No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs Tines comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
21st
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tines
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), AI-Powered Security Automation (2nd), AI IT Support (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tines is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tines1.1%
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus1.3%
Other97.6%
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
 

Featured Reviews

Tejas Jain - PeerSpot reviewer
Principle Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Seamless integration into existing ecosystem empowers effective threat detection
The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is its seamless integration into the Palo Alto Networks ecosystem, allowing the threat intelligence feeds to be automatically consumed without manual effort. It uses the STIX format, which is automatically understood by the firewalls. AutoFocus also excels in behavioral analytics and reputation scoring, providing thorough threat analysis.
Michael Marth - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Of Application Security at RBC
Automation has reduced manual security work and now improves response time and consistency
One of the things that should be improved is the user interface. The user interface is hard to work with, especially if you are a beginner. It has many features and complicated steps. You have to click many times to get to a feature. I would also like to see ready-made templates for common security tasks, such as phishing investigations and suspicious login responses. That would help us start automation very quickly. Another improvement would be better monitoring for failed automation. If a workflow stops because a connected tool is unavailable, it should provide a more detailed explanation and automatic recovery options. This would make troubleshooting much easier.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is very easy to install and set up AutoFocus."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."
"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."
"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has had a positive impact on my company as we can reduce the cost for the SOC investment, and we can also get good feedback on how to strengthen our network from the expertise people available."
"Tines is a very solid tool overall; once you get used to it, it makes work much easier and saves a whole lot of time."
"The best thing is that it's no code, so it doesn't require coding knowledge."
"Tines has positively impacted my organization because automation has brought a lot of changes, reducing a lot of effort and providing fast time to value."
"For our repetitive security workflows, Tines has reduced manual investigation time and has reduced the number of workers on the security team from 20 to 5 people."
"It proved that we could build enterprise-grade reliability into our backend without writing a line of custom Python script."
"The tool was vendor-neutral."
"One of the most valuable features is that it’s a low-code solution."
"The best advantage is the no-code automation, excellent customer support services, and ease of integration with other tools."
 

Cons

"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."
"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is not affordable."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
"It must be on-premises as well; it must have a server on-premises. It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"There were one or two instances where firewalls were not getting the threat intelligence feeds."
"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."
"There are three things that I would say could be better."
"They started implementing some AI, and their AI is isolated."
"The setup time is considerable; it takes time to set it up, and the learning curve is steep."
"Tines was a little bit more expensive than Torq."
"Reporting and dashboards could be more advanced for deeper analysis."
"One of the things that should be improved is the user interface."
"Maybe Tines can add more features and demonstrations, like videos on how to use the features within the tool."
"The areas where Tines can be improved include the human, AI, plus automation model."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."
"The solution is reasonably priced."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.
909,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
13%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I feel that Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus can improve, especially since most of the OEMs are implementing MDR, Managed Service feature, which is still not available with Palo Alto. The MDR feature i...
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus for threat monitoring, and it is provided by the OEM itself. I use the threat data correlation feature, which correlates with Cortex. We can use it for data corre...
What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
As a partner with Palo Alto Networks, my email is Sarvajit at bsrgroup.in. My job title is Technical Manager. I confirm that we will publish these reviews on peerspot.com in written or audio format...
What needs improvement with Tines?
Tines is overall good, but the setup can feel a bit technical at first. More templates for common workflows would make it much easier to start quickly without building everything from scratch. I ca...
What is your primary use case for Tines?
My main use case for Tines has been automation. My main use has been automating simple workflows, such as moving data between tools, sending alerts, and handling routine tasks. This work gets faste...
What advice do you have for others considering Tines?
My advice would be to start simple. The main thing is that you need to build small workflows first. When you build small workflows, you understand how it works on a bigger and more complex side. If...
 

Also Known As

Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Telkom Indonesia
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. Tines and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
909,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.