![Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_64/GqfBeX9zWxZG3rC5hyrUo9Aq.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT)

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform and Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence compete in endpoint protection. ThreatLocker is praised for pricing and support, while Microsoft Defender is favored for a broader feature set and value.
Features: ThreatLocker provides mobile app access for remote management, comprehensive user training, and advanced features like ring-fencing and selective elevation to enhance application security. Microsoft Defender offers seamless integration across Microsoft's ecosystem, leveraging global threat intelligence for effective threat detection and email security.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest that ThreatLocker should improve training flexibility and provide staggered updates. Enhancements to user interactions and interface are also recommended. Microsoft Defender can benefit from more accessible pricing for non-enterprise users and improved third-party integration to better address hybrid environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThreatLocker receives positive feedback for rapid customer support and its "Chat With a Cyber Hero" feature. Microsoft Defender integrates well within Microsoft ecosystems, but users express the need for better integration and support regarding its complex licensing.
Pricing and ROI: ThreatLocker is considered reasonably priced, offering significant ROI by reducing downtime and operational costs. Microsoft Defender is viewed as cost-effective within the Microsoft 365 bundle, though its pricing complexity can be a concern. They both deliver beneficial returns, with ThreatLocker's transparent pricing contrasting the more intricate models of Microsoft Defender.
It's a value-for-money product.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
The main return on investment is peace of mind, knowing that with ThreatLocker on any endpoint, it will almost always block all malicious code or exploits, even zero-day exploits.
It keeps malware, Trojans, and ransomware at bay.
Level two support is knowledgeable and knows how the product works, which is very good.
I would give Microsoft an eight for their technical support.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
If there were some customizations available, I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
It provides a high level of security and avoids phishing and scam emails.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
Providing code customization would help keep pace with new vulnerabilities and threats.
The main area of improvement for Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is related to how information is conveyed.
From the telemetry data standpoint, I would prefer Defender data to be more open in future updates.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
I had a really good deal at the time, and it continues to be cost-effective.
If it wasn't for that real-time threat detection on the vulnerability, I think we would not have survived the attack.
One of the best features is that it provides a certain level of customization, allowing us to set our spam confidence levels.
Our threat detection is enhanced due to the AI agents in Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, which helps in detecting automatically.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers comprehensive security by integrating with Microsoft platforms, retaining data within tenants, and providing real-time threat detection and collaboration. It's designed for both enterprise and SMB environments.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence enhances cybersecurity operations by integrating with Azure Sentinel and Microsoft products like Intune and Azure. Its capabilities in endpoint, email, and cloud security ensure robust protection against a wide range of threats. With global threat data, anti-spam features, and customization options, it addresses threat prevention and vulnerability management. Seamless scaling and proactive incident prevention make it a reliable choice for enterprises looking for collaborative, efficient security management.
What are the key features of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence?Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is crucial for industries that value data retention and comprehensive threat analyses in safeguarding their operations. Financial institutions, healthcare providers, and technology firms implement this solution to secure their environments by updating security protocols and ensuring compliance with various industry standards. The focus on integration and customization helps these organizations adapt to evolving cybersecurity threats effectively.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform empowers organizations with application control, selective elevation, and ring-fencing to enhance security and prevent unauthorized access.
ThreatLocker provides comprehensive security management using application allowlisting to ensure only approved software operates across servers and workstations. The platform's centralized management simplifies security processes by consolidating multiple tools, and its robust capabilities align with zero-trust strategies by actively blocking unauthorized applications and ensuring compliance. Users note intuitive features such as mobile access, helpful training resources, and responsive support, which effectively reduce operational costs and help desk inquiries. The managed service providers prefer ThreatLocker to maintain network integrity by preventing malicious scripts and unauthorized access attempts. However, users identify room for growth in training and support flexibility, the interface, and certain technical challenges like network saturation from policy updates.
What are the most important features?Organizations utilize ThreatLocker for application allowlisting, ensuring only authorized software operates to prevent unauthorized access efficiently. Deployed across servers and workstations, its features support zero-trust principles and are favored by managed service providers for application management and network integrity.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.