No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Integration Cloud Se...
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (28th), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. Oracle Integration Cloud Service is designed for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) and holds a mindshare of 3.1%, down 6.9% compared to last year.
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 1.0% mindshare, up 0.8% since last year.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle Integration Cloud Service3.1%
Boomi iPaaS6.8%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform6.5%
Other83.6%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator1.0%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)3.7%
SSIS3.6%
Other91.7%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Kanhaiya Chandra - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Integration workflows have become faster and now simplify complex multi-system projects
Regarding data visibility in Oracle Integration Cloud Service, it raises questions about whether it is easy to work with and easy to use, particularly in the visualization of data in the product. I have not used machine learning features in Oracle Integration Cloud Service at all. I have sometimes explored the analytics tools in Oracle Integration Cloud Service, and I think they were pretty helpful and actually good. As for pricing for the product, with one being high and ten being a low price, I rate it as four, indicating it is on the higher side. I am not sure if my company is a partner with Oracle because we mainly work on the client instances. I would rate this product overall as an eight.
AC
Technical director at Cremete
Effective data transformation and integration in complex environments with high functionality
Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your hand on this environment is a very demanding task. This is the real problem. The problem is not about the product, but about the complexity to manage, to configure, to decide what to do. I have some experience using SAP R/3. It seems to me something similar. When you have to configure a situation with a client, especially for a client not in an industrial sector, but in a service sector, it is quite usual that you are in trouble for some reason. This is always the story that I found in the implementations I have done. Maybe there are only three or four big problems, in some other cases there are more than that, but this is the situation usually. For WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, not the same, but I must say it is quite often there is a need to put together some pieces and make it work in a coordinated way.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup of Oracle Integration Cloud Service was easy."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"We mainly use the solution's ICS component."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"The return on investment is there, especially in terms of operations part, since maintenance administration or around 40% of the activities or efforts now happens automatically and, because it is ready to use and the majority of the services are available, there is a significant amount of time and labor savings in terms of effort reduction."
"The OIC is very good."
"If a company is integrating this product with file-based integration, then it is very good."
"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."
"The solution's customer service is good."
"The connectors have been the most impactful features for handling integrations. I can use these connectors when I need specific connectivity with a third party, like a core banking system in BFSI. I don't need to do all the development. I take the specific connector, put in the IP address and password, and it takes care of everything."
"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."
"The built-in connectors help with quick connectivity to the platforms, and we are using this for both our banking and insurance clients."
"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."
"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."
"It has improved our time management because development is quicker."
 

Cons

"I encountered a scenario where the environment had gone down for some time, even in production, and while it used to come up after five to seven minutes, I raised an Oracle SR to understand why it went down during those five to seven minutes."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
"Support at Oracle is good, but not excellent."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"It's one of the major factors for clients not choosing this product and it should be included in the API CS part of OIP."
"They should provide tutorials for beginners to learn about the processes."
"The configuration of the product is not an easy task for everyone."
"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."
"You cannot include the validation of XPath."
"They should release upgrades more frequently."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."
"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In the case of Oracle Integration Cloud, costs can be "predictable" as far as the platform and infrastructure are concerned."
"Its pricing is relatively lower than other vendors."
"It specifies how much data you use and how much storage you require, among other things."
"Oracle uses a universal credit model for OCI. Clients commit to an annual budget and can choose which products to use and build during their contract period. Billing is based on consumption - you're only billed for the products you use."
"The price is fair."
"The price of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is good. It is reasonable and is priced well for the market segment. The model they use is on a per-package unit and we have a two-year subscription."
"The price is cheaper than all other cloud integration providers."
"The solution is cost-effective."
"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."
"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."
"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."
"It is a low-cost solution."
"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."
"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
914,805 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise28
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a fairly easy initial setup, and Oracle offers initial support and guidance for those who might find the setup to be challenging. There are complications that c...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
For the purchase process of the product, we mainly acquire it from the client side by getting a client instance; however, at TCS, we also have our own instance because we have purchased the product...
What needs improvement with Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
In terms of improvement for Oracle Integration Cloud Service, I would like the ability to call a Java function, not JavaScript, as they are already providing JavaScript functions. I am not experien...
What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?
Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your ...
What is your primary use case for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?
A typical use case for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is when I am in an interoperability environment with healthcare facilities and I have to put together a lot of applications that share some HL7 mes...
What advice do you have for others considering WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?
For simpler tasks or simpler use cases, we avoid using WSO2 Enterprise Integrator because it is quite complex. So it is easier to manage some more simple solutions than that. WSO2 Enterprise Integr...
 

Also Known As

Oracle ICS
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Calix, Avaya, Land Lakes, Leader, PWC, Vale
West
Find out what your peers are saying about Workato, Boomi, Informatica and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: September 2026.
914,805 professionals have used our research since 2012.