Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Quorum OnQ comparison

The compared Mimecast and Quorum solutions aren't in the same category. Mimecast is ranked #16 in DLP , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 2.6% mindshare in the category. Quorum is ranked #40 in BRS , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Quorum users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Code42 Incydr and Quorum OnQ are two strong contenders in the data security and backup solutions market. Based on user feedback, Code42 Incydr seems to have the upper hand in terms of feature richness and user satisfaction, while Quorum OnQ is noted for its robust recovery capabilities and overall reliability.

Features: Code42 Incydr is known for its advanced data loss detection, rapid response capabilities, and seamless integration with existing systems. In contrast, Quorum OnQ stands out for its dependable disaster recovery, ease of use in critical scenarios, and comprehensive recovery solutions.

Room for Improvement: Code42 Incydr could enhance its mobile experience, improve reporting features, and provide better customization options. Quorum OnQ users suggest improvements in scalability, additional documentation for complex deployments, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Code42 Incydr is straightforward to deploy and offers efficient customer support, making the transition easy for users. Quorum OnQ also scores well in deployment efficiency but is particularly noted for its highly responsive customer service and effective troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Users find that Code42 Incydr offers competitive pricing relative to its features and security benefits, resulting in a favorable ROI. Quorum OnQ's pricing is higher, but users feel justified due to its top-tier disaster recovery features and overall dependability.

To learn more, read our detailed Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 886,426 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection	2.6%
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	6.9%
Cyera	5.3%
Other	85.2%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Quorum OnQ	0.9%
Veeam Data Platform	6.1%
Rubrik	3.6%
Other	89.4%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Chuck_Mackey

Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support

In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.

Read full review

reviewer2594778

Senior Application Analyst at a non-profit with 5,001-10,000 employees

Enhanced filtering for advocate emails

Quorum provides an elevated ability to filter on everything from people's location to age to their voting history. This is an extreme feature that will help our advocacy department a lot. It encompasses the ability to formulate emails and calls to action across regions. Their platform is more advanced than our previous one. It provides a smooth training experience and easy terminology for those in the advocacy world.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Enables me to work from two locations."

"The tool also offers good scalability, and the dashboard, along with real-time analytics, is very good."

"For Cloudflare Access, I am using the free plan...The most valuable feature is their protection."

"Clover is the best product globally."

"It will take the blow rather than our applications should an attack occur."

"It's a perfect solution from my perspective; it's easy to understand and easy to configure."

"Cloudflare is simple to use."

"The capabilities of the software are strong enough for me to do what it's supposed to do. For me, we don't need to do a lot of configuration on our site. We just enable it and monitor it."

More Cloudflare One pros

"Compared to all other backup solutions that I have encountered, Crashplan is a pleasure to use."

"This product is great for data recovery."

"When doing a computer replacement, we restore the data on the new laptop just by having the user log in to Code42."

"The product isn't free, but the value that is given with the software functionality is top of the line."

"We are now able to keep our corporate data safe for those who don't work in a center with IT support."

"No longer the fear of losing work which has been worked on for a long time."

"Everyone has a backup now."

"If you are looking for a reliable, private cloud, comprehensive endpoint backup solution CrashPlan is one of the best choices you can make!"

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection pros

"This is the best money I spend on my budget."

"Being able to spin up a machine in a sandbox is amazing because it allows us to test things that we otherwise would not be able to do."

"Having Quorum gives us 100 percent uptime."

"I sleep better knowing that Quorum is there."

"I like this product because it is easy to use."

"Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery."

"One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration."

"It is a stable solution."

More Quorum OnQ pros

Cons

"Cloudflare One is not very powerful, but for what we require, it is basic and sufficient."

"The onboarding process can be improved a little bit."

"Our subscription plan for the solution has a limitation of bot signatures."

"The software has automated alerts, but the automated alerts are not available in the mobile app."

"From a logging perspective, it is still a bit difficult to see exactly what users are being blocked with the current views."

"Cloudflare DDoS has poor technical support."

"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."

"Lacks a VPN feature to provide a secure connection to the data center."

More Cloudflare One cons

"They could always reduce the price."

"Clients will from time-to-time have difficulty connecting to our backup server."

"We would like to see a little more flexibility in the reporting from the admin console."

"Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products."

"I am waiting for them to develop an app that can be installed on a smartphone or tablet that backs up the data as it does for computers."

