We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Microsoft Project Server vs Teamwork Projects comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Microsoft, Broadcom and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: January 2022.
564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the way you can build the schedule by the Don't Start Before or Don't Start After values. You can use it to build your schedule based on how you change your dates. This is how it actually builds the schedule.""Microsoft Project Server helps organizations in collaboration.""The stability of the 2019 version is quite good.""Microsoft Project Server is easy to use compared to other similar solutions, such as Primavera. It functions similar to Excel or others Microsoft solutions which makes it simple for most people to be able to use right away.""The usability is excellent.""The solution, overall, is excellent for project planning.""The solution is stable.""The solution's ease of use is its most valuable aspect."

More Microsoft Project Server Pros →

"The setup was very easy. Deployment was very fast for us. We started using it within two weeks."

More Teamwork Projects Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup was complex.""I'd like it if we could divide out the project calendars. On one project server, we might follow five projects or more at one time, and we'd like to see all of the items at once so that it becomes a long loop, but one where we can identify different projects in tandem and then focus on which we need to at the time. While I only have visibility into one, I'd like to see several at a time.""The solution could have more compact dashboards, such as one finds with Planview.""We think that calculations are not working correctly, and there is a need to enter data a couple of times in order to give the correct calculations.""It would be useful if the solution allowed us to share files or project schedules. You may get that with the cloud version. However, it's not available on the on-premises versions.""We need to be able to compare milestones, calls, and other variables regarding the projects we are working on. I have to contract developers to make reports, which is where things get complicated. They need to develop personal and custom fields for us.""It needs to be more collaborative from inside the application. It only does project scheduling for me. It would be good if it could do other things and be more collaborative, such as sharing tasks for users. It is not really incorporated into MS Office, so you can't copy-paste stuff. It is on its own, doing its own thing. It is only used for scheduling, and it doesn't work well with anything else.""It should be more agile and more flexible when it comes to customization."

More Microsoft Project Server Cons →

"The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app."

More Teamwork Projects Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is on the expensive side."
  • "There is a licensing cost."
  • "There is an annual license required for this solution."
  • "I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."
  • "I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."
  • "The price of the Microsoft Project Server could improve, it is expensive here in Africa. When comparing Microsoft Project Server to Oracle Primavera for us, Microsoft Project Server is quite cost-effective."
  • More Microsoft Project Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Microsoft Project Server helps organizations in collaboration.
    Top Answer: 
    The price of the Microsoft Project Server could improve, it is expensive here in Africa. When comparing Microsoft Project Server to Oracle Primavera for us, Microsoft Project Server is quite… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The reporting aspects can be improved, which is one of the reasons why I'm using Qlik Sense. In the older on-prem versions, reporting was lackluster, to say the least. Project Online has a better… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The setup was very easy. Deployment was very fast for us. We started using it within two weeks.
    Top Answer: 
    The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app.
    Top Answer: 
    We use Teamwork Projects for the basics like tasks, times, and Gantt charts. It helps us a lot.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,217
    Comparisons
    2,308
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    629
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    361
    Comparisons
    337
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    208
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Project Server
    Learn More
    Overview
    Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.
    Our function-rich software gives you every advantage to stay on track and deliver on time. Teamwork Projects combines high-performance features that build smarter workflows and close communication gaps so you can focus on getting things done. Features include task management, time tracking, milestones, Gantt charts, instant high-level reports and more. When all communication, documentation and task coordination is in one place, collaboration is exactly what it should be… productive.
    Offer
    Learn more about Microsoft Project Server
    Learn more about Teamwork Projects
    Sample Customers
    Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
    PayPal, eBay, Disney, Forbes, Microsoft studios, Spotify Vevo, Lenovo, HP, Honda
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise55%
    No Data Available
    Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Microsoft, Broadcom and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: January 2022.
    564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Project Server is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 13 reviews while Teamwork Projects is ranked 17th in Project Management Software with 1 review. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.6, while Teamwork Projects is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teamwork Projects writes "Easily deployable and good for simple projects". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with JIRA Portfolio, Broadcom Clarity PPM, Planview Enterprise One, Jira and SAP Portfolio and Project Management, whereas Teamwork Projects is most compared with Jira, monday.com, Smartsheet and Broadcom Clarity PPM.

    We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.