McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform comparison

McAfee and Zscaler are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. McAfee is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.7, while Zscaler is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. McAfee holds a 1.0% mindshare in DLP, compared to Zscaler’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

McAfee Total Protection for...

Read 29 McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention reviews

489 Views
353 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Read 63 Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform reviews

3,013 Views
1,588 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

McAfee Total Protection for...

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform compete in the data protection and cybersecurity space. McAfee seems to have an upper hand with its affordability and straightforward setup, while Zscaler's strength lies in its advanced cloud integration features.

Features: McAfee offers strong endpoint security, robust data protection capabilities, and customizable policies. The DLP feature instills confidence in data safety, and the solution is straightforward to set up. Zscaler allows seamless cloud integration, features like VPN access and threat monitoring, and provides cloud-based DLP with SSL inspection. It offers a centralized interface for scalability and user-friendliness.

Room for Improvement: McAfee needs better pricing and support levels and lighter resource usage for virtual environments. Enhanced integration for dynamic environments and improved user guides are also necessary. Zscaler faces issues with high costs and complexity, while also needing improvements in non-web traffic coverage, support, and policy management granularity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee is typically deployed on-premises, suitable for organizations with significant infrastructure but has mixed customer service reviews. Zscaler offers flexible deployment options like cloud-based and hybrid solutions, easing management but requiring smoother customer support processes.

Pricing and ROI: McAfee is generally affordable, providing good ROI, though support and licensing can add costs. Zscaler is costlier but offers ROI through advanced integration and scalability. Its pricing model is effective for large user bases, justifying the higher investment with its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee Total Protection for...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

27th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (5th), Application Control (3rd), ZTNA as a Service (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (12th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (10th), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is 6.6%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

VivekGupta7

DGM at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Versatile with good patching and a straightforward setup

There is some fine-tuning needed, even once you define something. We need to do a lot of configuration. It would be easier if they made the configuration simpler, especially in the beginning. They need to give the user more choices and provide more guidance to help avoid problems later on. We'd like some more built-in predictive analytics so we can be prepared for what might happen in the future. We did have some bandwidth issues during setup. If your update fails, you may have stability issues. We find it difficult to reach higher levels of support when we face larger issues.

Read full review

Sumit Bhanwala

architect at Tata Consultancy

Cloud-based platform simplifies device and data center management

I find it to be good. The solution is cloud-based with the latest inspection engines, which I find to be amazing. We are less dependent on data centers and device management, which reduces our efforts significantly. It improves our device management, data center management, and updating devices. We need fewer engineers for this management, and it reduces time and efforts for data center management, device upgrades, and IT support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup process was easy."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to control access to USB drives and other external devices."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is a very stable product."

"The most valuable feature right now is the user control."

"I am impressed with the tool's firewalls and web protection."

"The overall features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are very good."

"The solution is very user-friendly and valuable."

"The solution has good stability and endpoint."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pros

"It is straightforward to set up."

"The product provides a seamless user experience."

"Zscaler CASB's latency and architecture are excellent."

"The tool's scalability is good."

"The product’s most valuable features are inbound and outbound scanning and API control."

"I like the web filtering capabilities."

"The policies are very easy to implement."

"The agent's versatility is notable, used for digital experience monitoring to collect valuable endpoint metrics for troubleshooting."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pros

Cons

"The product fails to offer automatic classification capabilities to its users."

"The user interface is messy and could be simplified."

"It could improve how it deals with solar data."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention needs to improve the resources it uses for CPU and RAM."

"The licensing cost for McAfee Total Protection could be cheaper, but apart from that, I don't need anything else. The software has what I need."

"The solution takes up too much CPU and memory."

"The solution needs to be a one-stop protection shop. And yet, the DLP isn't strong. Anyone can break it quite easily."

"The UI needs to be simplified."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention cons

"We often face performance and latency issues with Zscaler SASE."

