New Relic vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

Why PeerSpot?

New Relic and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. New Relic is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.2. New Relic holds a 3.6% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of New Relic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

New Relic

Read 176 New Relic reviews

29,719 Views
19,317 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Read 29 OpenText SiteScope reviews

6,368 Views
5,986 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

New Relic

OpenText SiteScope

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and New Relic are two prominent monitoring solutions frequently compared by tech buyers. Analysis indicates that users appreciate OpenText SiteScope's robust infrastructure monitoring, but many favor New Relic's comprehensive feature set and user-friendly approach, leading to overall higher satisfaction.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText SiteScope offers real-time monitoring, extensive alerting capabilities, and robust infrastructure monitoring. New Relic is known for deep application performance monitoring, diverse integration options, and features that align well with modern cloud environments.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText SiteScope needs enhancements in scalability, improved documentation, and structural improvements. New Relic users seek better support response times, more cost-effective pricing tiers, and service enhancements.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText SiteScope's deployment is seen as straightforward but requires significant configuration. Customer service receives mixed reviews, with some users finding support less responsive. New Relic is praised for its simpler deployment process and broadly positive customer service, though some report delays in support responses.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText SiteScope is viewed as cost-effective for infrastructure monitoring, but some users feel the initial setup is complex. New Relic, despite higher costs, is often considered worth the investment for its advanced capabilities. Users generally perceive New Relic to deliver better ROI, offsetting its higher pricing with enhanced functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed New Relic vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. OpenText SiteScope

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

New Relic

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

176

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (10th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd), AIOps (6th)

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of New Relic is 3.6%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
New Relic	3.6%
OpenText SiteScope	1.3%
Other	95.1%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Real-time alerts have reduced server outage impact and support fast incident response

In the dashboard, if they could show a little more metrics regarding the application and related things, that would be how New Relic could be improved. Currently, there are things showing from the server level and application level, but it can be improved. That is what I felt. Regarding user interface, I do not feel much concern, but for some kind of issues when we are trying to get support from the New Relic team, their SLA seems to be long. They are taking seven to ten working days for resolving some kind of scenario or issue. That is a bit difficult for us. If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful. When it comes to the customer support part, I felt they need to be a little more improved on that part. The support overall is good, but they can improve. That is the reason I have given it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

Proactive monitoring has reduced response time and has improved capacity planning accuracy

Regarding areas for improvement, there may be minor issues, but I have not faced any significant issues with OpenText SiteScope because I have a team that uses this product daily. As a monitoring dashboard user, I do not have any negative feedback. A feature that could be added is direct integration with a ticketing tool, as it would help operation teams directly detect alarms and alerts happening in our infrastructure. Direct integration with a ticketing tool such as Remedy would be a good feature. OpenText SiteScope has some limitations, especially with integration between OpenText SiteScope and Remedy, which must be done through middle software. There are also limitations for cloud monitoring as well as for Docker and Kubernetes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"New Relic is the right solution in my opinion."

"<p>New Relic has positively impacted my organization by helping with our observability goals.</p>"

"Insights with key transactions and response time, to understand which calls take the longest and where the bottlenecks are."

"The most valuable feature is the New Relic APM module to deep-dive into the application, to get bottlenecks to the surface, and to improve application performance. Also, the New Relic Insights module creates a real-time dashboard on application performance to create awareness for the DevOps team."

"The alert mechanism is quite accurate when something goes wrong in your system. For example, if you have hundreds of APIs on your server, and any of the APIs is not performing well, you get an alert. When there is a drop or change in the threshold value, the beauty of New Relic is that within a fraction of seconds, all the stakeholders who are configured in the New Relic system will get an alert. That's one good thing."

"Server uptime is its most valuable feature."

"We like the performance of the product; it's very good, very reliable, and all features are capable of responding to our requirements."

"We’re able to see real-time sessions come through, talk directly to customers as they’re having issues with the site, and pull up their email addresses to see what issues they have, which makes it crucial for customer support and engineering."

More New Relic pros

"SiteScope has built-in flat file DB, hence it removes the dependency of an external DB for higher stability."

"Simplest tool for monitoring servers, web content, databases and other hardware. Its dashboard is really good."

"The tool has capabilities other than managing web-based applications, like URL Monitor and EPI Script. It is also easy to use the tool."

"The monitoring capabilities have no limit; whatever you can imagine, you can monitor, even using URL monitors, database query monitors, and formula composite monitors, which are not common in other tools."

"Infrastructure monitoring is the most valuable feature."

"The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product."

"It can monitor over a 100 technologies with built-in solution templates."

"Has a simple setup. It can be up and running within hours."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

Cons

"From a point of view of showing you what to do fine but in terms of showing you what to do with the data infuriatingly unhelpful."

"We would like to receive more AWS-specific details from the New Relic Dashboard, like EC2 health."

"It is complicated, especially in how you interpret the data that it provides. If it had a bit more canned, out-of-the-box features, especially some of the reporting features, that would be more useful."

"Last year, there were several New Relic outages where alerts were either fired in error or not fired at all."

"The product's initial setup phase is not straightforward to manage if you have no experience with installations, making it an area that can be improved."

"Joining datasets. Currently, it’s only possible to pull data from a single event type."

"I think their dev packages for server monitoring could handle configuration a bit better."

"They are a costly solution and the stability should be better for the price."

More New Relic cons

"The interface of OpenText SiteScope needs improvement. It has a Java-based interface, which is slow and could be simplified for better usability."

