Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs RedSeal comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Palo Alto Networks Logo
6,748 views|3,352 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
RedSeal Logo
31 views|23 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks Panorama and RedSeal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Firewall Security Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Palo Alto Networks Panorama provides many features, such as alerts, traffic monitoring, and logs.""It's helpful that the solution allows us to control all the firewalls from one device.""The solution is absolutely stable.""The compliance features are very effective at identifying things that need to be properly hardened.""Palo Alto technical support is excellent.""Panorama is very easy, easy to administrate, and easy to control.""Palo Alto Networks Panorama has a lot of features.""The application ID or App-ID feature is a good feature for us. We are also using IPS and content inspection features. The firewall can inspect the packages that are passing through my network."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Pros →

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score.""RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out.""The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

More RedSeal Pros →

Cons
"It is not a cheap product.""They need to do less bug-related releases and create versions that are stable for at least six months at a time. I don't find this issue in other solutions like Cisco, Check Point, FortiGate, or others. Those just provide a patch if there is a bug and we don't have to worry about downtime.""As the cybersecurity threats have become more aggressive these days, Palo Alto Networks Panorama can still be improved, particularly on the security side, for example, more network management, and penetration test. Improving the security feature for internal endpoints is needed in the solution.""Panorama needs to work on its configuration issues.""Instead of searching their knowledge base in their website, maybe they can interact with us in the user interface to explain things better.""The product does need a bit of configuration. It's not quite ready to go out of the box.""The initial setup requires expertise and can be a bit complex.""Customer support can improve."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Cons →

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency.""Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus.""The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

More RedSeal Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is high compared to other vendors in the same space. Licensing is also fairly high for different functions to be added on."
  • "With the URL filtering, we probably went down from around four hours in response time to about five minutes."
  • "The licensing is not cheap. There are always hidden costs. You have support costs, or maybe you need to buy more optics on how the solution fits into the rest of your environment. It is possible some of the rest of your environment will need to change too."
  • "It has freed up staff time, which is where we are seeing ROI."
  • "Initially, Palo Alto looks expensive, but if you dig deeper then you will find that it is very comparable, or even cheaper than other solutions."
  • "You only pay for the license and there are no additional costs."
  • "We pay approximately $3,000 a year in order to use the product."
  • "The pricing model is reasonable for this class of solutions."
  • More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."
  • More RedSeal Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable aspect of Palo Alto Networks Panorama for me is the centralized management of multiple firewalls.
    Top Answer:In terms of pricing, Palo Alto Networks Panorama is moderate. It is very affordable when compared to more expensive firewalls. The license is yearly, and the price typically includes the initial… more »
    Top Answer:In the future, it would be beneficial if Panorama could include a firewall assurance feature similar to Skybox. While each firewall has its policy optimizer, a consolidated policy optimizer in… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    6,748
    Comparisons
    3,352
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    412
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    31
    Comparisons
    23
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Panorama network security management provides static rules and dynamic security updates in an ever-changing threat landscape. Reduce administrator workload and improve your overall security posture with a single rule base for firewall, threat prevention, URL filtering, application awareness, user identification, file blocking and data filtering.

    RedSeal’s network modeling and risk scoring platform builds an accurate, up-to-date model of an organization’s entire, as-built network to visualize access paths, prioritize what to fix, so you can target existing cybersecurity resources to protect your most valuable assets. With RedSeal’s Digital Resilience Score, decision makers can see the security status and benchmark progress toward digital resilience.

    Sample Customers
    University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
    United States Postal Service, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Interval International
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Pharma/Biotech Company7%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Firewall Security Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 80 reviews while RedSeal is ranked 20th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4, while RedSeal is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RedSeal writes "Provides a graphical overview of our network and is easy to deploy, but needs a user-friendly interface and a feature for compliance audit policy". Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, AlgoSec, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Tufin Orchestration Suite and FireMon Security Manager, whereas RedSeal is most compared with Skybox Security Suite, AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Ekahau Site Survey and Darktrace.

    We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.