Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Monte Carlo vs SAP Data Services comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Monte Carlo
Ranking in Data Quality
30th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Data Observability (2nd)
SAP Data Services
Ranking in Data Quality
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Monte Carlo is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Data Services is 4.9%, down from 17.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Quality Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP Data Services4.9%
Monte Carlo1.3%
Other93.8%
Data Quality
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2774796 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Governance System Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Data observability has transformed data reliability and now supports faster, trusted decisions
The best features Monte Carlo offers are those we consistently use internally. Of course, the automated DQ monitoring across the stack stands out. Monte Carlo can do checks on the volume, freshness, schema, and even custom business logic, with notifications before the business is impacted. It does end-to-end lineage at the field level, which is crucial for troubleshooting issues that spread across multiple extraction and transformation pipelines. The end-to-end lineage is very helpful for us. Additionally, Monte Carlo has great integration capabilities with Jira and Slack, as well as orchestration tools, allowing us to track issues with severity, see who the owners are, and monitor the resolution metrics, helping us collectively reduce downtime. It helps our teams across operations, analytics, and reporting trust the same datasets. The best outstanding feature, in my opinion, is Monte Carlo's operational analytics and dashboard; the data reliability dashboard provides metrics over time on how often incidents occur, the time to resolution, and alert fatigue trends. These metrics help refine the monitoring and prioritize our resources better. Those are the features that really have helped us. The end-to-end lineage is essentially the visual flow of data from source to target, at both the table and column level. Monte Carlo automatically maps the upstream and downstream dependencies across ingestion, transformation, and consumption layers, allowing us to understand immediately where data comes from and what is impacted when any issue occurs. Years ago, people relied on static documentation, which had the downside of not showing the dynamic flow or issue impact in real time. Monte Carlo analyzes SQL queries and transformations, plus metadata from our warehouses and orchestration tools, providing the runtime behavior for our pipelines. For instance, during network outages, our organization tracks metrics such as SAIDI and SAIFI used internally and for regulators. The data flow involves source systems such as SCADA, outage management systems, mobile apps for field crews, and weather feeds pushing data to the ingestion layer as raw outage events landing in the data lake. Data then flows to the transformation layer, where events are enriched with asset, location, and weather data, plus aggregations that calculate outage duration and customer impact, ultimately reaching the consumption layer for executive dashboards and regulatory reporting. Monte Carlo maps this entire food chain. Suppose we see a schema change in a column named outage_end_time and a freshness delay in downstream aggregated tables; the end-to-end lineage enables immediate root cause identification instead of trial and error. Monte Carlo shows that the issue is in the ingestion layer, allowing engineers to avoid wasting hours manually tracing SQL or pipelines, which illustrates how end-to-end lineage has really helped us troubleshoot our issues.
reviewer2686500 - PeerSpot reviewer
SAP BI Architect at a government with 10,001+ employees
Integration has become more robust and seamless
SAP Data Services is mainly used for extraction of data, and it works with all databases. The flows and everything are configured effectively. One of the most valuable features is that it is integrated. Compared to the past, it is much more robust and easier to use. The only issue is that documentation is not up to the mark. The data quality management features support our business because we can fetch anything based on the requirements. Before, we used to have a tough time getting data, but now, with HANA and all these tools, it is seamless.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It makes organizing work easier based on its relevance to specific projects and teams."
"Monte Carlo's introduction has measurably impacted us; we have reduced data downtime significantly, avoided countless situations where inaccurate data would propagate to dashboards used daily, improved operational confidence with planning and forecasting models running on trusted data, and enabled engineers to spend less time manually checking pipelines and more time on optimization and innovation."
"SAP Data Services provides a best-in-class return on investment, as SAP's vision and forecast are absolutely amazing."
"SAP Data Services has been around for a while and still performs its job well; it remains a fast data-moving tool, faster than most new ones."
"The logic is also simple. It makes it easy to build your extraction."
"The most valuable feature of SAP Data Services is the integration with data sources."
"I appreciate having access to the SAP data."
"The product's most valuable features are data validation and rules."
"One of the most valuable features is that it is integrated."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the scheduling part."
 

Cons

"Some improvements I see for Monte Carlo include alert tuning and noise reduction, as other data quality tools offer that."
"For anomaly detection, the product provides only the last three weeks of data, while some competitors can analyze a more extended data history."
"There needs to be multi-language support, however, my understanding is they are working on multi-language now."
"The interface of SAP Data Services is still easy to use, but it is also dated as things are evolving."
"In the future, Data Services should offer a cloud version."
"An area for improvement in SAP Data Services could involve making the product more accessible to non-technical end-users."
"The solution shows a lack of cloud support data services."
"It will work fine only in an SAP environment. It could be said that the integration with other vendors could be better."
"The execution engines and processing engines have shortcomings and need improvements."
"Newer feature integration is lagging behind the company acquisitions and the product could do more to service a broader range of devices."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has moderate pricing."
"The pricing is a little high to make the product more competetive in the marketplace."
"The enterprise version of SAP Data Services is free."
"Pricing is good, there is no problem."
"There is a one time purchase fee plus annual maintenance."
"At the entry level, if you're using it only for data integration, it is a little bit cheap. However, for large organizations it can be expensive. There are additional costs apart from the license."
"Speaking about prices, Oracle and SAP are market leaders. So, the prices are more."
"The price is very reasonable."
"The product’s on-premise version is expensive for a medium-sized company."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
7%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise36
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do you evaluate the ratio of price to quality for SAP Data Services?
I believe the license for the product is fair, even though some competitors offer similar services at lower prices. The difference between the Edge edition and the next one up is significant in pr...
Would you recommend SAP Data Services to complete beginners?
I think after some preparation, a beginner will be able to use SAP Data Services, however, if you are completely unprepared, you may have some issues. I think that in particular you will need a mo...
How has SAP Data Services helped your organization?
SAP Data Services has helped our whole staff understand the data across various sources and systems within the company. Not everyone who works at my organization is an IT expert - most just have av...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP BusinessObjects Data Services, SAP BusinessObjects Data Integrator, BusinessObjects Data Integrator
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
EMC Corporation, LivePerson, Eldorado, Mozzart, The VELUX Group, AOK Bundesverband, Hilti Group, Nissha Printing Company Ltd., Asian Paints, Aareal Bank Group, Migros Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Qlik and others in Data Quality. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.