Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
With more automation in the SOC and the implementation of the next generation SOC, the headcount required for around-the-clock monitoring of ever increasing IT assets has gone down drastically.
Securiti reduced my manual effort by thirty to forty percent, although my goal is to achieve a hundred percent reduction.
I have reached out to technical support for troubleshooting SAML certificate mismatches and federated errors between Ping and enterprise apps.
The team in Asia-Pacific has been particularly supportive and generous with partners, providing comprehensive assistance and material.
On average, I would rate the technical support four out of ten.
We've got a dedicated engineer, and when we get someone, we get the answer.
I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability.
The tools allow for quick building and testing, reducing overall deployment time.
Securiti's scalability is impressive; it is capable of handling a large workload for a bank having 25,000 plus branches and a customer base of around 400 million customers.
We manage the environment well, and the clients manage it, so it's not crashing.
Overall, its stability compares well to other products.
The top executive or the C-level executives want to understand the impact of implementing the various cyber security solutions in terms of the reduction, tangible reduction in the business risk.
I would like to enable ServiceNow Generative AI for auto-diagnosing PingFederate SSO failures and suggest remediation steps.
Ping Identity Platform has multiple products for access management, identity management, a solution for API security, a solution for authorization, and a product for identity verification.
It would be beneficial if Securiti had a feature similar to data mesh, allowing users to directly access remote data through the Securiti UI.
It's hard to estimate the cost. They should help with the cost estimation.
Despite them having connectors and ongoing product improvements, there are challenges with data lineage and updating relationships modules that don't match OneTrust's capabilities.
Vovalage was more affordable than Securiti.
It's hard to estimate the cost.
Two years ago, it was much cheaper, but now it is more expensive.
The platform enhances security measures by analyzing multi-factor authentication attempts, highlighting suspicious patterns, and generating compliance reports.
It's a converged platform which can do both identity management, access management, and recently they are bringing privilege management capability as well.
A specific feature I find effective is the sensitive data intelligence (SDA) module, which is very useful for automating compliance processes.
I find the zero trust network, zero trust architecture, ZTA, most valuable and unique in Securiti.
Their data discovery is a fantastic product. It is AI-enabled for automatic tagging and classifiers.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Ping Identity Platform | 0.6% |
| Securiti | 2.0% |
| Other | 97.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
Securiti is the pioneer of the Data Command Center, a centralized platform that enables the safe use of data and GenAI. It provides unified data intelligence, controls and orchestration across hybrid multicloud environments. Large global enterprises rely on Securiti's Data Command Center for data security, privacy, governance, and compliance.
Securiti has been recognized with numerous industry and analyst awards, including "Most Innovative Startup" by RSA, "Top 25 Machine Learning Startups" by Forbes, "Most Innovative AI Companies" by CB Insights, "Cool Vendor in Data Security" by Gartner, and "Privacy Management Wave Leader" by Forrester.
For more information, please visit Securiti.ai and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
