Pronto Xi vs SAP ERP comparison

"I find Pronto Xi quite robust, fast, and flexible in its use because we can set up any environment and customize it, and it covers a wide range of functions, starting from basic finances such as accounts receivable, payable, down to service projects, manufacturing, plant maintenance, and all customer relationships, providing extensive functionality."

"Pronto Xi is very user-friendly, and anyone can operate it without difficulty, unlike SAP or AS/400."

"MDG provides a central location for governance of the creation/updating processes of master data. It allows you to change several fields in the same object. For example, we can change a field on the purchasing view and change another field on an accounting view to the same material at the same time."

"The best thing that SAP ERP has is the extensive coverage of processes for every field and business unit such as procurement, inventory, financials, asset management, plant maintenance, and production. We can cover up to 99.9% processes of our organization, which is the best thing about this solution. It also has a very good capability to integrate with other applications. The security and authorization level of SAP ERP is very high. No other solution can match this level."

"The most significant elements of this solution are the ability to create a virtual product, a service product, and delivery."

"It provides great visibility into the details of enterprise resource planning."

"ERP is stable. The outcome is clear to us as far as the design goes."

"It provides one overview of the capacity planning."

"The stability and performance are good."

"This is a robust solution with a lot of control measures."

"The areas of Pronto Xi that could be improved include its appearance, which is quite outdated, as it does not use modern visualization means of its functionality, and it appears to be from the late 90s."

"There are a lot of things to be developed in Pronto Xi. I believe we need spool files, better control of inventory levels, and improved distribution capabilities."

"I do not have any notes for improvements."

"Reporting is why most companies need to acquire business intelligence add-on solutions, and when it comes to SAP ERP, they could improve the reporting graphical representation of the data."

"It would also help if it were more open, more flexible, with more standard products."

"In general, a user should attend training before they can use this platform. There's definitely a learning curve. As a new user or employee, there may be some difficulty with onboarding."

"It could be more flexible, and the company should be able to adapt the system. Not the other way around. It's very rigid and difficult to change. Reporting could also be better."

"SAP needs to be more intuitive."

"There are a lot of manual tasks that are used by a lot of people, so it is a very good candidate for RPA."

"SAP ERP's initial setup phase needs to be simplified."

"The solution is expensive and is best-suited for large enterprises."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. SAP ERP is a costly tool."

"SAP ERP is an expensive tool."

"The solution has moved from a licensing model to a rights-based, subscription model in the cloud."

"The pricing is based on the license per user, which I think makes the solution a bit costly...Basically, the prices of the solution are high, and we don't have that much revenue."

"My company makes early payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product. There are no additional costs apart from the charges paid toward the subscription-based license offered by SAP."

"SAP is a bit on the costly side, but they also provide support and other things. We are paying for licenses and the use of the cloud."

"There is a license needed to use this solution."