Mimecast Incydr vs Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) comparison

Mimecast Incydr vs. Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mimecast Incydr

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

25th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Proofpoint Email Data Loss ...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

35th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Mimecast Incydr is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Chuck_Mackey

Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support

In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.

Read full review

Han Pieterse

Cosultant at Kadaster

Offers flexible licensing and easy setup, but has challenges with European compliance

It is difficult to meet the European security compliancy regulations using Proofpoint since it is very focused on the American market, differing significantly from European policies. Additionally, there is uncertainty about the future level of license pricing because American organizations sometimes change their product offerings. Barracuda's Active Directory checking feature is one area where Proofpoint could improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Works in the background and users are able to perform restores."

"t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan."

"Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable."

"Low system overhead, setting retention policies, ease of use"

"The solution is very stable. Very rarely do we have any issues with it. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it to be reliable."

"It required very little ongoing maintenance once setup."

"There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure."

"Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer."

More Mimecast Incydr pros

"Proofpoint offers flexibility in licensing, accommodating various levels from small businesses to governments."

"We have too many features included in the solution. These include third-party malware detection as a primary feature and a secondary feature focused on dealing with various security threats."

Cons

"What I think could be improved is how I get support."

"Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products."

"The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."

"More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD)."

"There doesn't seem to be any feature that is lacking."

"I think one we can improve is the compression."

"I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin."

"You can't always filter out data that you'd like to."

More Mimecast Incydr cons

"It is difficult to meet the European security compliancy regulations using Proofpoint since it is very focused on the American market, differing significantly from European policies."

"It is difficult to meet the European security compliance regulations using Proofpoint since it is very focused on the American market, differing significantly from European policies."

"The tool is expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Performing Arts

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

Data Leakage Protection on large scale environments. This can be to protect against leakage on endpoints and servers that consist of highly classified or propriety information. It can be added on a...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

The licenses for Proofpoint are effective, however, there is uncertainty about future pricing as American organizations might change their product, thereby altering the license. Microsoft has been ...

What needs improvement with Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

What is your primary use case for Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

I know the portfolio of Proofpoint. I work with email backup and email security. Most of the time, I consult for various organizations about email and email security.

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 11% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 9% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 8% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 8% of the time

More Mimecast Incydr Competitors

Material Data Protection vs Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 42% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 29% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 29% of the time

More Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Competitors

Product Reports

Mimecast Incydr

Download Mimecast Incydr product report

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Download Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) product report

Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) report

Also Known As

Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

No data available

Overview

Mimecast Incydr offers a comprehensive data protection and recovery solution, ideal for organizations needing robust insider threat protection and regulatory compliance.

Mimecast Incydr provides a seamless experience across platforms with lightweight clients and centralized administration. It focuses on real-time monitoring, instant access to backups, strong encryption, and customizable risk scoring. This ensures data protection against insider threats while promoting ease of use and low system overhead. Although improvements are possible in areas like Java dependency reduction, GUI design, cloud storage integration, and comprehensive reporting, Mimecast Incydr remains valuable for data classification, legal discovery, and identity management, especially for large environments handling classified information.

What key features does Mimecast Incydr offer?

Lightweight Clients: Ensures minimal system impact
Version Backups: Keeps data secure with historical availability
Seamless Data Recovery: Provides instant access to critical data
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Operates across diverse systems
Strong Encryption: Protects sensitive information
Customizable Risk Scoring: Tailors threat assessment to needs
Flexible Storage Options: Supports continuous backup capabilities

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and management
Regulatory Compliance: Aids adherence to industry standards
Centralized Administration: Streamlines management processes
Low System Overhead: Minimizes resource consumption
Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates prompt threat response

Mimecast Incydr is leveraged across industries for data leakage protection and egress solution integration. It supports HIPAA-compliant backups and peer-to-peer data management, proving invaluable for corporate data protection and traveling employees facing data loss risks. Its application in legal data discovery and disaster recovery planning enhances its relevance for IT administrators and compliance officers managing data-intensive operations.

Mimecast

Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive corporate data by monitoring, detecting, and preventing email data breaches. It leverages advanced policies and real-time monitoring to ensure compliance and reduce risks effectively.

Proofpoint Email DLP addresses critical enterprise needs by safeguarding against email data leaks with comprehensive policy frameworks and intelligent monitoring capabilities. It offers customizable templates for various compliance standards, aiding IT departments in maintaining data security without complicating internal processes. Implementing Proofpoint Email DLP enhances data protection strategies and minimizes the risk of accidental leaks.

What are the key features of Proofpoint Email DLP?

Policy Frameworks: Pre-configured and customizable templates for regulatory compliance.
Real-Time Monitoring: Instantly detects and addresses potential data violations as emails are processed.
Incident Management: Provides detailed reports for quick investigation and resolution.
Integration: Easily integrates with other security systems to offer comprehensive data protection.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Data Security Enhancement: Reduces data breach risks through proactive monitoring and policies.
Compliance Support: Ensures adherence to industry standards with customizable policy templates.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines incident management, reducing response time and resource allocation.
Risk Mitigation: Minimizes accidental data leaks, safeguarding company reputation.

In industries like finance and healthcare, where data sensitivity is paramount, Proofpoint Email DLP is commonly implemented. These sectors benefit significantly due to its robust compliance features, enabling firms to protect client data and meet stringent regulatory requirements efficiently.

Proofpoint

Sample Customers

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Information Not Available

Mimecast Incydr vs. Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)