Pronto Xi vs SAP ERP comparison

"Pronto Xi is very user-friendly, and anyone can operate it without difficulty, unlike SAP or AS/400."

"I find Pronto Xi quite robust, fast, and flexible in its use because we can set up any environment and customize it, and it covers a wide range of functions, starting from basic finances such as accounts receivable, payable, down to service projects, manufacturing, plant maintenance, and all customer relationships, providing extensive functionality."

"Good customization features."

"ERP is stable. The outcome is clear to us as far as the design goes."

"SAP has provided a much more integrated platform for managing our manufacturing business."

"ERP is very stable."

"The implementation is very straightforward."

"The most valuable features are the claim management."

"SAP is a very process controlled application. It does not allow users to manage the data. Once the initial process is set, it works smoothly."

"I like the solution's ability to close plans and resource requirements in deals."

"The areas of Pronto Xi that could be improved include its appearance, which is quite outdated, as it does not use modern visualization means of its functionality, and it appears to be from the late 90s."

"There are a lot of things to be developed in Pronto Xi. I believe we need spool files, better control of inventory levels, and improved distribution capabilities."

"It is a little difficult to use."

"The user interface isn't as nice as SAP HANA's."

"It could always be cheaper. There is no doubt about it."

"Could be more user friendly."

"I think we have not seen any tangible benefits from SAP ERP."

"The solution is quite expensive. They need to work on the pricing to make it more reasonable."

"The problem with SAP is that whenever there is a modification, or if a new field needs to be added, they charge tens of thousands, hundreds, or even two hundred thousand dollars. That is not anything in which I am really interested. For instance, consider a single-use case. I have to enter the root causes for a certain operation or failure. That option does not exist anywhere in SAP, not in manufacturing, not in logistics, not in anything. It is completely missing. The root cause analysis is very common across industries, yet SAP does not offer this option. A line field or a metaparticle, for example, was delayed. If you have the choice to input the warehouse operator or if the person who submitted the document has the opportunity to enter, this has been postponed for N, X, Y, or Z reasons."

"It is not flexible for the users. SAP works in a specific way, and the users and the processes have to adapt to the way it works. It is hard to customize it to the level that we need for our work. It is not easy to get new extensions for process functions, modules, or activities."

"SAP ECC is not cheap but I consider it the best system for managing an organization's data and processes."

"SAP is quite expensive."

"When we talk about pricing it is expensive. On a scale of one to ten, it would rank a two. There are no additional fees but the user licenses are high."

"The on-premises licensing model comes with annual maintenance whereas the cloud-based licensing model is a yearly subscription. The tool’s pricing is normal and not expensive."

"SAP ERP is expensive."

"I rate SAP ERP's pricing a six or seven out of ten."

"I am not sure. However, extensions cost approximately $100,000 or$200,000."

"Licensing can vary, but for educational institutions, there are often favorable conditions."