SonarQube and Snyk are prominent in the software development tools category, focusing respectively on code quality and security vulnerabilities. SonarQube has the edge in comprehensive code analysis, while Snyk is superior in identifying and managing security vulnerabilities.
Features: SonarQube offers extensive language support, custom quality profiles, and valuable plugins like 3D Code Metrics, crucial for large companies. It integrates well with various CI tools and is open-source. Snyk monitors dependencies for vulnerabilities, integrates seamlessly into CI/CD systems, and alerts users instantly about security issues. It provides comprehensive security scanning and supports a wide range of integrations.
Room for Improvement: SonarQube could enhance security features, ease of use, and address documentation and integration challenges. Load balancing and configuration complexities also need improvement. Snyk could expand support for additional languages, improve static code analysis tool integration, and enhance documentation and API responsiveness. Its security analysis features could be more comprehensive.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube boasts strong community support, extensive documentation, and both on-premises and hybrid deployment options, although paid support requires specific licenses. Snyk focuses on flexible cloud deployment and offers robust API integrations. Its customer service is responsive, but handling multiple integrations can be complex.
Pricing and ROI: SonarQube's community edition provides excellent value, though enterprise features can be costly. Its pricing is justified by its comprehensive code quality capabilities. Snyk, though expensive, offers strong security features with flexible per-user licenses, beneficial for enterprises looking for cost-effective risk reduction. Both solutions offer significant ROI by enhancing security and code quality.
I have seen a return on the investment from SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) because the value it adds relates to static code analysis and vulnerability assessments needed for our FDA approval process.
We see productivity increasing based on the fact that the code review is mostly automated, allowing the developer to fix the code themselves before assigning it to someone else to review, thus receiving that ROI.
It's more about maintaining standards and being able to prevent issues before they occur.
Their response time aligns with their SLA commitments.
Our long-standing association has ensured smooth communication, resulting in favorable support experiences and satisfactory issue resolution.
The community support is quite effective.
I would rate the technical support for SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as a 10 because we have not faced any specific issues that required us to contact tech support, which is a very rare case.
They showed us where we can actually get those granular level reporting extracted for Excel, which was a quick guide.
Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories.
I find SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) very scalable because we're able to create a new repository and integrate all the tools on that project and it just works.
I would rate the scalability of SonarQube Server as a 10 because we can configure the server to scan multiple projects based on the number of lines.
I think SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is stable, and we did not face any problems unless there was a power outage or if the LAN cable was plugged out.
Both Veracode and Snyk should implement this new scoring system for CVSS and AIVSS.
It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for that functionality.
The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial.
If I fix some vulnerabilities today, they reappear in the next scan, and there will be completely different issues that need to be fixed.
Instead of grouping, I would prefer to scan the code as part of development and then generate a report on a daily basis among different units or projects, which is currently complicated.
As soon as I see that they've got a new feature that integrates AI that is not as generative as other GenAI platforms that actually generate the code and help developers develop faster, I believe that capability is lacking.
After negotiations, we received a special package with a good price point.
Snyk is recognized as the cheapest option we have evaluated.
They always offer around a two-year contract, but we always take a one-year contract because it's expensive.
I would rate the pricing for SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as an 8, where 1 is very cheap and 10 is very expensive, because Coverity is very expensive, and while SonarQube is not cheap, it is still less expensive than Coverity.
The freemium version of SonarQube Server offers excellent value, especially compared to the high costs of Snyk.
Our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
Snyk helps detect vulnerabilities before code moves to production, allowing for integration with DevOps and providing a shift-left advantage by identifying and fixing bugs before deployment.
The best feature of Snyk is the integration with our ticketing system, which is Jira.
The most valuable features in SonarQube Server are static code analysis, code review, and unit test coverage, with heavy usage of all three.
Some of the static code analysis capabilities are the most beneficial.
We use SonarQube Server's centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) | 20.8% |
| Snyk | 6.5% |
| Other | 72.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 75 |
Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.
Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.
What are the key features of Snyk?Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.
SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.
SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.
What are the key features of SonarQube Server?Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
