Opsview vs Statseeker comparison

Why PeerSpot?

ITRS and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ITRS is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.0, while Techniche is ranked #75. ITRS holds a 1.0% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Opsview

Read 25 Opsview reviews

6,585 Views
4,478 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

3,323 Views
3,223 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Opsview

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Opsview and Statseeker are competing products in the network monitoring arena. Based on data comparisons, Opsview appears more favorable in pricing and customer support, while Statseeker's features, notably its real-time data collection and high-speed performance, make it a compelling choice due to its balance between cost and capabilities.

Features: Opsview provides robust capabilities such as comprehensive monitoring, flexible alerting systems, and adaptability for various network environments. Statseeker offers real-time data collection, lightning-fast data processing, and high-speed performance to deliver immediate insights.

Room for Improvement: Opsview could improve in areas such as reducing initial setup cost, enhancing integration with third-party tools, and refining the user interface for better user experience. Statseeker might benefit from improved customer support, more extensive documentation for users, and enhancements in user-friendly deployment options to minimize the requirement for technical expertise.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Opsview offers a streamlined deployment process with substantial guidance and customer support, making it accessible to users. Statseeker emphasizes a rapid deployment model but may require more technical knowledge to optimize its utility fully, highlighting its speed-oriented setup as a core strength.

Pricing and ROI: Opsview typically has a higher initial setup cost but offers significant ROI through its versatile features and support services. Statseeker presents a lower setup cost, appealing to those seeking high-efficiency performance, which may lead to a quicker ROI in specific technical environments, emphasizing a cost-effective start with performance gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Opsview vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Opsview vs. Statseeker

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Opsview

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

41st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (19th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (36th), Cloud Monitoring Software (24th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

75th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Opsview is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Opsview	1.0%
Statseeker	0.5%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer1898607

Partner Technical Support & Escalation Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Real-time dashboards have improved our deployment monitoring and incident response

We are using Opsview ourselves, rather than being a consultant or a reseller. We do not use its auto-discovery feature. We do not utilize its API driven architecture. I do not know what metrics we use to assess the effectiveness of Opsview's hybrid IT monitoring. Overall, I am pretty satisfied with Opsview as it is good for what it does. I do not know if Grafana has any other advantages besides better stats, as I am not involved in that side. Based on my experience, I would still recommend Opsview to others as it is good for what it does. I gave this review a rating of 8.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like its scalability thanks to slaves, as you can add as many as you want, which also allows you to reach and monitor devices running on the network that are not accessible by the master."

"The dashboards are the real value add for this product in my opinion and enhance customer experience if done properly."

"We now have a single view for all systems monitored within our IT estate, while we previously had three different systems (each configured differently)."

"Opsview provides all the functionality of NetSaint and Nagios but with the simplicity of a GUI front end, using MySQL to centralize configuration."

"Very easy-to-use interface, especially starting from v5 onwards Advanced tweaking possibilities Netflow"

"There are several valuable features for us, including ease of configuration of monitoring of new hosts/services, worker redundancy and load balancing, and the fact that it’s compatible with the plethora of existing Nagios plugins available on the web."

"With the monitoring capabilities, I can tell when things happen and be proactive about them instead of constantly putting out fires."

"It's a good solution. It covers all aspects of monitoring purposes."

More Opsview pros

"The product has improved our organization by simplifying monitoring and giving real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise."

"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."

"It helps us track the status of over 1200 devices in multiple geographical locations."

"The solution reduces the complexity of our network monitoring because it can make my engineers do their jobs faster. The solution also reduces troubleshooting time for network administrators to pinpoint issues quicker."

"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."

"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."

"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."

"I like this product and would recommend it to a colleague at another company."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"Reload time: Although there have been major gains in the time to process reloads, I think that there is still room for improvement in this area."

"There is always room for improvement, and part of the reason we're looking at Grafana is because there are things it can do that Opsview cannot do as well."

"Customized reporting can be improved."

"Hard to say, some minor changes could help improve ease of configuring (which have already been requested and are now on the roadmap)."

"Pricing and a few certain aspects in the solution needs to be improved."

"We are starting to hit the limits of how we can scale out."

"SNMP traps management to be improved."

"In Opsview 4.6.3, there is no provision for making bulk changes to monitored servers via the GUI, though it is possible to custom-script bulk changes via the API."

More Opsview cons

"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."

"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."

