No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle GlassFish vs Oracle WebLogic Server comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle GlassFish
Ranking in Application Server
14th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle WebLogic Server
Ranking in Application Server
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of Oracle GlassFish is 3.7%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle WebLogic Server is 9.8%, down from 18.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Server Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle WebLogic Server9.8%
Oracle GlassFish3.7%
Other86.5%
Application Server
 

Featured Reviews

it_user517413 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead Developer
Offers EE Support. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.
The products offers EE support. It offers ease of use. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.
Thomas Waltair - PeerSpot reviewer
Regional Head And Director Product Development at Neptune Software Group
Stable and scalable enterprise deployment with Cloud-Native support
Oracle WebLogic Server helps with my deployment strategy in both monolithic as well as Cloud-Native ways. I think it is useful; this Cloud-Native support helps with deployment in both on-prem and cloud. For container deployment, we are not very rich. We are in the process of moving our business logic to containerization. But in terms of this being a big product, a core banking system, I prefer on-prem rather than cloud. The use cases and the scrum help me a lot in an iterative, incremental manner. I would recommend this product; it is an enterprise, large volume, and of course, it is worth it to deploy. I am providing this review with a rating of 9.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The products offers EE support."
"What I find most valuable in Oracle WebLogic Server is its flexibility in administering and managing applications, along with the built-in dashboards that offer high visibility into vulnerabilities."
"We can manage every application by creating a managed server and a cluster."
"I recommend the product because the installation is easy, it provides a secure environment, and it's easy to manage. The solution provides easy monitoring. Accessing all the logs is easy, and deploying application versions is smooth."
"The tool's technical support is very good."
"Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand."
"I am satisfied with this solution, as well as WebSphere."
"There are many valuable features in Oracle WebLogic Server, for sure, production redeployment is one of the best in order to deploy the new version of your application without removing the old one."
"The solution works well in load balancing."
 

Cons

"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."
"Managing and monitoring the WebLogic server environment has been challenging because most monitoring tools don't support it."
"If you want to use Oracle products to the fullest with enhanced customizations, you need to get trained. There is enough documentation and the flexibility to configure the application to your needs but you will need to spend more time gathering the knowledge."
"Stability was an issue in earlier versions, it was sometimes difficult to bring up the server whenever it goes down, which seldom happens."
"The administration is hard, and it is more complex to use than others."
"We're now using a binary WebLogic server without coherence so the in-memory replication we are operating, sometimes fail."
"Licensing fees need improvement."
"The cost could always be lower."
"I've had issues with some of the tracking features tracking and have had to go back to several generations of code to fix problems where things were touched."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"In our country, this is an expensive product."
"My company uses a licensed version of the product, so we get Oracle's support."
"The tool's pricing is yearly."
"Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server is expensive."
"It is expensive."
"The solution’s pricing is affordable."
"Its high expense is a significant drawback"
"The licensing fees are annual and depend on the model."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise17
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Oracle WebLogic Server?
I am not sure at this stage about any areas for improvement.
What is your primary use case for Oracle WebLogic Server?
The main purposes for which I use Oracle WebLogic Server is for enterprise deployment. It is an enterprise application deployment. I work with Cloud-Native support in Oracle WebLogic Server. We are...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle WebLogic Server?
The full license is costly. We are working with an embedded license; for us, it is acceptable, but in reality, the open full license will be costly because it is a number-of-core-based licensing. T...
 

Also Known As

GlassFish
WebLogic Application Server
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TravelMuse, Clarity Accounting
Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Center for Railway Information Systems, SPAR Austria Group, Reliance Commercial Finance, Industrial Bank of Korea, Al Jaber Group, Safe Water Kenya, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Apache, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: September 2026.
914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.