We performed a comparison between Cisco Threat Grid and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, NetWitness, Recorded Future and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.
"It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier interface for many users to interact with."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
Cisco Threat Grid crowd-sources malware from a closed community and analyzes all samples using proprietary, highly secure techniques that include static and dynamic (sandboxing) analysis. It correlates the results with hundreds of millions of other analyzed malware artifacts to provide a global view of malware attacks, campaigns, and their distribution. Security teams can quickly correlate a single samples of observed activity and characteristics against millions of other samples to fully understand its behaviors in a historical and global context. This ability helps analysts effectively defend against both targeted attacks and the broader threats from advanced malware. Threat Grid’s detailed reports, including the identification of important behavioral indicators and the assignment of threat scores, let you quickly prioritize and recover from advanced attacks.
AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.
Cisco Threat Grid is ranked 10th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 14th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. Cisco Threat Grid is rated 9.0, while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Threat Grid writes "Is easy to implement, has good documentation, and is scalable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". Cisco Threat Grid is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, ReversingLabs Titanium Platform, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), AT&T AlienVault USM and Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, whereas Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with Mandiant Advantage, Recorded Future, Anomali ThreatStream, IBM X-Force and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP).
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.