We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Teamwork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We use Microsoft Project Server for project management."
"I found the portfolio management valuable."
"The technical support for Microsoft Project Server and the support is very good. Microsoft support is working very well."
"Technical support is very responsive - particularly on critical tickets."
"The solution scales well."
"The key things are managing interactions, resource allocation, resource-leveling (enterprise) and as a collaborative tool, because we use it across multiple projects at a time."
"It's stable and reliable."
"It is well-established, reliable, and compatible."
"It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Teamwork is easy."
"Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports."
"The setup was very easy. Deployment was very fast for us. We started using it within two weeks."
"The price of the product must be improved."
"The solution could have more compact dashboards, such as one finds with Planview."
"The solution's desktop version is not compatible with the MacBook."
"EPM 2010 UI seems a bit dated now that 2016 is available."
"The price of the solution could be reduced."
"It needs to be more collaborative from inside the application. It only does project scheduling for me. It would be good if it could do other things and be more collaborative, such as sharing tasks for users. It is not really incorporated into MS Office, so you can't copy-paste stuff. It is on its own, doing its own thing. It is only used for scheduling, and it doesn't work well with anything else."
"Work needs to be done on collaboration with SharePoint."
"The initial setup was complex."
"The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app."
"The product is expensive. It needs to have a more robust and customizable calendar."
"The screen sharing provided by the solution can be a challenge to a user. Screen sharing is an area that needs improvement in the solution."
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 55 reviews while Teamwork is ranked 23rd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Teamwork is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teamwork writes "A flexible, stable, and scalable tool requiring an easy initial setup phase". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio, whereas Teamwork is most compared with Smartsheet, Jira, monday.com and OpenText Project and portfolio Management. See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Teamwork report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
