It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools.
Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.
It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools.
Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.
Free
This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.
Free
This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.
Costly, but it is the top product in SaaS/PaaS. Pricing is more for large to enterprise level companies.
Pricing and license differ and depend on how much license you are purchasing from them.
Costly, but it is the top product in SaaS/PaaS. Pricing is more for large to enterprise level companies.
Pricing and license differ and depend on how much license you are purchasing from them.
It's an expensive solution.
It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly.
It's an expensive solution.
It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly.
There is no cost for setup or licensing.
This product is freeware, so there is no charge for using it.
There is no cost for setup or licensing.
This product is freeware, so there is no charge for using it.
The product is becoming more and more expensive.
My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.
The product is becoming more and more expensive.
My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.
This solution costs less than competing products.
The price is fine.
This solution costs less than competing products.
The price is fine.
The cost depends greatly on the needs of the testing engagement.
I would still consider LoadRunner as an expensive tool and you get a LoadRunner and the Performance Center.
The cost depends greatly on the needs of the testing engagement.
I would still consider LoadRunner as an expensive tool and you get a LoadRunner and the Performance Center.
We have an enterprise account; it has worked great for our needs.
Try the free trial and work with a Sauce Labs representative to see what package works best for your application(s).
We have an enterprise account; it has worked great for our needs.
Try the free trial and work with a Sauce Labs representative to see what package works best for your application(s).
The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing.
Licence cost is very attractive compared to other vendor tools and also there are many license alternatives.
The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing.
Licence cost is very attractive compared to other vendor tools and also there are many license alternatives.
End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses.
It probably has a yearly license.
End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses.
It probably has a yearly license.
The tool is not really good at all because you need to purchase some additional tools.
We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance.
The tool is not really good at all because you need to purchase some additional tools.
We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance.
The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan.
The solution is free and open source.
The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan.
The solution is free and open source.
This is an open source solution so it does not cost anything for licensing or otherwise.
Appian is open-source, which is not licensed.
This is an open source solution so it does not cost anything for licensing or otherwise.
Appian is open-source, which is not licensed.
There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.
We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).
There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage.
We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD).
LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month.
This is an affordable product.
LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month.
This is an affordable product.
It does everything you could hope for in a performance testing solution. It's not cheap.
It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools.
It does everything you could hope for in a performance testing solution. It's not cheap.
It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools.
The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward.
There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use.
The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward.
There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use.
The solution is free.
The solution is free.
It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months.
The pricing is quite high compared to the competition.
It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months.
The pricing is quite high compared to the competition.
The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year.
The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year.
The solution is not expensive.
The solution is not expensive.
We got a deal on it for the first year. We're paying $8,000.
The product is not cheap.
We got a deal on it for the first year. We're paying $8,000.
The product is not cheap.
The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle.
The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle.
OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten.
The product could be more affordable.
OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten.
The product could be more affordable.
It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions.
We have a yearly license for 16 devices.
It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions.
We have a yearly license for 16 devices.
We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support.
We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support.
The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good.
It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis.
The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good.
It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis.
