We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Benefits Administration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the fact that the annual days are calculated automatically and that if annual leave is taken in the future, those days are put on hold. You know at every point how many days of annual leave are you left with and how many are on hold."
"The performance goals and personal features of every employee with the dashboard is most valuable."
"We use this solution for our end to end HR needs from onboarding and hiring to learning."
"The scalability of BambooHR is good."
"It's great for helping users deal with their supply chain."
"I like the speed of the processing and how easy it is to use."
"PeopleSoft is mostly used for payroll and core HR functionality. Some customers use it for its finance module."
"PeopleSoft is a good core system. It has a lot of functionality. They frequently update the solution and recently they have added some good enhancements features for higher education. We just switched to the new fluid interface and that is working very well for us is very good."
"The most valuable feature of PeopleSoft is the functionality that allows the ability to find all the data about employees that are needed."
"PeopleSoft is resilient and has the flexibility for us to customize it."
"I'd like PeopleSoft to be like on the cloud and more mobile-friendly. If I try to access it from a cell phone, it's a bit difficult, so it would be great if PeopleSoft could improve these features."
"PeopleSoft is scalable."
"They have some interesting features in the learning space."
"Recently, the localization versions for different countries were increased, and that added value to the solution."
"The technical support is quite good."
"SAP HCM can handle a large number of employees. We can easily process payrolls and check the arrangements, and the client can also check the performance of the employees. Additionally, it has some advanced features."
"Technical support is excellent."
"SAP HCM has a good performance."
"When you maintain your data in SAP, you can generate any kind of HR report with one click."
"We've found that the solution has the capability to scale."
"In the BambooHR performance management annual evaluations we have some limits to the questions. We can only add four extra questions, and they already have three basic questions, this is not easy for us. We would like to have more flexibility with the questions."
"It would be useful to have the possibility to assign a task to the different users within the software."
"BambooHR could be improved by managing leave in a way that transfers remaining days at the end of the annual year to the following year."
"The color palettes could be changed to make the solution a little more attractive and easier to use."
"We have already deployed it and we have had it for several years but we are switching to a modern HCM SaaS cloud product."
"PeopleSoft could improve by being more user-friendly. It's somewhat awkward to navigate."
"I would like to see it become available again in Mexico."
"Response time takes very long and requires a person to be awake night and day to benefit from it."
"Tools and UI could be enhanced."
"PeopleSoft can improve by having proper connectors. It's very difficult to change some interfaces with the other systems."
"There can occasionally be complexity in the initial setup."
"Scalability is not there in PeopleSoft. Its performance and resilience are also very bad. When you're trying to stretch it, it breaks. It is not resilient. It is also not stable. It is stable as far as data is concerned, but the infrastructure is not stable."
"SAP HCM could improve by having more resources and making it more user-friendly. It is complex."
"The solution is rather expensive."
"It would be very helpful for our company if a new version was released with the ability to contain all of the things that we have newly introduced in our company."
"There needs to be a renovation of the interface and functionalities of the talent management modules."
"It would be nice if the solution migrated to S/4HANA."
"The current platform is quite rigid and not as flexible and end-user friendly as other HR solutions."
"The extensibility of the integration could be improved."
"SAP HCM has many different channels for communication with the consultants which makes it complex. There are delays when there is a problem."
PeopleSoft is ranked 3rd in Benefits Administration with 20 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 5th in Benefits Administration with 9 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP HCM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Mature with a variety of features and multiple use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Allows us to do all of our HR management processes, including payroll and personal administration". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle ERP Cloud, Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors and NetSuite ERP, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, UKG and ADP GlobalView HCM. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Benefits Administration vendors and best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Benefits Administration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
