Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Threat Grid and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, NetWitness, Recorded Future and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: December 2022).
655,774 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well."

More Cisco Threat Grid Pros →

"The most valuable feature is alerting.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros →

Cons
"I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier interface for many users to interact with."

More Cisco Threat Grid Cons →

"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "If I remember correctly, the licensing cost is a little bit higher than that of the competitor."
  • More Cisco Threat Grid Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    655,774 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well.
    Top Answer:If I remember correctly, the licensing cost is a little bit higher than that of the competitor.
    Top Answer:The last time I checked, I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier… more »
    Top Answer:At times in AutoFocus, when you have a homegrown application or you check another threat intelligence feed, it's not malicious but is still categorized as gray. We need to request a change in the… more »
    Top Answer:We are using AutoFocus with my playbooks. We use it on a daily basis. We receive alerts on the Playbook. We receive alerts for threat intelligence, malware alerts, and virus alerts. We use Autofocus… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    847
    Comparisons
    558
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    1,421
    Comparisons
    794
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    398
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Threat Grid, ThreatGrid
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco Threat Grid crowd-sources malware from a closed community and analyzes all samples using proprietary, highly secure techniques that include static and dynamic (sandboxing) analysis. It correlates the results with hundreds of millions of other analyzed malware artifacts to provide a global view of malware attacks, campaigns, and their distribution. Security teams can quickly correlate a single samples of observed activity and characteristics against millions of other samples to fully understand its behaviors in a historical and global context. This ability helps analysts effectively defend against both targeted attacks and the broader threats from advanced malware. Threat Grid’s detailed reports, including the identification of important behavioral indicators and the assignment of threat scores, let you quickly prioritize and recover from advanced attacks.

    AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

    Offer
    Learn more about Cisco Threat Grid
    Learn more about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
    Sample Customers
    Center for Internet Security (CIS), ADP
    Telkom Indonesia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government10%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Threat Intelligence Platforms
    December 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, NetWitness, Recorded Future and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: December 2022.
    655,774 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Threat Grid is ranked 10th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 14th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. Cisco Threat Grid is rated 9.0, while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Threat Grid writes "Is easy to implement, has good documentation, and is scalable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". Cisco Threat Grid is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, ReversingLabs Titanium Platform, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), AT&T AlienVault USM and Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, whereas Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with Mandiant Advantage, Recorded Future, Anomali ThreatStream, IBM X-Force and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP).

    See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.