No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Integration Cloud Se...
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (28th), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. Oracle Integration Cloud Service is designed for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) and holds a mindshare of 3.1%, down 6.9% compared to last year.
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 1.0% mindshare, up 0.8% since last year.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle Integration Cloud Service3.1%
Boomi iPaaS6.8%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform6.5%
Other83.6%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator1.0%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)3.7%
SSIS3.6%
Other91.7%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Kanhaiya Chandra - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Integration workflows have become faster and now simplify complex multi-system projects
Regarding data visibility in Oracle Integration Cloud Service, it raises questions about whether it is easy to work with and easy to use, particularly in the visualization of data in the product. I have not used machine learning features in Oracle Integration Cloud Service at all. I have sometimes explored the analytics tools in Oracle Integration Cloud Service, and I think they were pretty helpful and actually good. As for pricing for the product, with one being high and ten being a low price, I rate it as four, indicating it is on the higher side. I am not sure if my company is a partner with Oracle because we mainly work on the client instances. I would rate this product overall as an eight.
AC
Technical director at Cremete
Effective data transformation and integration in complex environments with high functionality
Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your hand on this environment is a very demanding task. This is the real problem. The problem is not about the product, but about the complexity to manage, to configure, to decide what to do. I have some experience using SAP R/3. It seems to me something similar. When you have to configure a situation with a client, especially for a client not in an industrial sector, but in a service sector, it is quite usual that you are in trouble for some reason. This is always the story that I found in the implementations I have done. Maybe there are only three or four big problems, in some other cases there are more than that, but this is the situation usually. For WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, not the same, but I must say it is quite often there is a need to put together some pieces and make it work in a coordinated way.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If a company is integrating this product with file-based integration, then it is very good."
"The return on investment is there, especially in terms of operations part, since maintenance administration or around 40% of the activities or efforts now happens automatically and, because it is ready to use and the majority of the services are available, there is a significant amount of time and labor savings in terms of effort reduction."
"It is a scalable solution."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"We will recommend this to all of our clients because it is a feature that Oracle is promoting, and it is working well for us."
"Overall, it's a very good product, offering a lot of stability and flexibility, and the initial setup is easy."
"As far as user friendliness goes, I loved it so far."
"They are a very good partner team so I don't think there are any areas of concern on that side."
"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."
"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."
"The learning curve for this solution is very good."
"It was mostly easy to set up the product."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the integration between core banking and other systems."
"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."
"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."
"The built-in connectors help with quick connectivity to the platforms, and we are using this for both our banking and insurance clients."
 

Cons

"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
"The product has to mature a lot more in terms of features and capabilities."
"Given that we're already paying for the database enterprise, why should we go and pay again for the PaaS."
"With JSON, if the tool provides support similar to XML, then it would be helpful."
"UI-based controls still have room to improve, but migration can be made simple."
"In terms of the area of improvement in the product, I would say that the way we design the services is very limited."
"At the moment I think, probably small, medium integrations are good. Bigger integrations could be developed, though availability and progressive recovery are not in place yet."
"The configuration of the product is not an easy task for everyone."
"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."
"The integration capabilities need to be improved."
"You cannot include the validation of XPath."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"The customization can be a bit difficult."
"The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems."
"They should release upgrades more frequently."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is good. It is reasonable and is priced well for the market segment. The model they use is on a per-package unit and we have a two-year subscription."
"The solution is cost-effective."
"Its pricing is relatively lower than other vendors."
"The price of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is reasonable to start with, but when you scale it becomes expensive."
"The solution is less expensive than other products."
"In the case of Oracle Integration Cloud, costs can be "predictable" as far as the platform and infrastructure are concerned."
"Oracle uses a universal credit model for OCI. Clients commit to an annual budget and can choose which products to use and build during their contract period. Billing is based on consumption - you're only billed for the products you use."
"The price is fair."
"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."
"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."
"It is a low-cost solution."
"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."
"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
913,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise28
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a fairly easy initial setup, and Oracle offers initial support and guidance for those who might find the setup to be challenging. There are complications that c...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
For the purchase process of the product, we mainly acquire it from the client side by getting a client instance; however, at TCS, we also have our own instance because we have purchased the product...
What needs improvement with Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
In terms of improvement for Oracle Integration Cloud Service, I would like the ability to call a Java function, not JavaScript, as they are already providing JavaScript functions. I am not experien...
What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?
Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your ...
What is your primary use case for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?
A typical use case for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is when I am in an interoperability environment with healthcare facilities and I have to put together a lot of applications that share some HL7 mes...
What advice do you have for others considering WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?
For simpler tasks or simpler use cases, we avoid using WSO2 Enterprise Integrator because it is quite complex. So it is easier to manage some more simple solutions than that. WSO2 Enterprise Integr...
 

Also Known As

Oracle ICS
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Calix, Avaya, Land Lakes, Leader, PWC, Vale
West
Find out what your peers are saying about Workato, Boomi, Informatica and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: September 2026.
913,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.