SCOM and ManageEngine OpManager compete in the IT infrastructure monitoring category. ManageEngine OpManager appears to have the upper hand, thanks to its usability, ease of setup, and affordability, making it a favorite for quick deployment and network visibility.
Features: SCOM is robust in Microsoft environments, providing extensive management packs and granular system insights. It is praised for deep customization capabilities. ManageEngine OpManager is known for its simplified network monitoring and cross-platform integration, offering ease of use and rich dashboards.
Room for Improvement: SCOM is criticized for high resource requirements, complex setup, and overwhelming alerts. Its interface and dashboards lack intuitiveness. OpManager requires enhancements in AI capabilities, device discovery, and cloud service monitoring. SCOM needs better integration and performance, while OpManager should focus on automation and cloud readiness.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer on-premises deployment. OpManager leads in setup simplicity, requiring less training and offering straightforward deployment. SCOM's deployment can be complex despite seamless integration into Microsoft environments. Both provide solid support, with Microsoft Premier Support being highly regarded. ManageEngine's support is responsive but could benefit from better documentation.
Pricing and ROI: SCOM is part of the System Center suite and offers extensive functionalities, which can justify its higher price for Microsoft-committed enterprises. ManageEngine OpManager is a more cost-effective solution, appealing without existing Microsoft commitments, offering competitive pricing with low initial costs and affordable add-ons. Both promise good ROI through infrastructure monitoring, but SCOM's ROI is difficult to calculate due to complex licensing, while OpManager's affordability and ease cater to straightforward and scalable monitoring solutions.
However, from a sales perspective, it's very challenging for the initial sale, and even renewals are tough when it comes to the price point.
I would give nine points out of ten for ManageEngine OpManager's technical support.
More support is needed, especially on weekends.
I would recommend a rating of ten out of ten for support.
They often treat issues in isolation, not considering how one problem might relate to another.
When I was working directly with Microsoft at TCS, my first company, the support experience was quite smooth, and we received solutions promptly.
Scalability is needed more in automation and AI functionalities.
The scalability of SCOM, meaning its ability to adapt to our needs, is excellent because we are working with SQL systems and multiple servers.
I have not seen many errors or frequent data loss because once we have installed the agent on the system and have the details, not much manual intervention is required.
SCOM is a bit unstable lately, primarily due to a lack of resources.
If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure.
Improving the after-sales support and learning materials for local engineers and partners to enhance their capacities and expertise.
There is a call for ManageEngine OpManager to scale better in automation and AI functionality.
I would like to see a software-as-a-service version in Azure to eliminate the need for on-premise infrastructure.
SCOM is likely to be phased out in favor of more compatible tools like Icinga for application monitoring or when moving to cloud solutions like CloudWatch and Azure.
It would be beneficial to have a summary on one single dashboard, as there are many more possibilities available.
The cost is quite high-end for ManageEngine OpManager, especially in our very price-sensitive market here in Sri Lanka.
Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager is good and negotiable with the distributor;
The automated reporting back, which includes identifying the top list and trends, as well as session monitoring from the end user to server through routers and firewalls, provides exact issue notifications for network problems.
The biggest benefit of ManageEngine OpManager for our customers is centrally managing the users and assets of an organization, along with link management, bandwidth management, and similar functionalities.
Managing platforms and network device virtualization on one platform is beneficial.
It assists me in detecting server downtime and delivers basic performance monitoring right out of the box.
The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool.
SCOM integrates several systems and offers correlation features, like setting up everything around Active Directory or DNS.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SCOM | 1.6% |
| ManageEngine OpManager | 1.4% |
| Other | 97.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 27 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 54 |
ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.
SCOM (System Center Operations Manager) is a cross-platform data center monitoring and reporting tool that checks the status of various objects defined within the environment, such as server hardware, system services, etc. The solution allows data center administrators to deploy, configure, manage, and monitor the operations, services, devices and applications of multiple enterprise IT systems via a single pane of glass. It is suitable for businesses of all sizes.
SCOM Features
SCOM has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
SCOM Benefits
There are several benefits to implementing SCOM. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the SCOM solution.
A Manager at a financial services firm says, “The feature I like most about SCOM is that it is easy-to-use. I find it very user-friendly. I also like the knowledge base which it has. You can find the resolution to questions or issues directly within the SCOM itself. It will alert you with a recommendation of what you need to do at the same time. This sort of self-diagnosis or prompting is one of the great values you get from SCOM compared to other solutions.”
PeerSpot user Zahari Z., Information Technology Auditor at a financial services firm, mentions, “Availability monitoring is the feature I have found most valuable, as well as the capacity and ability to send notifications. There is a mechanism to set up a notification from the SCOM and whenever there is a drop in the availability the notification alerts not only for availability but for other issues as well. You can align thresholds according to the speed of your environment and you can have a threshold related notification, which is one of the useful features.”
Bill W., Sr. Systems Engineer at Arapahoe County Government, comments, “ I like some of their newer features, such as maintenance schedules, because SCOM records SLA and SLO time. When we patch, things are automatically put into maintenance mode so that the numbers for our systems being down, do not count against us.”
A Project Manager at a tech services company explains, “The feature I have found most valuable is the book feature. While we run the Sprint one we can add some setups for multiple sprints.”
A Systems Engineer at an educational organization states, “Because it's Windows-based, it actually reports quite well. It reports everything you can think of on the Windows server and allows you to monitor anything. It's excellent for those in the Windows world as it's very good at it.”
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