"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."

"I don't know that the solution has had much of an impact on the complexity of our network monitoring."

"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."

"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."

"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."

"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not cheap. I think that the pricing is a little bit on the high side."

"The solution is priced similarly to other tools offering similar features."

"I would rate pricing a seven out of ten, where ten is the highest price."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Construction Company

15%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

17%

Construction Company

14%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Opsview Monitor?

There is always room for improvement, and part of the reason we're looking at Grafana is because there are things it can do that Opsview cannot do as well. Grafana does have features that I think m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opsview Monitor?

Our primary use case is monitoring our deployments.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Opsview Monitor?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Opsview

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

More Opsview Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 15% of the time

Nagios XI vs Statseeker

Compared 9% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 6% of the time

DX Spectrum vs Statseeker

Compared 5% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 5% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Opsview

September 2026

Download Opsview product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

September 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

Opsview Monitor, Opsview Enterprise

No data available

Overview

Opsview provides advanced monitoring for system availability, service metrics, and resource usage with flexibility and scalability tailored for global networks.

Opsview delivers comprehensive monitoring through its flexible alert framework, web GUI, and integration with Nagios plugins. It facilitates seamless server additions, supports multi-tenancy, and offers scalability with a MySQL backend. Configuring new hosts and services is straightforward, while advanced services like cloning and alert noise reduction enhance user experience. Users mention room for improvement in the API, database support, and features like bulk changes in the GUI. Despite these aspects, Opsview is preferred for cloud and client monitoring across multiple geographical points.

What are Opsview's most important features?

Flexible Alert Framework: Allows customized alerting rules to suit diverse needs.
Web GUI and Dashboard: Intuitive interfaces for real-time monitoring and data visualization.
Integration with Nagios: Compatible with a wide range of plugins for extended functionality.
Multi-Tenancy: Supports multiple users with isolated data views.
API and Automation: Streamlines management and operational workflows.
Distributed Monitoring: Ensures reliable performance across global networks.

What benefits or ROI are users experiencing?

Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure with ease.
Ease of Configuration: Simplifying initial setup and ongoing adjustments.
Accurate Alerting: Reduces false positives, improving response efficiency.
System Stability: Consistent performance with minimal downtime.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive integration and customization options.

Opsview proves valuable in cloud environments for monitoring resource availability and performance. Organizations deploy it for both internal and client-facing monitoring across global regions, benefiting from enhanced event triggers and automation opportunities, particularly in deployment monitoring and service tracking.

ITRS

Statseeker provides comprehensive network monitoring with features such as interface statistics, bandwidth utilization, and robust alerts for outages and temperature issues.

Statseeker offers extensive network visibility, including Traffic Analyzer, historical data access, and a user-friendly dashboard. Its fast data retrieval and detailed reports improve internal communication and monitoring. The platform's scalability, reliability, and low maintenance make it an efficient choice for network monitoring. Areas for improvement include interface design, NetFlow features, and integration with systems like Dynatrace and Cisco ONS. Reporting could be more intuitive, and enhancements in alerting options, documentation, and configuration management are needed.

What are the key features of Statseeker?

Interface Statistics: Provides detailed data on network interfaces and bandwidth utilization.
Traffic Analyzer: Offers precise traffic analysis tools for better network management.
Historical Data Access: Allows users to retrieve past network performance metrics quickly.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Simplifies navigation and access to critical information.
Scalability: Supports network growth without significant changes to existing setup.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Facilitates in-depth understanding of network performance.
Reliable Alerts: Ensures timely identification of issues with responsive ping alerts.
Ease of Maintenance: Reduces the resources required for ongoing management.
Improved Communication: Utilizes reports for effective internal communication.
Data-Driven Decision Making: Empowers users with real-time and historical statistics.

In industries, Statseeker is implemented for tasks like monitoring up/down status, capacity management, and traffic analysis. Users leverage it to generate reports, manage congestion, and track device performance across network layers. Its ability to provide real-time statistics supports evidence-based decisions for upgrades and improves insight into network availability and device utilization.

Techniche

Sample Customers

IBM, BT, Cisco, Sky, UPS, Capgemini, Visolit, Fujitsu Services UK, UKCloud, Massachusetts Insitute of Technology, Cornell University, Incomm

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Opsview vs. Statseeker

September 2026

Free Report: Opsview vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Opsview vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Opsview vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.