"The DX layer could be better if it had improved visibility."

"There could be additional ways to define proximity. Additionally, they should provide some exclusion options for specific policies and an ability to control the DLP engine."

"There is some issue while accessing the portal. It takes too long."

"Occasionally, there are certain delays in report generation."

"While Zscaler supports client-initiated connections, it does not support server-initiated connections. This is a feature that Zscaler may consider adding in the future."

"Zscaler CASB should include integrations with other SaaS applications."

"Another area of improvement is implementation through non-client connectors. The solution can be implemented in two ways. One uses the back file; the other one uses client connectors. So the client connector is pretty fast, but when it comes to non-client connectors and procedures, it's kind of delayed and slow."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."

"The price is high for this type of product."

"The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions. There is no additional cost to using McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention."

"It's not a cheap option."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

"My company is a Zscaler Private Access partner, so the customers pay for the license fees."

"In the long run, cloud services are not inherently costly."

"It's expensive currently. But when purchasing for a large number of users, there's room to negotiate. It's really up to the procurement team."

"Zscaler Private Access can be an expensive solution, depending on the license type you will purchase."

"It is an auto-renewal subscription service."

"The licensing model for Zscaler Cloud DLP allows you to only buy what you need. You don't need to buy it as a whole, so it's good."

"The technical support is good."

"In terms of market positioning, I would describe Zscaler Private Access as offering optimal pricing. Based on our experience, Cato Networks tends to be slightly more expensive."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

The product’s pricing could be cheaper.

See all answers

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zscaler SASE?

The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler SASE?

Zscaler SASE is quite expensive compared to other solutions. The price is not fixed and it does not include all of the features, so my advice for organizations would be to evaluate their specific n...

See all answers

Comparisons

HP Wolf Security vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 81% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 3% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 2% of the time

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 8% of the time

FortiSASE vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Netskope Private Access vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

May 2025

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report

Download McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

May 2025

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform product report

Also Known As

McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data

Zscaler SASE, Zscaler DLP, Zscaler CASB, Zscaler CSPM, Zscaler Browser Isolation, Zscaler Posture Control

Overview

McAfee Total Protection for Data solution suite protects your data using a combination of powerful encryption, access control, and user-behavior monitoring.

McAfee

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform acts as a VPN alternative for secure remote access, cloud protection, and zero-trust strategies. It enables secure data transmission, supports remote work, and enhances compliance through a cloud-based architecture, offering improved performance and simplified management.

Designed for organizations seeking secure application access and robust data protection, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform delivers a comprehensive solution through seamless VPN connectivity, data loss prevention, and SSL inspection. Its cloud integration ensures scalability and reliability, while its interface provides intuitive management. Companies benefit from automatic secure access, minimizing constant authentication needs, and safeguarding sensitive data. The platform allows easy deployment and integration with diverse identity providers, granting granular control for access and application segmentation. Despite powerful capabilities, enhancements are needed in speed, bandwidth, and legacy support, with users noting interface and configuration challenges.

What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform?

Seamless VPN Connectivity: Provides automatic secure access without repetitive authentication.
Strong Security Measures: Offers DLP and SSL inspection for data protection.
Cloud Integration: Ensures scalability and performance optimization.
Granular Access Control: Manages access with application-specific segmentation.

What benefits should companies look for in reviews when evaluating this platform?

Performance: Enhanced connectivity and reduced latency.
Data Protection: Comprehensive DLP and encryption capabilities.
Scalability: Efficient handling of growing organizational demands.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup and integration with IDPs.

In specific industries, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange has been implemented to enhance security protocols in fields like finance and healthcare. By prioritizing data protection and compliance, it assists companies in safely managing sensitive information and meeting regulatory requirements. Organizations leverage its features to ensure secure operations across remote and cloud environments, adapting to industry-specific needs with customizable access and security controls.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

Kleberg Bank

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

June 2025

Free Report: McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.