WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs webMethods.io comparison

IBM and WSO2 are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7, while WSO2 is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 10.5% mindshare in E, compared to WSO2’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

webMethods.io

Read 94 webMethods.io reviews

8,835 Views
1,502 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

1,834 Views
697 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and webMethods.io compete in the integration platform market. While WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and supportive customer service, webMethods.io stands out with a superior feature set despite its higher pricing.

Features: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator includes strong security features and extensive integration capabilities. In comparison, webMethods.io delivers cloud integration and a user-friendly experience. Its innovative microservices architecture gives webMethods.io an edge.

Room for Improvement: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator could enhance its cloud deployment capabilities and flexibility. Also, its analytics and monitoring features could be improved. On the other hand, webMethods.io might benefit from more competitive pricing options and simplification in complex configurations. Additionally, the learning curve for some advanced features could be eased with more comprehensive user documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator offers straightforward on-premises deployment and responsive support. webMethods.io, however, excels in cloud-based deployment efficiency and service, particularly in complex configurations, outperforming WSO2 in cloud environments.

Pricing and ROI: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator attracts with competitive pricing and favorable ROI, providing cost-effective solutions. Although webMethods.io has a higher initial setup cost, its advanced capabilities provide significant ROI, promising better long-term results for companies investing in its feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

webMethods.io

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (8th), API Management (10th), Cloud Data Integration (6th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (32nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of webMethods.io is 10.5%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 5.7%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	10.5%
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator	5.7%
Other	83.8%

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers strong integration capabilities and reliable features but needs pricing and scaling improvements

Many things are evolving with the AI buzz in the market. What I would like to see improved or enhanced in webMethods.io in the future is that since webMethods.io is already under IBM, I think IBM will introduce and integrate AI into it. Additionally, regarding what webMethods.io can improve is the license cost. Other cloud players are also providing the same kind of functionality, such as AWS and Azure. webMethods.io is being installed on-premises, but AWS is providing it directly in the cloud. When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that. There are many competitors in the market for this.

Read full review

Andrea Cuccarini

Technical director at Cremete

Effective data transformation and integration in complex environments with high functionality

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your hand on this environment is a very demanding task. This is the real problem. The problem is not about the product, but about the complexity to manage, to configure, to decide what to do. I have some experience using SAP R/3. It seems to me something similar. When you have to configure a situation with a client, especially for a client not in an industrial sector, but in a service sector, it is quite usual that you are in trouble for some reason. This is always the story that I found in the implementations I have done. Maybe there are only three or four big problems, in some other cases there are more than that, but this is the situation usually. For WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, not the same, but I must say it is quite often there is a need to put together some pieces and make it work in a coordinated way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution has given us a competitive advantage because we have better automation and insight."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution for me has been the configuration-based UI. Once you get the hang of it, it enables you to easily develop an API. In addition, it has many in-built policies that are quite handy."

"The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation."

"I like the tool's scalability."

"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."

"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."

"The tool supports gRPC."

More webMethods.io pros

"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."

"From the capabilities and functional possibility and anything else technical, it is a very well-done product, I have to say."

"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."

"The connectors have been the most impactful features for handling integrations. I can use these connectors when I need specific connectivity with a third party, like a core banking system in BFSI. I don't need to do all the development. I take the specific connector, put in the IP address and password, and it takes care of everything."

"The installation process is easy."

"The solution's customer service is good."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."

"The patching of infrastructure is not very smooth and improved authentication should be added in the next feature."

"It is quite expensive."

"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."

"Prices should be reduced, ideally by up to 30% for long-term customers like us."

"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."

More webMethods.io cons

"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."

"You cannot include the validation of XPath."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"They should release upgrades more frequently."

"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."

"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."

"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."

"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"webMethods Integration Server is expensive, and there's no fixed price on it because it has a point pricing model. You can negotiate, which makes it interesting."

"The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing."

"Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under."

"There are no hidden costs in addition to the standard licensing fees for webMethods. For corporate organizations, it's a very cheap or fairly priced product, but for growing or small businesses, it's quite expensive. These businesses would probably need to consider an enterprise services bus at some point. Thus, from a pricing point, it closes out non-cooperate businesses."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"It is a low-cost solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	64

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

Spring Cloud Data Flow vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 5% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

December 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

December 2025

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Also Known As

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

No data available

Overview

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

West

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Free Report: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.