Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pega Robotic Process Automation vs Vertical Solutions VContactCenter comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Pega Robotic Process Automa...
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (20th)
Vertical Solutions VContact...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
CRM Customer Engagement Centers (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Pega Robotic Process Automation and Vertical Solutions VContactCenter aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Pega Robotic Process Automation is designed for Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and holds a mindshare of 2.9%, up 2.9% compared to last year.
Vertical Solutions VContactCenter, on the other hand, focuses on CRM Customer Engagement Centers, holds 2.1% mindshare, up 1.4% since last year.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Pega Robotic Process Automation2.9%
UiPath Platform12.9%
Microsoft Power Automate11.5%
Other72.7%
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
CRM Customer Engagement Centers Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Vertical Solutions VContactCenter2.1%
Microsoft Dynamics CRM13.2%
Salesforce Service Cloud10.8%
Other73.9%
CRM Customer Engagement Centers
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1458102 - PeerSpot reviewer
Regional Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Has raised concerns due to outdated framework and high ownership costs
Pega Robotic Process Automation is a temporary solution to a bigger issue, and the cost of implementation especially with Pega really stops customers from proceeding. The total cost of ownership could be improved. From a technical perspective, the product performs adequately. The installation can be quite complex as it's not standalone, and customers need to get the whole Pega platform up and running. The total cost of ownership is not very attractive. RPA as a concept is outdated now, with agentic AI becoming more prominent. We don't see much interest from customers in going down the RPA route; Pega Robotic Process Automation is losing its prominence in the market.
Use Vertical Solutions VContactCenter?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise17
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pega Robotic Process Automation?
The solution's automation handling capability has positively impacted the overall automation process in my experience.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pega Robotic Process Automation?
I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive.
What needs improvement with Pega Robotic Process Automation?
Pega Robotic Process Automation is a temporary solution to a bigger issue, and the cost of implementation especially with Pega really stops customers from proceeding. The total cost of ownership co...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Pega RPA, OpenSpan
VContactCenter, Vertical Solutions ContactCenter
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

eBay Enterprise, M&I Bank
A.O.Smith, DPSciences, City of Sioux Falls, ACCO Brands, Sprint, eProtex, ABB, Mitsubishi, Fujitsu, Rubbermaid, Lumenate
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Microsoft and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: January 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.