OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #44 with an average rating of 7.5, while Broadcom is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.8. OpenText holds a 0.6% mindshare in APM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Process M...

Read 6 OpenText Business Process Monitoring reviews

1,841 Views
1,804 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Read 14 VMware Aria Operations for Applications reviews

7,303 Views
4,017 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Process M...

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Both OpenText Business Process Monitoring and VMware Aria Operations for Applications compete in the business process monitoring and application operations space. Users generally indicate that VMware Aria Operations for Applications has the upper hand due to its advanced features and robust integration capabilities.

What features are offered by OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to VMware Aria Operations for Applications?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring offers extensive monitoring capabilities, integration with other OpenText products, and a comprehensive ecosystem. VMware Aria Operations for Applications provides advanced analytics, detailed performance metrics, and seamless integration with VMware environments. If analytics and VMware integration are critical, VMware Aria Operations for Applications has the upper hand.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to VMware Aria Operations for Applications?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring can improve user customization, more intuitive alert systems, and overall scalability. VMware Aria Operations for Applications needs better user training, improved documentation, and enhanced support for non-VMware environments.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to VMware Aria Operations for Applications?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is straightforward to deploy and offers strong customer support. VMware Aria Operations for Applications has a more complex deployment process but provides detailed documentation and relatively responsive customer support. OpenText may be preferable for users prioritizing ease of deployment, while VMware offers more comprehensive service support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Business Process Monitoring in comparison to VMware Aria Operations for Applications?

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is appreciated for its competitive pricing and quick return on investment. VMware Aria Operations for Applications, while more expensive, offers extensive features and higher long-term ROI according to user reviews. OpenText is a strong contender for those focusing on cost efficiency, while VMware is ideal for those seeking advanced functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Process M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), Container Monitoring (6th), Cloud Monitoring Software (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Aria Operations for Applications is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Aria Operations for Applications	1.4%
OpenText Business Process Monitoring	0.6%
Other	98.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization

Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.

Read full review

Ajay Shukla

Consultant at HCLTech

Automation and insightful diagnostics elevate operations while improvements are welcome

The new version 8.18 has brought significant improvements. The main purpose of using this tool is having a single console to manage all entities. The cloud integration capabilities, including private, public, and hybrid, are already well-implemented. The ability to manage multiple vCenters across different geographical locations is very effective. The new Skyline health feature and certificate and licensing management are particularly useful improvements. The dashboard's overview tab provides comprehensive information about current vCenter status, resizable amounts, reclamation opportunities, anomalies, diagnostics, licensing, and certificates. However, there is room for improvement in application analysis. The current functionality lacks detailed monitoring at the kernel level, focusing mainly on CPU, memory, and storage matrices. Enhanced application monitoring capabilities, including tracking downtime for specific types of applications such as transactional or e-commerce applications, would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ability to monitor multiple application protocols."

"The solution is very good at showing users ways to use a user action on a website and to see the performance."

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

"The stability has been very good over the years."

"The tool team was sort of aware of those tools to deal with. And, that helped us to deliver the project on time."

"The main benefits of using OpenText Business Process Monitoring for my company include anomaly detection and proactive analysis, which enhance our monitoring capabilities."

"Product allows business analysts to create the application with very little software development time needed."

"What I find most valuable is that it has synthetic monitoring that you can run from different geographies and identify, as it’s more proactive monitoring than reactive monitoring, so it'll alert customers before they find out things are not working, and proactive monitoring is very helpful to most of our customers."

"Using Wavefront, we have been able to reduce the complexity of our pipeline."

"I find VMware Aria Operations for Applications to be very stable, and I would rate it a ten out of ten."

"Wavefront's monitoring tools and visibility into public cloud platforms are competing with the best out there."

"Wavefront gives us the complexity we need, instead of spending time coming up with a nice dashboard from some other means, or just creating and coding our own app."

"Scalability for VMware Aria Operations for Applications is easy to implement and manage."

"I gladly recommend VMware Aria Operations for Applications because it is cost effective and has commendable AI response capabilities."

"The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities."

"People are very pleased with the implementation."

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications pros

Cons

"Customer support is pretty average and can use some improvement."

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect."

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

"The product has been discontinued."

"Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations."

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

"It doesn't have SNMP, the standard communication protocol for sending alerts."

"Support has experienced high turnover recently due to HP acqusition of the former Mercury Interactive product."

"In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get."

"VMware technical support has declined since the Broadcom acquisition. Previously, they were more focused on issue resolution, but now they prioritize licensing verification before providing support."

"The solution could be expensive, which might be a limiting factor."

"So far, the solution's learning curve has been pretty high."

"The implementation is a long process that should be improved."

"The support from VMware is not very helpful. This is because you always receive many questions from the support service but few actual solutions."

"The return on investment is best suited for organizations that do not have the resources for a dedicated VM environment team. However, the cost of the product doesn't show significant benefits."

"They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us."

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a three-year license package, it was a good deal."

"Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."

"I would rate the pricing as three out of five."

"I don't have the details. In our case, there is a mixture in place. We have production usage, and we are also doing training for VMware. So, we also have a training instance. It is worth the money you would spend on it. That's because if you were to build all of this yourself by using some of the open source tools, then you would need a lot of time."

"The licensing costs are very high, particularly when you consider that we have to purchase a level 1 license for every integration, such as the load balancer, HAProxy, and the MSSP. And if you want to use vSAN, that's another license. Then, of course, Tanzu Observability has its own separate license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

The solution includes cost drivers that can be configured according to your environment. You can input server-wise, CPU-wise, storage, and memory costs per hour or day. Once cost drivers are provid...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

I have been involved in several projects where I had to implement automation and monitoring alerting. I performed automation using VMware Aria Operations for Applications. There is an automation ta...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 13% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 9% of the time

Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 7% of the time

IDERA Precise vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors

Datadog vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 4% of the time

LogicMonitor vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 4% of the time

Dynatrace vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2026

OpenText Business Process Monitoring report

Download OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Aria Operations for Applications

July 2026

VMware Aria Operations for Applications report

Download VMware Aria Operations for Applications product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor

Tanzu Observability, Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability

Overview

OpenText Business Process Monitoring provides advanced capabilities in anomaly detection, proactive analysis, and alerts, enhancing monitoring proficiency with an easy-to-use interface supporting multiple application protocols.

Supporting organizations in identifying potential issues, OpenText Business Process Monitoring delivers compelling functionality for monitoring applications through synthetic monitoring across geographies. Its strategic utility extends to asset management in large ERP systems, focusing on complex transactions, real user experience modeling, and change management. Easy implementation is bolstered by advantageous licensing deals and limited development time, helping business analysts create applications swiftly. Stability and scalability add significant value, although improvement is needed in support response times post-HP acquisition, protocol support challenges, and documentation clarity. Concerns revolve around real-time analytics, tool integration, and enhanced monitoring configurations.

What are key features?

Anomaly Detection: Identifies irregularities to prevent issues before they impact performance.
Proactive Analysis: Assesses potential risks for preemptive action.
Automatic Alerts: Provides instant notifications on critical developments.
Synthetic Monitoring: Enables proactive alerts and performance assessment from multiple geographies.
Multiple Protocol Monitoring: Offers versatility in overseeing diverse application ecosystems.

What benefits should be expected in reviews?

Quick ROI: Fast returns on investment through robust monitoring features.
Easy Interface: User-friendly design reducing complexity in navigation.
Enhanced Scalability: Adaptable monitoring capabilities supporting expanding infrastructures.
Minimal Development Time: Rapid application creation with familiar scripting tools.
Advantageous Licensing: Cost-effective options leveraging existing tools and technologies.

Organizations leverage OpenText Business Process Monitoring to maintain the performance of both public and internal applications, predicting and preparing for maintenance needs. It serves critical roles in strategic change, complex transaction monitoring, and ERP workflow development across various industries, ensuring consistency and effective management of change.

OpenText

VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is a powerful tool for monitoring and analyzing the performance and availability of applications and infrastructure in real-time.

With its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, visualizing and analyzing data becomes effortless. The real-time alerting system ensures timely issue resolution, while scalability and a user-friendly interface provide a seamless experience for smooth operations.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service

1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Databricks 4. DigitalOcean 5. Equinix 6. Fidelity Investments 7. Google 8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 9. Honeywell 10. IBM 11. Intel 12. JetBlue Airways 13. LinkedIn 14. Lyft 15. Mastercard 16. Microsoft 17. MongoDB 18. Netflix 19. Nvidia 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Pinterest 23. Qualcomm 24. Red Hat 25. Salesforce 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Square 29. TMobile 30. Twitter 31. Uber 32. VMware

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

August 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.