployment with enhanced customer service, simplifying onboarding and providing flexible support structures.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing typically has a lower initial setup cost and is cost-effective for enterprises with established systems. Telerik Test Studio requires more upfront investment but promises significant ROI through advanced features and flexibility.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.8% |
| Telerik Test Studio | 1.1% |
| Other | 90.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
