"The two-factor login is great. I receive a message and just have to press okay."
"It is a good solution for hybrid environments and VPN."
"It meets our security needs very well. It is easy to use, and documentation is also available. It is also very stable and scalable, and its support is also very good. We are satisfied with this solution."
"The multi-factor authentication process and the geo-locking features are great."
"The push notifications and the integrations they offer are valuable. Their mobile app is very useful. It is very easy to use."
"It helps to quickly get access to the pages I need."
"Their split tunneling feature has been very valuable to our company since implementing the Perimeter 81 solution."
"The solution provides us with an easy way to configure and join the VPN with Perimeter 81."
"It connects quickly and stays connected. The user interface is pretty neat too. The app has in-house support with user guides that give you step-by-step walkthroughs on navigating the app. In addition, there is a live chat feature that offers prompt assistance on the go."
"The ZPA is a unique feature which offers VPN along with all the additional security needed."
"The dashboard needs to be improved."
"We had some trouble with the password reset function."
"Certain customers can not use this product because it is cloud-based."
"Its documentation must be in French because we are a French-speaking country. They should also provide more training documentation. Its management interface should also be improved. They should also improve its update period. If I compare its update period with other products such as Palo Alto firewalls, this solution is really slow in updates."
"The only time I really had some negative feedback for them was about the UI of their mobile app, but they improved it in the last version. It is good on the functionality side, but their pricing model is a little bit weird. Currently, there is no price advantage in signing up for yearly contracts. If you are on a monthly term or a yearly contract, you basically pay the same price, and that is very unusual. Normally, there is a discount when someone signs up for the 12-month system."
"I would suggest adding more networking and security features that allow more customization within their platform."
"If I were to be nitpicky, I would ask that Perimeter 81 offer the option for us to change the color of the graphical user interface, like maybe pink or green or so on."
"Currently, I am not able to define a different country or location, which can result in negative experiences as the tool is being recognized by websites and this can make it difficult to access them or force me to disable the program temporarily."
"In order to have to bypass the login using the website, a good feature for Perimeter 81 to have is a login instance in the Perimeter 81 application. I'm using a Mac and we don't have that functionality."
"It's an expensive solution."
Perimeter 81 is the first Cybersecurity Experience Platform to streamline SASE through its groundbreaking ease-of-use and unified network security stack. With a global network of PoPs, Perimeter 81 offers secure network capabilities managed over our multi-tenant cloud and highly scalable for organizations worldwide.
With Perimeter 81, you can easily move your resources to the cloud, manage team member access from anywhere and gain network visibility in an all-in-one cloud management portal. With features like Firewall as a Service, Device Posture Check, Web Filtering and more, you can secure and manage your network in just a few clicks.
Why Perimeter 81?
Network security doesn’t have to be complicated – join Perimeter 81 on a mission to radically simplify the cybersecurity experience.
Zscaler Private Access delivers policy-based, secure access to private applications and assets without the cost, hassle, or security risks of a VPN. Using the Zscaler App, users can now get all of the benefits of Zscaler’s Cloud Security Platform for Internet traffic, as well as granular, policy-based access to internal resources from a single point.
More Information: https://www.zscaler.com/produc...
Perimeter 81 is ranked 9th in ZTNA as a Service with 4 reviews while Zscaler Private Access is ranked 5th in ZTNA as a Service with 1 review. Perimeter 81 is rated 9.6, while Zscaler Private Access is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Perimeter 81 writes "Helpful technical support with great single sign-on functionality and a seamless login experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Private Access writes "Provides us with ease of access to VPN while providing security for our networks". Perimeter 81 is most compared with Cato Networks, Zscaler SASE, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cisco Umbrella and Pulse Secure Pulse SDP, whereas Zscaler Private Access is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Okta Workforce Identity, Netskope Private Access and OpenVPN Access Server.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.