Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ManageEngine OpManager vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] comparison

ManageEngine and Tenable are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Additionally, 82% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tenable users who would recommend it.
ManageEngine OpManager
Read 54 ManageEngine OpManager reviews
  • 2,751 Views
  • 2,531 Comparison Views
82% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between ManageEngine OpManager and Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.0
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (9th)
Tenable SecurityCenter Cont...
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Charles A - PeerSpot reviewer
Reporting features improve operational efficiency while weekend support needs enhancement
Support is moderate and needs improvement, especially during weekends when technicians perform upgrades. During weekends, they need to provide more support to ensure a smooth transition. There is a call for ManageEngine OpManager to scale better in automation and AI functionality. Although the product stability is good, support enhancement is necessary to enable better planning for upgrades and maintenance activities.
Read full review
SM
A stable security solution with a useful visibility feature
We use it to scan all of our servers and network devices on a monthly basis. Then based on the outcome, we do the patching depending on high availability, and so on Through porting, we can see how the improvement is happening over a period of time. We can see the overall scenario from the last…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to reach most of our network devices and get the most from them."
"The most valuable feature is the network-related reporting."
"The product provides intensive reports."
"We don't have to keep an eye on it; it has a good automation option, which keeps us informed. It gives very less false positives. Overall, a really great product."
"This is a good general monitoring system that has all the features we require and they constantly update with new capabilities."
"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash."
"The solution is scalable."
"The application monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."
More ManageEngine OpManager pros
"Through porting, we can see how the improvement is happening over a period of time. We can see the overall scenario from the last year, where were we were and where we currently stand."
"The next big one is supportability. In a large enterprise, we have many types of technologies. The technology we previously had didn't even support authentication to a lot of those technologies."
"We can manage everything with only a single console on the Tenable SecurityCenter. We can pull and define the policy. We can perform every task on the Tenable SecurityCenter."
"The first of the valuable features is how easy it is to access all of the information that's gathered from the assessments... With a lot of other technologies, like Rapid7, if you're using Nexpose you effectively have to be a DBA to get some of the lower-level results from the scans. And Qualys wasn't very intuitive."
"The scanning itself is really the core of the tool, and it's what we're most interested in."
 

Cons

"It would be great if there were some sort of artificial intelligence feature which would help us make improvements in the network once we find an issue, and do it automatically."
"The integration with various OEM products could be simplified."
"The licensing for this solution is not straightforward and should be improved."
"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view."
"We would like the solution's customize and build functionality to be more user-friendly."
"We get a lot of false alerts."
"ManageEngine OpManager could improve the default dashboards that are available. We are not able to customize them easily and they do not give us the information we need unless we customize them. You need to have the technical knowledge to be able to do it, the customization should be easier."
"I would like to see more capabilities and specific profiles built for the manufacturing sector."
More ManageEngine OpManager cons
"One area which is missing is cloud security because there are a lot of configurations. Rapid7 has a product called a DV cloud. I would like to have a similar kind of solution and feature."
"There are certain circumstances where they may have found a vulnerable service and they just removed the service completely from the device because nobody was using it. There's no way to go into SecurityCenter and mark it, to say, "This is no longer an issue. It doesn't exist anymore." Or, "The risk was accepted for one year, so let's not report it as 'high' until that one year period is done." The handling of operational flow around vulnerability management could be improved."
"In terms of what could be improved, some customers have a problem with SecurityCenter's ticket system. If I want them to assign one of the issues, they may want to assign someone to it or to assign it somewhere else and I may want to break up the ticket."
"When it comes to... dynamic application scanning, I think they are lagging behind the curve. They have a lackluster solution, to the point where I think they need to determine, as a company, whether or not that's a space they even want to play in."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."
"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."
"The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."
"The pricing is moderate."
"The product is not worth the money."
"Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager depends on the number of nodes you onboard and whatever pricing is reflected on the ManageEngine portal which offers discounts from ten percent to fifteen percent. It purely depends on the sales volume and the negotiation. In my organization, there are about one thousand two hundred nodes which cost around $29,000 per year. There's no additional support fee or maintenance fee from ManageEngine OpManager. Pricing for the solution is highly competitive and I would rate it five out of five. ManageEngine OpManager is one of the most competitive options out there."
"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."
More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice
"Pricing-wise, it's fine. It's not an expensive product. That's not an issue."
"We did a three-year deal where the cost is amortized over the three years. The Elite Support was an additional cost to the standard licensing fees... If you use Security Center, most of the time it is on-premise, so you're going to have some sort of infrastructure to build out and there's going to be a cost associated with that."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise27
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?
The product provides intensive reports.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?
Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager is good and negotiable with the distributor; they provide us with the best support.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?
One challenge in ManageEngine OpManager is that improvements are needed because a customer using the solution has Check Point firewall and needs to monitor their VPN tunnels, but there is no option...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 20% of the time
Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 15% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 14% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 8% of the time
Nagios XI vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
Nagios XI vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 7% of the time
More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors
ThousandEyes vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] Logo
ThousandEyes vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]
Compared 100% of the time
More Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine OpManager
August 2025
ManageEngine OpManager reportDownload ManageEngine OpManager product report
Buyer's Guide
Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]
August 2025
Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] reportDownload Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

OpManager
SecurityCenter Continuous View, SecurityCenter CV
 

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

SecurityCenter Continuous View is the market-leading continuous network monitoring platform. It integrates SecurityCenter along with multiple Nessus Network Monitor sensors and Log Correlation Engine (LCE) to provide comprehensive continuous network monitoring.

Tenable
 

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC
Methodist Healthcare Ministries
Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
September 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.