"The login screen for customers could be improved, I find that the white and grey could be hard to read for some customers depending on the brightness of their screens."

"Reporting could use an overhaul. It is very limited."

"It is complex but Code42 provides a dedicated service engineer to help."

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection cons

"The solution could do more by improving compatibility in terms of supporting other OS."

"One thing that could be done to improve it would be a single pane of glass for doing disaster recovery testing, where I could have remote consoles in one place... I still have to go to each location in a browser and then bring up the console. I'd like to see them integrate that into a single pane of glass so I don't have to go to each server."

"We found that some of the live SQL databases we were backing up would be inconsistent when we would restore them."

"Quorum OnQ's user interface is not very attractive and should be made more attractive."

"Compatibility with other platforms is the issue. Quorum OnQ can be improved by providing support for other operating systems like Ubuntu."

"They need integration with other platforms."

"I would like to see iSCSI support added so that NAS storage servers could be protected."

"I paid for subscription of Firewall. I paid for subscription of endpoint protection. Thet should introduce single subscription for all services."

More Quorum OnQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"When we first got the Quorum the licensing was different."

"When we quote the price of Quorum to customers, they find it expensive."

"The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years."

"Quorum OnQ can be described as a medium-priced product...There are no ingress and egress charges in the product."

"The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."

"The pricing is about $1,400 a month. It's a little bit on the higher side. But it's one of those situations where time is valuable for me. So if it costs a little bit more money for me to have a solution that just works and requires less of my day-to-day management, I'm willing to pay a little bit more."

"The solution’s pricing is economical."

"We have never questioned whether it is worth it because it so obviously is a great value."

More Quorum OnQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

22%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access has strong integration with Microsoft, among other platforms. However, when it comes to Kaspersky, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access provides secure access to internal applications for employees, external members of the organization...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access is one of the best integrations available. While about two hundred vendors offer similar services, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

Data Leakage Protection on large scale environments. This can be to protect against leakage on endpoints and servers ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Quorum OnQ?

It is a very scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quorum OnQ?

It's a little expensive. That said, the cost aligns with other advocacy tools we have evaluated.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quorum OnQ?

They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 4% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 5% of the time

HYCU R-Cloud vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 4% of the time

Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 3% of the time

More Quorum OnQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

April 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection

March 2026

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection report

Download Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Quorum OnQ

March 2026

Download Quorum OnQ product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

Mimecast Incydr, Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

OnQ

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection streamlines automated backups and simplifies navigation with intuitive interfaces, supporting cross-platform environments and central administration.

Offering seamless integration of security and management tools, Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection enhances data protection while ensuring ease of use. With real-time data management and centralized administration, businesses experience minimized maintenance effort. Despite needing improvements in reporting, account management, and mobile integration, its robust risk scoring and lightweight clients offer substantial benefits. Designed for corporate and HIPAA-related data, it aids recovery from device losses and strengthens data loss prevention, integrating well into egress strategies.

What are the key features of Mimecast?

Automated Backups: Ensures data is backed up seamlessly with minimal intervention.
Real-time Data Management: Provides up-to-date data access and processing.
Cross-platform Support: Maintains functionality across different systems and devices.
Intuitive Interfaces: Easy navigation improves user experience.
Centralized Administration: Allows for streamlined management of data and security measures.
Risk Scoring: Customizable settings for enhanced data protection.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex data protection tasks with intuitive processes.
Maintenance Efficiency: Reduces manual effort through automated features.
Resource Utilization: Optimizes device and cloud resources for better performance.
Robust Support: Ensures help is readily available to address issues.

Industries like healthcare and legal benefit from Mimecast's data recovery support for HIPAA-compliance and large-scale unstructured data management. The platform is adaptable for both on-premises and cloud-based deployments, essential for maintaining security in high-risk environments such as during legal investigations.

Mimecast

Quorum onQ is the global leader in 1-click instant recovery, providing full immediate recovery of your critical systems after any storage, system or site failure. It does this by automatically maintaining up-to-date, ready-to-run virtual machine clones of your physical and virtual servers stored on a dedicated appliance – clones that will transparently take over for failed servers within minutes.

Quorum

Sample Customers

23andMe

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

LCL Bulk Transport

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ

April 2025

Free Report: Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs. Quorum OnQ report.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.