"Micro Focus SiteScope is a little slow to load when I go to load it up, and it's not as intuitive as some of the other programs, such as SolarWinds."

"You can use OpenText SiteScope for small or middle environments. But if you want to monitor a large environment, it is not scalable. If you can monitor a large environment with OpenText SiteScope, it can be a valuable product."

"Full application functionality available via the API. There are some functions you can perform managing monitors, that are only available through the UI."

"It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking."

"We'll probably remove SiteScope shortly because we've been using another monitoring tool in production. SiteScope is just not something we use very much of any more."

"It should improve its integrations with various tools, especially service management tools."

"The lack of an agent means that remote monitoring requires multiple firewall ports to be opened."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If I remember it correctly, the pricing was based on the core, and the monthly subscription used to cost us $1,500 or $2,000. We had pre-prod and production services. Costing was different for pre-prod and production. For pre-prod, it was 40% less than the production service cost. It was a combined package."

"This is an expensive product."

"New Relic is either free with low retention and minimal functionalities, or expensive with full options and retention."

"The price of the solution could be less expensive. You have to pay a lot for each user. There is an additional cost for extra features."

"There is a picture which goes to your browser and it monitors requests from other users. However, it's impossible to use now because the price is very high. The feature is very nice, but I tried it during the trial period, and the current price makes it impossible to use."

"The price depends on how many agents you want."

"The solution is cheap, but prices can go up when users grow."

"The solution is priced reasonably. New Relic APM is one of the best products for me because it's economical, so anyone can easily pick it over other solutions and use it."

More New Relic pricing and cost advice

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

"Licensing is a little steep."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	52
Large Enterprise	80

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

I find New Relic to be somewhat expensive. Our team shares logins, contrasting with other applications where individual team accounts are standard. Pricing is a primary concern since New Relic can ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for New Relic Insights?

As an Application Monitoring Engineer, my primary responsibilities include ensuring the uptime of services, managing infrastructure, and monitoring transactions. I use New Relic to set up incidents...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

OpenText SiteScope has a lot of use cases including monitoring websites, monitoring URLs, monitoring infrastructure resources like CPU, hard disk, and memory usage, and customized monitoring script...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 4% of the time

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 10% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 6% of the time

Stackify vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

New Relic

October 2026

Download New Relic product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

October 2026

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Also Known As

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

Overview

New Relic offers comprehensive server and application performance monitoring features, empowering organizations with real-time insights and customizable dashboards for efficient issue resolution.

Possessing robust capabilities, New Relic provides in-depth application data, allowing users to trace and diagnose issues efficiently. Its powerful API integration enables seamless performance improvement tracking. Despite certain areas for improvement like configuration handling and pricing, New Relic remains a preferred choice for application performance monitoring, server monitoring, and infrastructure management, facilitating end-to-end observability and enhancing application health.

What are New Relic's key features?

Server Monitoring: Provides insights into system health and performance metrics.
Real-Time Application Performance Insights: Offers instant data on application performance and user experience.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor dashboards to display the most relevant data for specific needs.
API Integration: Supports integration with external tools for enhanced performance tracking.
Scalability: Adapts to the growing needs of enterprises, ensuring continuous monitoring effectiveness.
Synthetic Monitoring: Simulates user interactions to preemptively identify potential issues.

Why consider New Relic's benefits?

In-Depth Data: Access to comprehensive application data for quick issue resolution.
Efficient Alerting: Real-time alerts to identify and address problems swiftly.
Improved Performance: Metrics and insights that facilitate enhanced application performance.
Tool Integrations: Integration enhances value by combining various system insights.

In sectors like finance and e-commerce, New Relic is utilized for real-time performance monitoring, allowing businesses to identify bottlenecks, manage infrastructure effectively, and ensure seamless user experiences. By tracking API response times and monitoring databases, companies improve performance and user satisfaction through better observability and synthetic monitoring.

New Relic

OpenText SiteScope provides agentless monitoring of infrastructure and applications, offering an intuitive experience with comprehensive solutions for managing APIs, URLs, and log files. It's designed for those seeking ease of use and flexibility without the need for server agents.

SiteScope is known for its agentless architecture that facilitates seamless monitoring across a range of technologies including AWS, VMware, and APIs. Users benefit from ready-to-use templates and an intuitive dashboard. Despite its flexibility, SiteScope has challenges with integration and modern features like cloud and DevOps monitoring. The Java interface is slow and setup can be cumbersome, with costly licensing and room for improvement in reporting and scalability.

What are the key features of OpenText SiteScope?

Agentless Architecture: Eliminates the need for server agents, minimizing intrusion.
Ready-to-Use Templates: Simplifies monitoring setup across different environments.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports server, database, URL, and API monitoring.
Integration Capabilities: Works with AWS, VMware, and other technologies.
Intuitive Dashboard: Provides easy-to-understand data visualization.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Cost Efficiency: Agentless setup reduces operational costs.
Flexibility: Supports multiple technologies and environments.
Time Management: Predefined templates save setup time.
Performance Assurance: Ensures consistent performance with synthetic monitoring.
Operational Insight: Enhances decision-making through comprehensive data visualization.

OpenText SiteScope is implemented in industries like healthcare and government organizations for maintaining system performance and uptime. It supports monitoring across platforms, including Linux, Windows, and VMware, enabling users to address infrastructure and application monitoring needs without agent-related challenges.

OpenText

Sample Customers

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. OpenText SiteScope

November 2026

Free Report: New Relic vs. OpenText SiteScope

Find out what your peers are saying about New Relic vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our New Relic vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.