Microsoft System Center vs SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management comparison

Microsoft and SAP are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Microsoft is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8, while SAP is ranked #24. Microsoft holds a 1.0% mindshare in AIS, compared to SAP’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.

Microsoft System Center

Read 19 Microsoft System Center reviews

186 Views
57 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

SAP NetWeaver Business Rule...

Read 2 SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management reviews

118 Views
42 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Microsoft System Center

SAP NetWeaver Business Rule...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Microsoft System Center and SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management are solutions competing in IT infrastructure and business process management. Microsoft System Center is favored for its pricing and support, whereas SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is valued for its robust feature set.

Features: Microsoft System Center offers integration with other Microsoft products, automation, and virtualization tools. SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is strong in defining and managing business rules, providing a flexible rules engine integrated with SAP applications. Microsoft focuses on IT system management, while SAP targets business process automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center has a lower barrier to entry with extensive documentation, suitable for various IT infrastructures. SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management requires a more complex setup due to its capabilities but provides a robust support structure. Microsoft offers compatibility with existing environments, while SAP suits SAP ecosystems with a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center has competitive pricing, leading to a quicker return on investment through reduced operational costs and effective resource management. SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management involves a higher initial setup cost but delivers value in SAP-reliant environments. Microsoft is more budget-friendly for diverse IT needs, while SAP offers long-term returns in specialized SAP operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft System Center

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (22nd)

SAP NetWeaver Business Rule...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

24th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Microsoft System Center is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Ajinkya Mohod

System Security Engineer at Punch Powertrain nv

Makes user management and application management easy for users

Speaking about the impact of the automation feature that impacted our company's operational efficiency, I can say that the complete tool works on automation. You just have to configure it, and it works, especially in areas like auto-patching updates. I suggest that others can definitely go ahead with Microsoft System Center, especially beginners who choose it, can get hands-on experience with it, and acquire a good understanding of how things work. In terms of the value and benefits derived from the use of the solution, I can say that my company's operations have been made simpler because of the product, especially in areas like user management and application management where we have been benefited a lot. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Herve Guerin

Architecte SAP & Infrastructure at Teamwork

Good stability and good visibility but requires a better user interface

We're an SAP partner. We do also deploy some clients to the cloud, but 95% of the work we do with the solution is on-premises. I'd rate the solution six out of ten. I'm an architect, so I don't know enough about the implementation side to really be able to share any relevant first-hand experience in regards to setting the solution up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the automated features of it that let you schedule those updates and the ability of the product to focus on the specific updates, specific platforms, and products that we're interested in keeping up to date."

"It can generate KPIs and management reports with monthly presentations on activities and updating the environment (success and failure)."

"The tool has many valuable features, including license tracking, software deployment, and installation deployment. However, we primarily use it for Windows updates and deployment for Windows servers and desktops. It's a complex product but very well-managed. If you use all the features, they will be valuable to your organization. It allows you to deploy desktops, manage patches, and track various features."

"Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked."

"We like Microsoft System Center's Operations Manager. That is primarily why we use it."

"System Center helps to create the basis for ITIL alignment."

"The deployment and asset management features are the most valuable. These are the product's main features."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft System Center is its GUI (graphical user interface)."

More Microsoft System Center pros

"There are many features of the solution that are quite useful. For us, the most valuable aspect may be visibility."

Cons

"We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable."

"Something super important that we need is this integration via Intune Configuration Manager."

"Could be more user friendly."

"Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software deployment, we mainly use it for Windows updates. It protects many screens and integrates with databases, but it's complex compared to other solutions. Many now use cloud-based products or other tools like Automox to deploy updates and manage vulnerabilities."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"For me, the tool's UI seems to be too old."

"The platform performance and responsiveness need improvement. It still demands high computing resources."

"They should have some customized solutions or internal development, then maybe it could be easier to use different solutions or some self-developed solution."

More Microsoft System Center cons

"The solution could improve its user interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."

"We maximized our license investment."

"I rate the product price as five to six on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is cheap and ten means it is expensive."

"Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly."

"Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."

"It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft System Center?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center's licensing is costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center?

Microsoft System Center should be easier to manage. However, it is complex to deploy, so people hesitate to use it. Though it has many features, such as licensing, asset tracking, and software depl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 54% of the time

IBM BPM vs Microsoft System Center

Compared 46% of the time

More Microsoft System Center Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center

June 2025

Download Microsoft System Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

June 2025

SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management report

Download SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management product report

Also Known As

MS System Center

NetWeaver Business Rules Management

Overview

System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.

Microsoft

SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management (SAP NetWeaver BRM) is part of the SAP NetWeaver AS Java. SAP NetWeaver BRM enables your organization to externalize business rules and manage them flexibly across multiple installations for greater agility, for consistent and transparent enforcement of policies across the entire enterprise.

SAP

Sample Customers

Kassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia

Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren, Lenovo

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.