We performed a comparison between Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and ThreatMetrix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out in this report how the two Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"It's a very good case management system."
"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms."
"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."
"The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data."
"There is excellent documentation available."
"The solution is stable."
"One of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side."
"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."
"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."
"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex."
"The interface does look a bit outdated."
"We are only using one feature. We haven't found the other features to be very good or very powerful."
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 2nd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 4 reviews while ThreatMetrix is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 2 reviews. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 7.6, while ThreatMetrix is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Offers robotics, machine learning, and enables us to reduce analysts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatMetrix writes "Great technical support, good integration capabilities and offers good documentation". Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, SAS Fraud Management, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and IBM Trusteer, whereas ThreatMetrix is most compared with BioCatch, iovation FraudForce, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, IBM Trusteer and IBM Safer Payments. See our Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management vs. ThreatMetrix report.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.