OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs Snyk comparison

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Read 48 Snyk reviews

20,249 Views
202 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 4, 2025

OpenText Cloud Service Automation competes in cloud management, while Snyk focuses on application security. Snyk stands out for its advanced security features, preferred by those who prioritize comprehensive security capabilities.

Features: OpenText Cloud Service Automation is notable for automation and integration abilities, managing hybrid and multi-cloud environments effectively. It offers life cycle management and support for multiple providers. Snyk excels in security vulnerability detection, integration with developer tools, and a comprehensive vulnerability database. It provides real-time notifications and helps developers quickly identify and fix vulnerabilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its multi-cloud management features and simplified integrations. It might also benefit from clearer user documentation and expanded support for non-HPE products. Snyk could improve by expanding its library and enhancing its patching tools for easier use in diverse environments. More robust reporting features and reduced false positives would also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers a streamlined deployment process and extensive support resources. It provides direct support channels, easing transitions in complex environments. Snyk benefits from scalability and developer-focused integrations, although it focuses more on security integration than streamlined deployment. Its support is generally well-received but could be enhanced for broader usability.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Cloud Service Automation features competitive pricing and moderate setup costs, aiming for significant long-term savings. Snyk's higher cost is justified by the promise of ROI through enhanced security, preventing costly breaches. Its investment is ideal for those prioritizing security, while OpenText presents a cost-effective solution for cloud service management.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Snyk Report (Updated: July 2025).

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Snyk

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Ranking in Cloud Management

36th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Ranking in Cloud Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), Container Security (6th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Cloud Service Automation is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

SunpritSingh

Test Lead at MindTree

A user friendly solution that makes it easy to submit and view jobs

The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user-friendly the solution is. Traditionally, when we use a mainframe system to submit jobs, we have to see the spool or any error we might get in the spool. It is very command-based and uses a green screen, which is not user-friendly. Micro Focus enterprise makes it easy to submit and view jobs. We just have to log into the particular portal, go to the catalog and view any files we want. The same can be said about submitting jobs. We know what JCL we want to submit, give it the path, and then submit it with no command required. It is very user-friendly.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles

The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

"The code scans on the source code itself were valuable."

"Snyk has given us really good results because it is fully automated. We don't have to scan projects every time to find vulnerabilities, as it already stores the dependencies that we are using. It monitors 24/7 to find out if there are any issues that have been reported out on the Internet."

"The valuable aspect is its security capabilities."

"It has an accurate database of vulnerabilities with a low amount of false positives."

"A main feature of Snyk is that when you go with SCA, you do get properly done security composition, also from the licensing and open-source parameters perspective. A lot of companies often use open-source libraries or frameworks in their code, which is a big security concern. Snyk deals with all the things and provides you with a proper report about whether any open-source code or framework that you are using is vulnerable. In that way, Snyk is very good as compared to other tools."

"The CLI feature is quite useful because it gives us a lot of flexibility in what we want to do. If you use the UI, all the information is there and you can see what Snyk is showing you, but there is nothing else that you can change. However, when you use the CLI, then you can use commands and can get the output or response back from Snyk. You can also take advantage of that output in a different way. For the same reason, we have been using the CLI for the hard gate in the pipeline: Obtain a particular CDSS score for vulnerability. Based on that information, we can then decide if we want to block or allow the build. We have more flexibility if we use the CLI."

"It has a nice dashboard where I can see all the vulnerabilities and risks that they provided. I can also see the category of any risk, such as medium, high, and low. They provide the input priority-wise. The team can target the highest one first, and then they can go to medium and low ones."

"Snyk categorizes the level of vulnerability into high, medium, and low, which helps organizations prioritize which issues to tackle first."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."

"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

"We had some issues integrating into our pipeline, however, they were resolved."

"Could include other types of security scanning and statistical analysis"

"Snyk has several limitations, including issues with Gradle, NPM, and Xcode, and trouble with AutoPR."

"We would like to have upfront knowledge on how easy it should be to just pull in an upgraded dependency, e.g., even introduce full automation for dependencies supposed to have no impact on the business side of things. Therefore, we would like some output when you get the report with the dependencies. We want to get additional information on the expected impact of the business code that is using the dependency with the newer version. This probably won't be easy to add, but it would be helpful."

"A feature we would like to see is the ability to archive and store historical data, without actually deleting it. It's a problem because it throws my numbers off. When I'm looking at the dashboard's current vulnerabilities, it's not accurate."

"Scalability has some issues because we have a lot of code and its use is mandatory. Therefore, it can be slow at times, especially because there are a lot of projects and reporting. Some UI improvements could help with this."

"Generating reports and visibility through reports are definitely things they can do better."

"We have seen cases where tools didn't find or recognize certain dependencies. These are known issues, to some extent, due to the complexity in the language or stack that you using. There are some certain circumstances where the tool isn't actually finding what it's supposed to be finding, then it could be misleading."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."

"Snyk is a premium-priced product, so it's kind of expensive. The big con that I find frustrating is when a company charges extra for single sign-on (SSO) into their SaaS app. Snyk is one of the few that I'm willing to pay that add-on charge, but generally I disqualify products that charge an extra fee to do integrated authentication to our identity provider, like Okta or some other SSO. That is a big negative. We had to pay extra for that. That little annoyance aside, it is expensive. You get a lot out of it, but you're paying for that premium."

"Pricing-wise, it is not expensive as compared to other tools. If you have a couple of licenses, you can scan a certain number of projects. It just needs to be attached to them."

"The pricing is acceptable, especially for enterprises. I don't think it's too much of a concern for our customers. Something like $99 per user is reasonable when the stakes are high."

"Cost-wise, it's similar to Veracode, but I don't know the exact cost."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"It's good value. That's the primary thing. It's not cheap-cheap, but it's good value."

"You can get a good deal with Snyk for pricing. It's a little expensive, but it is worth it."

"I would rate the pricing of Snyk at two. I'm currently using the free version, which the company offers before buying the full version. So, the price is affordable, especially for an enterprise."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support.

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

We have large customers for OpenText Cloud Service Automation. I rate it a nine out of ten.

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Comparisons

Compared 36% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 33% of the time

Morpheus vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 31% of the time

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Competitors

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 11% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 7% of the time

Black Duck vs Snyk

Compared 5% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Cloud Service Automation

August 2025

OpenText Cloud Service Automation report

Download OpenText Cloud Service Automation product report

Download Snyk product report

July 2025

Also Known As

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation

Fugue

Overview

OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

OpenText

Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.

Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.

What are the key features of Snyk?

Easy Integration: Snyk integrates with CI/CD pipelines, GitHub, and JIRA for seamless security management.
Multilingual Support: It offers extensive programming language support, enhancing project compatibility.
Actionable Insights: Provides accurate vulnerability detection with actionable remediation guidance.
Cloud and Container Security: Offers comprehensive checks for cloud and container environments, improving security posture.
Automation & Notifications: Automates vulnerability alerts and notifications for early threat identification in development.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Speeds up development by identifying and fixing vulnerabilities early in the software lifecycle.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes security risks with extensive vulnerability scanning and proactive alerting.
Productivity Boost: Enhances productivity by integrating security directly into developers' workflows.
Improved Compliance: Aids in maintaining license compliance and managing open-source dependencies effectively.

Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Osiatis

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief