"The multi-factor authentication process and the geo-locking features are great."
"The two-factor login is great. I receive a message and just have to press okay."
"The push notifications and the integrations they offer are valuable. Their mobile app is very useful. It is very easy to use."
"It meets our security needs very well. It is easy to use, and documentation is also available. It is also very stable and scalable, and its support is also very good. We are satisfied with this solution."
"It is a good solution for hybrid environments and VPN."
"The solution so far has been very stable."
"The ease of deployment, ease of use, and speed of delivery is what I like about Okta Workforce Identity. It is very easy to use. For a lot of software, you need to be trained extensively and have a very technical background. Okta Workforce Identity is quite simple. You can integrate any software into Okta. They've got a network of 7,000 applications that easily integrate into it."
"Its integration components are most valuable. It integrates with everything in some way. There are some products, such as O365 or AD, with which it completely and 100% integrates. So, you can seamlessly create accounts across the board with some of these products. For some of the products with which it doesn't completely integrate, you can do some kind of interfacing."
"It is dependent on the evolution of your user base. It depends on usage per user, so the more sign-ins there are, the more expensive it becomes, so it works best for smaller companies from a financial perspective."
"A solution that's easy to use, stable, and reliable."
"The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password."
"It's reliable and it does what it is advertised to do."
"Its simplicity and its integration with various vendor-agnostic platforms are the most valuable features."
"The solution provides us with an easy way to configure and join the VPN with Perimeter 81."
"Their split tunneling feature has been very valuable to our company since implementing the Perimeter 81 solution."
"It helps to quickly get access to the pages I need."
"Its documentation must be in French because we are a French-speaking country. They should also provide more training documentation. Its management interface should also be improved. They should also improve its update period. If I compare its update period with other products such as Palo Alto firewalls, this solution is really slow in updates."
"The dashboard needs to be improved."
"Certain customers can not use this product because it is cloud-based."
"We had some trouble with the password reset function."
"The only time I really had some negative feedback for them was about the UI of their mobile app, but they improved it in the last version. It is good on the functionality side, but their pricing model is a little bit weird. Currently, there is no price advantage in signing up for yearly contracts. If you are on a monthly term or a yearly contract, you basically pay the same price, and that is very unusual. Normally, there is a discount when someone signs up for the 12-month system."
"The solution should have greater on-premises availability, not just cloud and more package customization in its processing."
"It would be pricing, which is a tough one because it goes against Microsoft. A lot of companies say they're a Microsoft partner, and they get all their software for free. Okta is like a luxury product, and it's not the most affordable one. I would say if they could work on pricing, it would help. Other than that, they've done great strides in developing a product that is really good. The companies that do see the value tend to invest in it."
"The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved."
"Therefore, if you have 10 million users, that's almost 100 million, so it is costly."
"The initial setup can be complex at first."
"There are some issues with the interface that can be improved."
"The only aspect in which it can be improved is that the interface could be cleaner. I found this even when I was trying to do my certification exam because the certification is hands-on. You find yourself fumbling around a little bit to find simple things. This happens even when you start to get familiar with the product."
"The pricing could be improved."
"In order to have to bypass the login using the website, a good feature for Perimeter 81 to have is a login instance in the Perimeter 81 application. I'm using a Mac and we don't have that functionality."
"I would suggest adding more networking and security features that allow more customization within their platform."
"Currently, I am not able to define a different country or location, which can result in negative experiences as the tool is being recognized by websites and this can make it difficult to access them or force me to disable the program temporarily."
Earn 20 points
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 1st in ZTNA as a Service with 18 reviews while Perimeter 81 is ranked 9th in ZTNA as a Service with 3 reviews. Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4, while Perimeter 81 is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Stable and reliable solution but the application updates are lacking". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perimeter 81 writes "Helpful technical support with great single sign-on functionality and a seamless login experience". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Azure Active Directory, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Auth0 and Zscaler Private Access, whereas Perimeter 81 is most compared with Zscaler Private Access, Zscaler SASE, Cato Networks, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Axis Security. See our Okta Workforce Identity vs. Perimeter 81 report.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
