Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Entra ID Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Microsoft Security Suite solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Microsoft Entra ID Protection Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution helps identify threats and vulnerabilities.""One valuable feature is the Microsoft Security Scorecard.""The product’s most valuable features are compliance, recommendations, and inventories.""The solution is up-to-date and helps prevent zero-day attacks.""The product's stability is very high...The scalability of the product is amazing."

More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Pros →

"The primary and most valuable aspect of Azure AD identity is its ability to function seamlessly on both on-premise and cloud infrastructure, eliminating the need for extensive updates. However, this dual solution can pose vulnerabilities that require substantial support and security measures in the on-premise environment. Despite the challenges, it is currently not feasible to completely abandon AD, especially for companies in the sales and energy sectors. The integration with Microsoft Defender is crucial for enhancing security, making identity and security the primary focus and purpose of Azure AD.""I use conditional access most of the time.""The solution helps us with authentication.""The reverse proxy feature provides additional security that is not available in other solutions.""The tool is simple and you can find a lot of tutorials, and videos on YouTube that can help you."

More Microsoft Entra ID Protection Pros →

Cons
"The technical support takes too much time to resolve tickets.""Integration can be improved.""It is challenging to extract and customize reports from the system.""The setup phase of the product is not that easy and needs a person to have a certain level of expertise.""The general support could be improved."

More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Cons →

"Identity labeling and sensitivity needs improvement.""The solution is not optimized to work with Mac devices on a granular level. They work seamlessly with Windows but have a lot to improve to work with Mac devices. It also needs to improve stability and scalability.""The solution's sync should be faster since it can take about 30 minutes to two hours to complete a simple sync. The tool needs to sync instantly. It also needs to improve scalability, support, and stability.""Azure AD could improve by enhancing the availability of specialized courses for security, such as NETSCOUT security or other relevant certifications. It would be beneficial to have specific courses for security, to provide in-depth knowledge and skills related to Azure AD. While there are micro-learning resources available for various concepts, many people in the IT industry may not have the time to go through all the courses to properly configure and utilize Azure Active Directory. Simplifying the implementation process and making it easier for individuals to join a company with Azure AD could also be considered areas for improvement.""Integrating some notifications, not necessarily all, but at least for important events or alerts, would be beneficial as it would function as a team solution or something similar."

More Microsoft Entra ID Protection Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product’s pricing is medium."
  • "The licensing model follows a per-user per-month structure."
  • "I rate the product's price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."
  • "The tool is a bit costly."
  • More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is competitive in the SMA segment and runs $5-$6 per user."
  • "The price of Azure AD is not expensive."
  • "Azure Active Directory Identity Protection is not very expensive."
  • More Microsoft Entra ID Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Microsoft Security Suite solutions are best for your needs.
    770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Azure Active Directory Identity Protection is not very expensive. Security is not free, and it comes with a cost but the charge is reasonable.
    Top Answer:When it comes to logs, we don't have access to all of them because there's a limitation of 90 days for log retention. It would be a great option to have the ability to increase this duration in the… more »
    Ranking
    27th
    Views
    249
    Comparisons
    210
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    8.3
    13th
    Views
    2,036
    Comparisons
    1,770
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    951
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Azure Active Directory Identity Protection, Azure AD Identity Protection
    Learn More
    Microsoft
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Defender Vulnerability Management delivers asset visibility, intelligent assessments, and built-in remediation tools for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and network devices. Leveraging Microsoft threat intelligence, breach likelihood predictions, business contexts, and devices assessments, Defender Vulnerability Management rapidly and continuously prioritizes the biggest vulnerabilities on your most critical assets and provides security recommendations to mitigate risk.

    Microsoft Entra ID Protection uses advanced machine learning to identify sign-in risks and unusual user behavior to block, challenge, limit, or allow access.

    Prevent identity compromise

    Extend risk-based adaptive access policies to help protect against malicious actors. 

    Help protect against credential theft

    Safeguard sensitive access with high-assurance authentication methods.

    Deepen insights into your identity security posture

    Export intelligence back into any Microsoft or other security information and event management (SIEM) and extended detection and response (XDR) tools for further investigation.

    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Microsoft Entra ID Protection
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Microsoft Entra ID Protection and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is ranked 27th in Microsoft Security Suite with 5 reviews while Microsoft Entra ID Protection is ranked 13th in Microsoft Security Suite with 5 reviews. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Entra ID Protection is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management writes "The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID Protection writes "Enables smooth user sign-on experience, seamlessly deployment, and scales well". Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Sentinel, whereas Microsoft Entra ID Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, BloodHound Enterprise, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management and Microsoft Sentinel. See our Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Microsoft Entra ID Protection report.

    See our list of best Microsoft Security Suite vendors.

    We monitor all Microsoft Security Suite reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.