"It is really good in terms of features, and it is stable."
"Fusion Middleware's main feature for me is that it is quite flexible, and, as middleware, it provides us with all sorts of technology and application adapters, which makes it very handy to use."
"The scalability is good."
"Oracle Fusion is stable."
"In WebLogic, the most useful feature is the UI administration console from where we can configure everything, such as security access, and we can start and stop it graphically. That's the best feature of WebLogic Server."
"Oracle WebLogic Server is secure."
"It has good integration with security features, including OWASP."
"The technical support is responsive. They are always ready to help by various communication channels, such as Zoom calls. However, sometimes it will take a while because when we are dealing with a problem, they need to look at the logs and configuration. A lot of the issues are related to the configuration that they need to look at thoroughly before they can give us a solution and it can take a few days depending on the type of problem."
"WebLogic is reliable, and it's easy to use for development."
"We have some hosted servers as well as some of our own. It performs well."
"It's a scalable product."
"The product is flexible and allows us to leverage deployments."
"The price could always be better."
"Its price can be improved. We are currently looking for more cost-efficiency. It should also have a little bit more flexibility for customizations. The customizations should be quicker."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector."
"An improvement for Oracle's Fusion Middleware could definitely be found in the SOA component. It's a heavyweight container and, if you ask me, if a product is available as a docker image where we can easily port it in to another Kubernetes platform, that would be perfect. But as for the current situation in the market, nobody is really willing to deploy this on premises."
"The administration is hard, and it is more complex to use than others."
"Licensing fees need improvement."
"Its pricing should be better. We are analyzing other options, such as JBoss, because of the cost of WebLogic."
"In the future, I would like to see better support for the REST interface."
"The quarterly updates can sometimes lead to instability depending on the configuration of systems."
"The cost could always be lower."
"There are always ways to improve. But it's getting better every time, with every new release, and every new patch, it's getting better."
"In terms of what could be improved, maybe something related to the processes automation or starting and stopping the processes, because often WebLogic comes with something called Node Manager. Node Manager needs to be configured and administrated manually."
Oracle Fusion Middleware is ranked 6th in Application Server with 4 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 12 reviews. Oracle Fusion Middleware is rated 8.0, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Middleware writes "Highly flexible and solves all our problems in one product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Flexibility and versatility make this product valuable while quarterly updates may impact stability". Oracle Fusion Middleware is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, JBoss, IIS and Tomcat, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS and Oracle Application Server. See our Oracle Fusion Middleware vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
