"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."
More Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is ranked 17th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review while MobileIron UEM is ranked 18th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review. Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is rated 9.0, while MobileIron UEM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management writes "Highly stable, simple packages assigning, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MobileIron UEM writes "Centrally managed with everything in one place, but the interface needs to be improved". Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is most compared with Microsoft Intune, ManageEngine Desktop Central, Ivanti Avalanche, Jamf Pro and VMware Workspace ONE, whereas MobileIron UEM is most compared with Microsoft Intune, VMware Workspace ONE, BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite, IBM MaaS360 and Jamf Pro.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
