We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and SAP Portfolio and Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management."It allows you to be granular, and send each step."
"It's probably one of the most user-friendly platforms I've ever used."
"Since I'm using it for a variety of purposes, not just project management, I can customize boards and workspaces based on the needs of that particular workflow."
"The reminder function and tagging function work really well."
"The ability to track dates and times we need cases to be completed has been of great use to my firm."
"The solution just makes it so much easier to keep track of where things are."
"I enjoy being able to switch between different views of a board, such as Gantt or Kanban, as this provides alternative ways of viewing tasks and managing workload."
"Time tracking has been a godsend."
"The stability of the 2019 version is quite good."
"Technical support is very responsive - particularly on critical tickets."
"The most useful feature of Microsoft Project Server is you can select a function to see the baseline."
"Technical support is good."
"Microsoft Project Server helps organizations in collaboration."
"The technical support for Microsoft Project Server and the support is very good. Microsoft support is working very well."
"The usability is excellent."
"The solution has easy integration with Excel."
"The integration portion with SAP models is valuable."
"We would like to have more open boards at one time and more CRM functionalities."
"The solution has dashboards, however, you have a limited amount. You may only get ten when you need closer to 30. We often need to create many boards. For example, we might need one board per customer. If we have more than ten customers, we run out of boards available. I'm not sure if you can pay more in order to get more or if it's just a design limitation. It's unclear. In any case, they should be more generous."
"As far as I know, when I make a new entry on a Board, and I'm putting in the first piece of information, you can't just hit return or tab to the next element."
"We need to have conversations within the platform."
"If Monday.com could increase the refresh rate of the site, that would make things a little better."
"This isn't a platform where you scrimp on the training and send one person to bring back knowledge. Monday is different things to different people, and context matters."
"If you want to drag a task or rearrange them, it's quite tricky, especially on the app."
"A more personalized dashboard displaying each account's unfinished assignments would be helpful."
"The cost could be lower."
"The check-in, check-out feature makes Microsoft Project Server pretty slow or cumbersome to use."
"This solution could improve by adding integration with Primavera schedules to allow the reading and management of them."
"The reporting aspects can be improved, which is one of the reasons why I'm using Qlik Sense. In the older on-prem versions, reporting was lackluster, to say the least. Project Online has a better handle on that. However, we will still be using Qlik Sense. We're also looking at an add-on app from a company called OnePlan that adds some additional functionality where Microsoft is not as clean in its approach for things such as portfolio management and some of the trends analysis."
"Collaboration within the tool is lacking when you compare it to online or cloud-based tools."
"The deployment aspect of the product is a bit tedious."
"There need to be more tutorials available to users."
"We need to be able to compare milestones, calls, and other variables regarding the projects we are working on. I have to contract developers to make reports, which is where things get complicated. They need to develop personal and custom fields for us."
"It would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products like Jira and Bitbucket."
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 7th in Project Portfolio Management with 17 reviews while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is ranked 9th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.6, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Portfolio and Project Management writes "Integrates well with SAP models, but doesn't integrate with performance trackers like Jira". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Jira, Microsoft Project, Broadcom Clarity PPM and Planview ProjectPlace, whereas SAP Portfolio and Project Management is most compared with Planisware, Asana, Planview PPM Pro, Jira and Artemis Enterprise.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
