We performed a comparison between PageUp People and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The talent acquisition and the onboarding components of the system are most valuable."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"When you maintain your data in SAP, you can generate any kind of HR report with one click."
"Customers can create custom infotypes to store any custom data points."
"HCM is a very important module that each organization should want to use. It will help any organization to calculate and control the cost of their human resources."
"The payroll and time management features are useful."
"They provide the most stable and powerful technology in the areas of human resources, information systems, and ERP."
"We have features such as ABKRS based on the client's requirement, tariff and TMSTA, and so on."
"The technical support is quite good."
"They could probably add surveying, as in engagement surveys, to their product. That would be something that would be valued by their customers. For instance, Culture Amp is a product that does a lot of the engagement stuff. They're diversifying into other aspects of talent management. It is not yet at the same scale as PageUp People, but it is an excellent product as well."
"The implementation of the solution can be a bit difficult. They should make it easier. If it could be as simple as the SuccessFactors implementation that would be ideal."
"SAP HCM needs to improve its UI."
"Managing changes in applications can be challenging since it complicates testing and unit testing, resulting in longer testing phases. This time-consuming process often leaves little room for actual work."
"It would be nice if the solution migrated to S/4HANA."
"SAP HCM has many different channels for communication with the consultants which makes it complex. There are delays when there is a problem."
"There are already success factors for the cloud solution which cannot be integrated into S/4 HANA."
"The current platform is quite rigid and not as flexible and end-user friendly as other HR solutions."
"SAP HCM cannot integrate with other third-party applications. One of the drawbacks we encounter with SAP HCM, specifically in payroll management, is the limitation regarding changing payroll areas within the same month. For instance, if an employee transitions from staff to non-staff status during the month, we face difficulties because the system doesn't allow us to change the payroll."
Earn 20 points
PageUp People is ranked 29th in Talent Management while SAP HCM is ranked 4th in Talent Management with 48 reviews. PageUp People is rated 7.8, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of PageUp People writes "Has all-inclusive pricing and good talent acquisition and onboarding components, and is an excellent product for mid-sized to large organizations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Efficiently handles the entire hire-to-retire cycle management within an organization and the ability to scale is outstanding". PageUp People is most compared with Workday, UKG and SAP SuccessFactors, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and PeopleSoft. See our PageUp People vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.