We performed a comparison between Opsview and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It's a good solution. It covers all aspects of monitoring purposes."
"The most valuable feature of Opsview is the ability to clone the services when you're monitoring something out of the test setup."
"I am satisfied with the overall product since it works well…It is a stable solution."
"We use this solution for internal monitoring our own cloud platform because we are a public cloud provider. We also use it for monitoring purposes on behalf of our clients."
"What was very compelling about OpsView was that we could dial out the noise and have meaningful and actionable alerts."
"Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable."
"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."
"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."
"Key features for us are custom reporting, 95th Percentile, and trend lines."
"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick."
"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"In a future release, we would like to have Observ for AI. Any AI and intelligence it can add to the monitoring is obviously beneficial. We would also like to have automated callouts."
"Pricing and a few certain aspects in the solution needs to be improved."
"Customized reporting can be improved."
"Some of the graphics on Opsview could be improved."
"Maybe the graphical representation can be improved. It can be enhanced for better visualization. It could be a little better. And the graph center can be improved."
"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."
"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."
"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."
"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."
"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."
"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."
Opsview is ranked 32nd in Network Monitoring Software with 24 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. Opsview is rated 8.6, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Opsview writes "Responsive and easy to customize alerts for, while being priced similarly to its competition". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". Opsview is most compared with OP5 Monitor, Zabbix, Nagios XI, Instana Infrastructure Monitoring and SCOM, whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.